Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Clinical Outcomes and Cost Comparisons of Stent and Non-Stent Interventions in Infrainguinal Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights From the Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease (XLPAD) Registry.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:The contemporary limb outcomes and costs of stent-based vs non-stent based strategies in endovascular revascularization of femoropopliteal (FP) peripheral artery disease (PAD) are not well understood. METHODS AND RESULTS:We present data from the ongoing United States multicenter Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease Registry between 2006-2016 to compare stent vs non-stent treatment outcomes and associated costs in FP interventions. A total of 2910 FP interventions were performed in 2162 patients (mean age, 66 years), comprising 1339 stent based (superficial femoral artery, 93%) in 1007 patients and 1571 non-stent interventions (superficial femoral artery, 85%) in 1155 patients. A growing trend for non-stent based interventions and a declining trend in repeat revascularization rate at 1 year were observed across years of registry enrollment. Stent implantation was the prevailing strategy in treating longer FP lesions (mean length, 152 mm vs 105 mm; P<.001) and chronic total occlusions (65% vs 40%; P<.001), while stent implantation was employed less frequently when treating in-stent restenotic lesions (14% vs 20%; P<.001). Stent and non-stent interventions had similar 1-year limb outcomes in all-cause death, target-limb revascularization, target-vessel revascularization, and major or minor amputation. The average procedure costs for the stent group were significantly higher than the non-stent group ($6215 vs $4790; P<.001). CONCLUSION:There is a growing trend for non-stent FP artery interventions, with a significant decline in 1-year target-limb revascularization rates over time. One-year limb outcomes in stent-based compared to non-stent interventions are similar; however, at a significantly higher procedural cost.

SUBMITTER: Banerjee S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6428413 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Clinical Outcomes and Cost Comparisons of Stent and Non-Stent Interventions in Infrainguinal Peripheral Artery Disease: Insights From the Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease (XLPAD) Registry.

Banerjee Subhash S   Jeon-Slaughter Haekyung H   Armstrong Ehrin J EJ   Bajzer Christopher C   Abu-Fadel Mazen M   Khalili Houman H   Prasad Anand A   Bou Dargham Bassel B   Kamath Preeti P   Addo Tayo T   Luna Michael M   Gigliotti Osvaldo O   Foteh Mazin M   Cawich Ian I   Kinlay Scott S   Ali Mujtaba M   Ramanan Bala B   Niazi Khusrow K   Tsai Shirling S   Shammas Nicolas W NW   Brilakis Emmanouil S ES  

The Journal of invasive cardiology 20190101 1


<h4>Background</h4>The contemporary limb outcomes and costs of stent-based vs non-stent based strategies in endovascular revascularization of femoropopliteal (FP) peripheral artery disease (PAD) are not well understood.<h4>Methods and results</h4>We present data from the ongoing United States multicenter Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease Registry between 2006-2016 to compare stent vs non-stent treatment outcomes and associated costs in FP interventions. A total of 2910 FP interventions wer  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4743556 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8150867 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11308462 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7467417 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8496926 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7749016 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5893367 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7417281 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5278564 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5114545 | biostudies-literature