Dataset Information

Is Response Assessment of Breast Cancer Bone Metastases Better with Measurement of ¹⁸F-Fluoride Metabolic Flux Than with Measurement of ¹⁸F-Fluoride PET/CT SUV?

ABSTRACT: Our purpose was to establish whether noninvasive measurement of changes in ¹⁸F-fluoride metabolic flux to bone mineral (K_i) by PET/CT can provide incremental value in response assessment of bone metastases in breast cancer compared with SUV_max and SUV_mean Methods: Twelve breast cancer patients starting endocrine treatment for de novo or progressive bone metastases were included. Static ¹⁸F-fluoride PET/CT scans were acquired 60 min after injection, before and 8 wk after commencing treatment. Venous blood samples were taken at 55 and 85 min after injection to measure plasma ¹⁸F-fluoride activity concentrations, and K_i in individual bone metastases was calculated using a previously validated method. Percentage changes in K_i, SUV_max, and SUV_mean were calculated from the same index lesions (?5 lesions) from each patient. Clinical response up to 24 wk, assessed in consensus by 2 experienced oncologists masked to PET imaging findings, was used as a reference standard. Results: Of the 4 patients with clinically progressive disease (PD), mean K_i significantly increased (>25%) in all, SUV_max in 3, and SUV_mean in 2. Of the 8 non-PD patients, K_i decreased or remained stable in 7, SUV_max in 5, and SUV_mean in 6. A significant mean percentage increase from baseline for K_i, compared with SUV_max and SUV_mean, occurred in the 4 patients with PD (89.7% vs. 41.8% and 43.5%, respectively; P < 0.001). Conclusion: After 8 wk of endocrine treatment for bone-predominant metastatic breast cancer, K_i more reliably differentiated PD from non-PD than did SUV_max and SUV_mean, probably because measurement of SUV underestimates fluoride clearance by not considering changes in input function.

SUBMITTER: Azad GK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6424232 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Is Response Assessment of Breast Cancer Bone Metastases Better with Measurement of 18F-Fluoride Metabolic Flux Than with Measurement of 18F-Fluoride PET/CT SUV?

Azad Gurdip K GK Siddique Musib M Taylor Benjamin B Green Adrian A O'Doherty Jim J Gariani Joanna J Blake Glen M GM Mansi Janine J Goh Vicky V Cook Gary J R GJR

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine 20180724 3

Our purpose was to establish whether noninvasive measurement of changes in 18F-fluoride metabolic flux to bone mineral (Ki) by PET/CT can provide incremental value in response assessment of bone metastases in breast cancer compared with SUVmax and SUVmeanMethods: Twelve breast cancer patients starting endocrine treatment for de novo or progressive bone metastases were included. Static 18F-fluoride PET/CT scans were acquired 60 min aft ...[more]

PMID: 30042160

Similar Datasets

Project description:Knowledge of the within-subject variability of 18F-FDG PET/MRI measurements is necessary for proper interpretation of quantitative PET or MRI metrics in the context of therapeutic efficacy assessments with integrated PET/MRI scanners. The goal of this study was to determine the test-retest repeatability of these metrics on PET/MRI, with comparison to similar metrics acquired by PET/CT. Methods: This prospective study enrolled subjects with pathology-proven pelvic malignancies. Baseline imaging consisted of PET/CT immediately followed by PET/MRI, using a single 370-MBq 18F-FDG dose. Repeat imaging was performed within 7 d using an identical imaging protocol, with no oncologic therapy between sessions. PET imaging on both scanners consisted of a list-mode acquisition at a single pelvic station. The MRI consisted of 2-point Dixon imaging for attenuation correction, standard sequences for anatomic correlation, and diffusion-weighted imaging. PET data were statically reconstructed using various frame durations and minimizing uptake time differences between sessions. SUV metrics were extracted for both PET/CT and PET/MRI in each imaging session. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) metrics were extracted for both PET/MRI sessions. Results: The study cohort consisted of 14 subjects (13 female, 1 male) with various pelvic cancers (11 cervical, 2 rectal, 1 endometrial). For SUVmax, the within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV) appeared higher for PET/CT (8.5%-12.8%) than PET/MRI (6.6%-8.7%) across all PET reconstructions, though with no significant repeatability differences (all P values ≥ 0.08) between modalities. For lean body mass-adjusted SUVpeak, the wCVs appeared similar for PET/CT (9.9%-11.5%) and PET/MRI (9.2%-11.3%) across all PET reconstructions, again with no significant repeatability differences (all P values ≥ 0.14) between modalities. For PET/MRI, the wCV for ADCmedian of 3.5% appeared lower than the wCVs for SUVmax (6.6%-8.7%) and SULpeak (9.2%-11.3%), though without significant repeatability differences (all P values ≥ 0.23). Conclusion: For solid tumors of the pelvis, the repeatability of the evaluated SUV and ADC metrics on 18F-FDG PET/MRI is both acceptably high and similar to previously published values for 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI, supporting the use of 18F-FDG PET/MRI for quantitative oncologic treatment response assessments.

Project description:BackgroundMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in the diagnosis of leptomeningeal metastases (LM); however, some sub-centimeter lesions may be missed. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has a high sensitivity and may play a synergistic role with MRI in diagnosing spinal LM (SLM). We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the detection of SLM with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT (18F-FDG PET/CT) compared to that of whole spinal cord MRI in a single center.MethodsPatients with SLM who had undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI were enrolled. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging findings were independently reviewed by 2 nuclear medicine physicians. 18F-FDG PET/CT findings of SLMs were described. A consistency test was conducted to assess the patient-based diagnostic results obtained by the 2 physicians. Patient-based sensitivity, accuracy, and specificity in diagnosing SLM between 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI of the whole spinal cord were compared using the chi-square or Fisher's exact test. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was obtained to assess the diagnostic performance of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) to diagnose SLM.ResultsA total of 16 patients with SLM were included in this study from October 2010 to April 2022. The primary tumor involved the lungs, liver, ovaries, prostate, esophagus, and unknown primary site. The mean age of patients, including 13 males and 3 females, was 57.8±11.2 (range, 34-73) years. Of 16 patients with SLM, 10 had nodular diseases, 2 had linear diseases, and 4 had mixed diseases. The kappa value of the consistency test of the 2 radiologists' diagnostic results was 0.765. The patient-based sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosing SLM were 87.5%, 89.2%, and 88.7%, respectively and those of whole spinal cord MRI were 75.0%, 100.0%, and 92.5%, respectively. There were no significant differences in sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy between the 2 methods, with P values of 0.654, 0.115, and 0.506, respectively. However, more nodular diseases were observed on PET/CT. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the prediction of SLM by SUVmax was 0.907 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.831-0.983]. When SUVmax ≥2.45, the Youden index was the largest, and the sensitivity and specificity were 89.3% and 75.7%, respectively.Conclusions18F-FDG PET/CT is a good choice of imaging modality for assessing SLM. In the diagnosis of SLMs, PET/CT and enhanced MRI can play a better synergistic role.

Project description:BackgroundAn inflammatory reaction in the airways and lung parenchyma, comprised mainly of neutrophils and alveolar macrophages, is present in some patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Thoracic fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) has been proposed as a promising imaging biomarker to assess this inflammation. We sought to introduce a fully quantitative analysis method and compare this with previously published studies based on the Patlak approach using a dataset comprising 18F-FDG PET scans from COPD subjects with elevated circulating inflammatory markers (fibrinogen) and matched healthy volunteers (HV). Dynamic 18F-FDG PET scans were obtained for high-fibrinogen (>2.8 g/l) COPD subjects (N = 10) and never smoking HV (N = 10). Lungs were segmented using co-registered computed tomography images and subregions (upper, middle and lower) were semi-automatically defined. A quantitative analysis approach was developed, which corrects for the presence of air and blood in the lung (qABL method), enabling direct estimation of the metabolic rate of FDG in lung tissue. A normalised Patlak analysis approach was also performed to enable comparison with previously published results. Effect sizes (Hedge's g) were used to compare HV and COPD groups.ResultsThe qABL method detected no difference (Hedge's g = 0.15 [-0.76 1.04]) in the tissue metabolic rate of FDG in the whole lung between HV (μ = 6.0 ± 1.9 × 10-3 ml cm-3 min-1) and COPD (μ = 5.7 ± 1.7 × 10-3 ml cm-3 min-1). However, analysis with the normalised Patlak approach detected a significant difference (Hedge's g = -1.59 [-2.57 -0.48]) in whole lung between HV (μ = 2.9 ± 0.5 × 10-3 ml cm-3 min-1) and COPD (μ = 3.9 ± 0.7 × 10-3 ml cm-3 min-1). The normalised Patlak endpoint was shown to be a composite measure influenced by air volume, blood volume and actual uptake of 18F-FDG in lung tissue.ConclusionsWe have introduced a quantitative analysis method that provides a direct estimate of the metabolic rate of FDG in lung tissue. This work provides further understanding of the underlying origin of the 18F-FDG signal in the lung in disease groups and helps interpreting changes following standard or novel therapies.

Dataset Information

Is Response Assessment of Breast Cancer Bone Metastases Better with Measurement of ¹⁸F-Fluoride Metabolic Flux Than with Measurement of ¹⁸F-Fluoride PET/CT SUV?

Publications

Is Response Assessment of Breast Cancer Bone Metastases Better with Measurement of <sup>18</sup>F-Fluoride Metabolic Flux Than with Measurement of <sup>18</sup>F-Fluoride PET/CT SUV?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets