Dataset Information

Development and Validation of Nomograms for Malignancy Prediction in Soft Tissue Tumors Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements.

ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to develop, validate, and compare nomograms for malignancy prediction in soft tissue tumors (STTs) using conventional and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements. Between May 2011 and December 2016, 239 MRI examinations from 236 patients with pathologically proven STTs were included retrospectively and assigned randomly to training (n?=?100) and validation (n?=?139) cohorts. MRI of each lesion was reviewed to assess conventional and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) measurements. Multivariate nomograms based on logistic regression analyses were built using conventional measurements with and without DWI measurements. Predictive accuracy was measured using the concordance index (C-index) and calibration plots. Statistical differences between the C-indexes of the two models were analyzed. Models were validated by leave-one-out cross-validation and by using a validation cohort. The mean lesion size, presence of infiltration, edema, and the absence of the split fat sign were significant and independent predictors of malignancy and included in the conventional model. In addition to these measurements, the mean and minimum apparent diffusion coefficient values were included in the DWI model. The DWI model exhibited significantly higher diagnostic performance only in the validation cohort (training cohort, 0.899 vs. 0.886, P?=?0.284; validation cohort, 0.791 vs. 0.757, P?=?0.020). Calibration plots showed fair agreements between the nomogram predictions and actual observations in both cohorts. In conclusion, nomograms using MRI features as variables can be utilized to predict the malignancy probability in patients with STTs. There was no definite gain in diagnostic accuracy when additional DWI features were used.

SUBMITTER: Lee JH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6427044 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Development and Validation of Nomograms for Malignancy Prediction in Soft Tissue Tumors Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements.

Lee Ji Hyun JH Yoon Young Cheol YC Jin Wook W Cha Jang Gyu JG Kim Seonwoo S

Scientific reports 20190320 1

The objective of this study was to develop, validate, and compare nomograms for malignancy prediction in soft tissue tumors (STTs) using conventional and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements. Between May 2011 and December 2016, 239 MRI examinations from 236 patients with pathologically proven STTs were included retrospectively and assigned randomly to training (n = 100) and validation (n = 139) cohorts. MRI of each lesion was reviewed to assess conventional and diffus ...[more]

PMID: 30894587

Similar Datasets

Project description:OBJECTIVES:To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters of small, deeply located non-malignant and malignant soft-tissue tumors (STTs). METHODS:Between May 2011 and December 2017, 95 MRIs in 95 patients with pathologically proven STTs of small size (<5 cm) and deep location (66 non-malignant and 29 malignant) were identified. For qualitative parameters, consensus reading was performed by three radiologists for presence of necrosis, infiltration, lobulation, and the tail sign. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was analyzed by two other radiologists independently. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine the diagnostic performances of MRI parameters in differentiating non-malignancy and malignancy, and for non-myxoid, non-hemosiderin STTs and myxoid STTs as subgroups. Interobserver agreement for ADC measurement was calculated with the intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS:Interobserver agreement on ADC measurement was almost perfect. On univariable analysis, the malignant group showed a significantly larger size, lower ADC, and higher incidence of all qualitative MRI parameters for all STTs. Size (p = 0.012, odds ratio [OR] 2.57), ADC (p = 0.041, OR 3.85), and the tail sign (p = 0.009, OR 6.47) were independently significant on multivariable analysis. For non-myxoid, non-hemosiderin STTs, age, size, ADC, frequency of infiltration, lobulation, and the tail sign showed significant differences between non-malignancy and malignancy on univariable analysis. Only ADC (p = 0.032, OR 142.86) retained its independence on multivariable analysis. For myxoid STTs, only size and tail sign were significant on univariable analysis without independent significance. CONCLUSIONS:Size, ADC, and incidence of qualitative MRI parameters were significantly different between small, deeply located non-malignant and malignant STTs. Only ADC was independently significant for both overall analysis and the non-myxoid, non-hemosiderin subgroup.

Project description:It is important to differentiate between benign and malignant myxoid tumors to establish the treatment plan, determine the optimal surgical extent, and plan postoperative surveillance, but differentiation may be complicated by imaging-feature overlap. Texture analysis is used for quantitative assessment of imaging characteristics based on mathematically calculated pixel heterogeneity and has been applied to the discrimination of benign from malignant soft tissue tumors (STTs). In this study, we aimed to assess the diagnostic value of the texture features of conventional magnetic resonance images for the differentiation of benign from malignant myxoid STTs. Magnetic resonance images of 39 patients with histologically confirmed myxoid STTs of the extremities were analyzed. Qualitative features were assessed and compared between the benign and malignant groups. Texture analysis was performed, and texture features were selected based on univariate analysis and Fisher's coefficient. The diagnostic value of the texture features was assessed using receiver operating curve analysis. T1 heterogeneity showed a statistically significant difference between benign and malignant myxoid STTs, with substantial inter-reader reliability. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of T1 heterogeneity were 55.6%, 83.3%, 88.2%, 45.5%, and 64.1%, respectively. Among the texture features, T2w-WavEnLL_s-3 showed good diagnostic performance, and T2w-WavEnLL_s-4 and GeoW4 showed fair diagnostic performance. The logistic regression model including T1 heterogeneity and T2_WavEnLL_s-4 showed good diagnostic performance. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the overall qualitative assessment by a radiologist and the predictor model. Geometry-based and wavelet-derived texture features from T2-weighted images were significantly different between benign and malignant myxoid STTs. However, the texture features had a limited additive value in differentiating benign from malignant myxoid STTs.

Project description:BackgroundLeft ventricular segmental wall motion analysis is important for clinical decision making in cardiac diseases. Strain analysis with myocardial tissue tagging is the non-invasive gold standard for quantitative assessment, however, it is time-consuming. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial feature-tracking (CMR-FT) can rapidly perform strain analysis, because it can be employed with standard CMR cine-imaging. The aim is to validate segmental peak systolic circumferential strain (peak SCS) and time to peak systolic circumferential strain (T2P-SCS) analysed by CMR-FT against tissue tagging, and determine its intra and inter-observer variability.MethodsPatients in whom both cine CMR and tissue tagging has been performed were selected. CMR-FT analysis was done using endocardial (CMR-FTendo) and mid-wall contours (CMR-FTmid). The Intra Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Pearson correlation were calculated.Results10 healthy volunteers, 10 left bundle branch block (LBBB) and 10 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients were selected. With CMR-FT all 480 segments were analyzable and with tissue tagging 464 segments.Significant differences in mean peak SCS values of the total study group were present between CMR-FTendo and tissue tagging (-23.8 ± 9.9% vs -13.4 ± 3.3%, p<0.001). Differences were smaller between CMR-FTmid and tissue tagging (-16.4 ± 6.1% vs -13.4 ± 3.3%, p=0.001). The ICC of the mean peak SCS of the total study group between CMR-FTendo and tissue tagging was low (0.19 (95%-CI-0.10-0.49), p=0.02). Comparable results were seen between CMR-FTmid and tissue tagging. In LBBB patients, mean T2P-SCS values measured with CMR-FTendo and CMR-FTmid were 418 ± 66 ms, 454 ± 60 ms, which were longer than with tissue tagging, 376 ± 55 ms, both p<0.05. ICC of the mean T2P-SCS between CMR-FTendo and tissue tagging was 0.64 (95%-CI-0.36-0.81), p<0.001, this was better in the healthy volunteers and LBBB group, whereas the ICC between CMR-FTmid and tissue tagging was lower.The intra and inter-observer agreement of segmental peak SCS with CMR-FTmid was lower compared with tissue tagging; similar results were seen for segmental T2P-SCS.ConclusionsThe intra and inter-observer agreement of segmental peak SCS and T2P-SCS is substantially lower with CMR-FTmid compared with tissue tagging. Therefore, current segmental CMR-FTmid techniques are not yet applicable for clinical and research purposes.

Dataset Information

Development and Validation of Nomograms for Malignancy Prediction in Soft Tissue Tumors Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements.

Publications

Development and Validation of Nomograms for Malignancy Prediction in Soft Tissue Tumors Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurements.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets