Dataset Information

Rivaroxaban concentrations in acute stroke patients with different dosage forms.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The crushed-tablet rivaroxaban concentration has been previously reported to be lower than the non-crushed concentration. However, the rivaroxaban concentration of fine granules has not yet been investigated. The anticoagulation intensity of rivaroxaban with fine granules, tablets, and crushed tablets was compared in acute stroke patients to assess the efficacy of each form.

Methods and findings

Hospitalized patients over 75 years old with acute stroke who started taking rivaroxaban from April 2012 to September 2017 were included. Blood samples were drawn just before and 4 hours after taking rivaroxaban on a median of 5 days after treatment initiation for concentration measurements (C0h, C4h) based on an anti-factor Xa chromogenic assay. Of 114 patients (49 female, 83±5 years old), 97 had ischemic strokes, 9 had transient ischemic attacks, and 8 had intracerebral hemorrhages. Rivaroxaban was administered a median of 7 days after onset. Of these, 38 patients were given the 15 mg dose, and 76 were given the 10 mg dose. In the 15 mg dose group, C0h was significantly higher in the fine granule group than in the crushed tablet group, with no significant difference compared to the tablet group [C0h: 27.6±6.8 vs 4.0±4.1 (P = 0.01) vs. 33.3±25.2 ng/ml, (P = 0.51), respectively], as was C4h [223.0±66.6 vs 103.0±79.5 (P = 0.02) vs. 229.5±121.6 ng/ml (P = 0.88)]. In the 10 mg dose group, C0h was significantly higher in the fine granule group than in the crushed tablet group and comparable to that in the tablet group [23.2±7.9 vs 7.5±6.2 (P<0.01) vs 19.0±15.8 ng/ml, (P = 0.35)], as was C4h [150.7±85.4 vs 85.1±46.8 (P<0.01) vs 189.8±92.7 ng/ml (P = 0.18)].

Conclusions

The rivaroxaban concentration with fine granules was consistent with that in the tablet group and higher than that in the crushed tablet group.

SUBMITTER: Wada S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6428291 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Rivaroxaban concentrations in acute stroke patients with different dosage forms.

Wada Shinichi S Inoue Manabu M Matsuki Takayuki T Okata Takuya T Kumamoto Masaya M Tagawa Naoki N Okamoto Akira A Miyata Toshiyuki T Ihara Masafumi M Koga Masatoshi M Toyoda Kazunori K

PloS one 20190321 3

<h4>Background</h4>The crushed-tablet rivaroxaban concentration has been previously reported to be lower than the non-crushed concentration. However, the rivaroxaban concentration of fine granules has not yet been investigated. The anticoagulation intensity of rivaroxaban with fine granules, tablets, and crushed tablets was compared in acute stroke patients to assess the efficacy of each form.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>Hospitalized patients over 75 years old with acute stroke who started takin ...[more]

PMID: 30897130

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background The ROCKET AF (Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial Fibrillation) evaluated rivaroxaban (20/15 mg/d) versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. A separate trial, J-ROCKET AF (Japanese ROCKET AF), compared rivaroxaban (15/10 mg/d) and warfarin in Japanese patients with atrial fibrillation. Data about rivaroxaban following J-ROCKET AF criteria compared with warfarin and ROCKET AF dosage were limited. Methods and Results This retrospective study used medical data from a multicenter healthcare provider in Taiwan that included 3162 patients taking rivaroxaban. Among 2320 patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥50 mL/min per 1.73 m2, 384 and 1936 patients followed the ROCKET AF (20 mg/d) and J-ROCKET AF (15 mg/d) recommendation, respectively. Among 842 patients with an eGFR <50 mL/min per 1.73 m2, 422 and 420 patients followed the ROCKET AF (15 mg/d) and J-ROCKET AF (10 mg/d) recommendation, respectively. A total of 2053 patients with atrial fibrillation receiving warfarin were identified. Rivaroxaban following either ROCKET AF or J-ROCKET AF dosage criteria was associated with a comparable risk of thromboembolism but a lower risk of bleeding than warfarin. For patients with an eGFR ≥50 mL/min per 1.73 m2, risks of clinical events did not differ significantly between the 2 dosage criteria of rivaroxaban. For patients with an eGFR <50 mL/min per 1.73 m2, the ROCKET AF dosage was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding compared with the J-ROCKET AF dosage (hazard ratio, 2.70; P=0.0445) without significant differences regarding the risk of ischemic events. Conclusions In Asian patients with atrial fibrillation, the J-ROCKET AF dosage was as effective as the ROCKET AF dosage irrespective of renal function. The risk of major bleeding was lower with the J-ROCKET AF dosage in patients with an eGFR <50 mL/min per 1.73 m2. Compared with warfarin, rivaroxaban following either dosage criteria was effective and even safer.

Project description:Increases in testosterone use and mixed reports of adverse events have raised concerns about the cardiovascular safety of testosterone. Testosterone is available in several delivery mechanisms with varying pharmacokinetics; injections cause spikes in testosterone levels, and transdermal patches and gels cause more subtle but sustained increases. The comparative cardiovascular safety of gels, injections, and patches has not been studied.To determine the comparative cardiovascular safety of testosterone injections, patches, and gels.A retrospective cohort study was conducted using administrative claims from a commercially insured (January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2012) and Medicare (January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2010) population in the United States and general practitioner records from the United Kingdom (January 1, 2000, to June 30, 2012). Participants included men (aged ?18 years) who initiated use of testosterone patches, gels, or injections following 180 days with no testosterone use. Our analysis was conducted from December 11, 2013, to November 12, 2014.New initiation of a testosterone dosage form, with use monitored for up to 1 year.Inpatient or outpatient medical records, diagnoses, or claims for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events including myocardial infarction (MI), unstable angina, stroke, and composite acute event (MI, unstable angina, or stroke); venous thromboembolism (VTE); mortality; and all-cause hospitalization.We identified 544,115 testosterone initiators between the 3 data sets: 37.4% injection, 6.9% patch, and 55.8% gel. The majority of men in the Medicare cohort were injection initiators (51.2%), most in the US commercially insured population were gel initiators (56.5%), and the UK database included equal proportions of injections and gel users (approximately 41%). With analysis conducted using hazard ratios and 95% CIs, compared with men using gels, injection initiators had higher hazards of cardiovascular events (ie, MI, unstable angina, and stroke) (1.26; 1.18-1.35), hospitalization (1.16; 1.13-1.19), and death (1.34; 1.15-1.56) but not VTE (0.92; 0.76-1.11). Compared with gels, patches did not confer increased hazards of cardiovascular events (1.10; 0.94-1.29), hospitalization (1.04; 1.00-1.08), death (1.02; 0.77-1.33), or VTE (1.08; 0.79-1.47).Testosterone injections were associated with a greater risk of cardiovascular events, hospitalizations, and deaths compared with gels. Patches and gels had similar risk profiles. However, this study did not assess whether patients met criteria for use of testosterone and did not assess the safety of testosterone among users compared with nonusers of the drug.

Dataset Information

Rivaroxaban concentrations in acute stroke patients with different dosage forms.

Background

Methods and findings

Conclusions

Publications

Rivaroxaban concentrations in acute stroke patients with different dosage forms.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets