Dataset Information

Effectiveness of screening for atrial fibrillation and its determinants. A meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Many atrial fibrillation patients eligible for oral anticoagulants are unaware of the presence of AF, and improved detection is necessary to facilitate thromboprophylaxis against stroke.

Objective

To assess the effectiveness of screening for AF compared to no screening and to compare efficacy outcomes of different screening strategies.

Materials and methods

Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE and MEDLINE from Jan 1, 2000 -Dec 31, 2015 were searched. Studies employing systematic or opportunistic screening and using ECG or pulse palpation in populations age ?40 years were included. Data describing study and patient characteristics and number of patients with new AF were extracted. The outcome was the incidence of previously undiagnosed AF.

Results

We identified 25 unique (3 RCTs and 22 observational) studies (n = 88 786) from 14 countries. The incidence of newly detected AF due to screening was 1.5% (95% CI 1.1 to 1.8%). Systematic screening was more effective than opportunistic: 1.8% (95% CI 1.4 to 2.3%) vs. 1.1% (95% CI 0.6 to 1.6%), p<0.05, GP-led screening than community based: 1.9% (95% CI 1.4 to 2.4%) vs. 1.1% (95% CI 0.7 to 1.6%), p<0.05, and repeated heart rhythm measurements than isolated assessments of rhythm: 2.1% (95% CI 1.5-2.8) vs. 1.2% (95% CI 0.8-1.6), p<0.05. Only heart rhythm measurement frequency had statistical significance in a multivariate meta-regression model (p<0.05).

Conclusions

Active screening for AF, whether systematic or opportunistic, is effective beginning from 40 years of age. The organisation of screening process may be more important than technical solutions used for heart rhythm assessment.

SUBMITTER: Petryszyn P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6426211 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effectiveness of screening for atrial fibrillation and its determinants. A meta-analysis.

Petryszyn Pawel P Niewinski Piotr P Staniak Aleksandra A Piotrowski Patryk P Well Anna A Well Michal M Jeskowiak Izabela I Lip Gregory G Ponikowski Piotr P

PloS one 20190320 3

<h4>Background</h4>Many atrial fibrillation patients eligible for oral anticoagulants are unaware of the presence of AF, and improved detection is necessary to facilitate thromboprophylaxis against stroke.<h4>Objective</h4>To assess the effectiveness of screening for AF compared to no screening and to compare efficacy outcomes of different screening strategies.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE and MEDLINE from Jan 1, 2000 -Dec 31, 2015 were sear ...[more]

PMID: 30893323

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceUndiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important cause of stroke. Screening for AF using wrist-worn wearable devices may prevent strokes, but their cost-effectiveness is unknown.ObjectiveTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of contemporary AF screening strategies, particularly wrist-worn wearable devices.Design setting and participantsThis economic evaluation used a microsimulation decision-analytic model and was conducted from September 8, 2020, to May 23, 2022, comprising 30 million simulated individuals with an age, sex, and comorbidity profile matching the US population aged 65 years or older.InterventionsEight AF screening strategies, with 6 using wrist-worn wearable devices (watch or band photoplethysmography, with or without watch or band electrocardiography) and 2 using traditional modalities (ie, pulse palpation and 12-lead electrocardiogram) vs no screening.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, defined as US dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Secondary measures included rates of stroke and major bleeding.ResultsIn the base case analysis of this model, the mean (SD) age was 72.5 (7.5) years, and 50% of the individuals were women. All 6 screening strategies using wrist-worn wearable devices were estimated to be more effective than no screening (range of QALYs gained vs no screening, 226-957 per 100 000 individuals) and were associated with greater relative benefit than screening using traditional modalities (range of QALYs gained vs no screening, -116 to 93 per 100 000 individuals). Compared with no screening, screening using wrist-worn wearable devices was associated with a reduction in stroke incidence by 20 to 23 per 100 000 person-years but an increase in major bleeding by 20 to 44 per 100 000 person-years. The overall preferred strategy was wearable photoplethysmography, followed conditionally by wearable electrocardiography with patch monitor confirmation, which had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $57 894 per QALY, meeting the acceptability threshold of $100 000 per QALY. The cost-effectiveness of screening was consistent across multiple scenarios, including strata of sex, screening at earlier ages (eg, ≥50 years), and with variation in the association of anticoagulation with risk of stroke in the setting of screening-detected AF.Conclusions and relevanceThis economic evaluation of AF screening using a microsimulation decision-analytic model suggests that screening using wearable devices is cost-effective compared with either no screening or AF screening using traditional methods.

Project description:Objective To compare the efficacy, safety, and cost effectiveness of direct acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for patients with atrial fibrillation.Design Systematic review, network meta-analysis, and cost effectiveness analysis. Data sources Medline, PreMedline, Embase, and The Cochrane Library.Eligibility criteria for selecting studies Published randomised trials evaluating the use of a DOAC, vitamin K antagonist, or antiplatelet drug for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.Results 23 randomised trials involving 94?656 patients were analysed: 13 compared a DOAC with warfarin dosed to achieve a target INR of 2.0-3.0. Apixaban 5 mg twice daily (odds ratio 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.66 to 0.94), dabigatran 150 mg twice daily (0.65, 0.52 to 0.81), edoxaban 60 mg once daily (0.86, 0.74 to 1.01), and rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily (0.88, 0.74 to 1.03) reduced the risk of stroke or systemic embolism compared with warfarin. The risk of stroke or systemic embolism was higher with edoxaban 60 mg once daily (1.33, 1.02 to 1.75) and rivaroxaban 20 mg once daily (1.35, 1.03 to 1.78) than with dabigatran 150 mg twice daily. The risk of all-cause mortality was lower with all DOACs than with warfarin. Apixaban 5 mg twice daily (0.71, 0.61 to 0.81), dabigatran 110 mg twice daily (0.80, 0.69 to 0.93), edoxaban 30 mg once daily (0.46, 0.40 to 0.54), and edoxaban 60 mg once daily (0.78, 0.69 to 0.90) reduced the risk of major bleeding compared with warfarin. The risk of major bleeding was higher with dabigatran 150 mg twice daily than apixaban 5 mg twice daily (1.33, 1.09 to 1.62), rivaroxaban 20 mg twice daily than apixaban 5 mg twice daily (1.45, 1.19 to 1.78), and rivaroxaban 20 mg twice daily than edoxaban 60 mg once daily (1.31, 1.07 to 1.59). The risk of intracranial bleeding was substantially lower for most DOACs compared with warfarin, whereas the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding was higher with some DOACs than warfarin. Apixaban 5 mg twice daily was ranked the highest for most outcomes, and was cost effective compared with warfarin.Conclusions The network meta-analysis informs the choice of DOACs for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Several DOACs are of net benefit compared with warfarin. A trial directly comparing DOACs would overcome the need for indirect comparisons to be made through network meta-analysis.Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD 42013005324.

Project description:Background and objectiveAtrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia, typically increases with age. Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are the cornerstone of treatment to reduce the associated risk for systemic thromboembolism. Four large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are non-inferior to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in preventing stroke and systemic embolism, as well as regarding their risk for major bleeding. However, as vulnerable geriatric patients with AF were largely underrepresented in these trials, physicians are faced with the challenge of choosing the right anticoagulant for geriatric patients in real-life clinical practice. In this vulnerable patient group, NOACs tend to be underused or underdosed due to concerns of excessive fall-related intracranial bleeding, cognitive impairment, multiple drug-drug interactions, low body weight or impaired renal function. As life expectancy continues to rise worldwide, the number of geriatric patients substantially increases. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a critical appraisal of the added value of NOACs in geriatric patients with AF at high thromboembolic and bleeding risk.Methods and resultsThis systematic review provides an overview of the literature on the impact of increased age (≥75 years), multimorbidity, polypharmacy, increased falling risk, frailty and dementia on the effectiveness and safety of NOACs as compared to VKAs, after searching the Medline database. Moreover, a meta-analysis on the impact of increased age ≥75 years old was performed after pooling results from 6 post hoc analyses of RCTs and 6 longitudinal observational cohort studies, highlighting the superior effectiveness (hazard ratio (HR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.74-0.94] for stroke/SE; HR 0.77, 95%CI [0.65-0.92] for mortality) and non-inferior safety (HR 0.93, 95%CI [0.86-1.01] for major bleeding; HR 0.58, 95%CI [0.50-0.67] for intracranial bleeding; HR 1.17, 95%CI [0.99-1.38] for gastrointestinal bleeding) of NOACs versus VKAs in older AF patients.ConclusionAcross geriatric subgroups, apixaban was consistently associated with the most favourable benefit-risk profile and should therefore be preferred in geriatric patients with AF. However, research gaps on the impact of increased falling risk, frailty and baseline dementia were identified, requiring careful consideration while awaiting more results.

Project description:BackgroundA growing body of literature now exists examining associations between social determinants of health (SDOH) and adverse outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation; however, little is available on anticoagulant prescriptions and the impact of SDOH.PurposeEvaluate the impact of SDOH on anticoagulant prescriptions in patients with atrial fibrillation.Data sourcesMedline and Embase databases up to January 2021.Study selectionNoninterventional studies were included if they reported associations between at least 1 of 14 SDOH domains and anticoagulant prescription in patients with atrial fibrillation. Two investigators independently screened and collected data.Data extractionTwo investigators independently screened and collected data.Data synthesisMeta-analyses using random-effect models evaluated associations between SDOH and receiving an anticoagulant prescription. We included 13 studies, 11 of which were included in meta-analyses that reported on the impact of 9 of the 14 SDOH included in the search. Pooled estimates indicate a 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75, 0.97) lower odds of receiving anticoagulant prescriptions among Black compared to non-Black patients (reported in 6 studies); 0.42 (95% CI: 0.32, 0.55) lower odds of receiving anticoagulant prescriptions among patients with mental illness compared to those without mental illness (2 studies); and a 0.64 (95% CI: 0.42, 0.96) lower likelihood of receiving oral anticoagulant prescription among employed patients compared to unemployed patients (2 studies).LimitationsSDOH lack consistent definitions and measures within the electronic health record.ConclusionThe literature reports on only half of the SDOH domains we searched for, indicating that many SDOH are not routinely assessed. Second, social needs impact the decision to prescribe anticoagulants, confirming the need to screen for and address social needs in the clinical setting to support clinicians in providing guideline concordant care to their patients.RegistrationThis systematic review and meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO.

Dataset Information

Effectiveness of screening for atrial fibrillation and its determinants. A meta-analysis.

Background

Objective

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Effectiveness of screening for atrial fibrillation and its determinants. A meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets