Dataset Information

Performance and usability of Cepheid GeneXpert HIV-1 qualitative and quantitative assay in Kenya.

ABSTRACT:

Background

In Kenya, access to early infant diagnosis and viral load monitoring services for HIV patients on ART is significantly hampered by sample transportation challenges and long turnaround times. Near patient care testing technologies have the potential to obviate such constraints. The Cepheid GeneXpert was launched in 2010 as a TB assay and in 2014 as a potential point of care HIV viral load assay. Whereas it is widely is used for TB in Kenya, its utility for HIV testing has not been evaluated.

Objective

To investigate the performance and usability characteristics of the GeneXpert HIV-1 qualitative and quantitative assay.

Methods

This was a cross sectional study among 911 HIV Exposed infants and 310 HIV positive adults. Existing machines used for routine TB diagnosis were used in this study. The diagnostic accuracy of the qualitative assay was assessed using Roche CAP/CTM while the quantitative assay was assessed using with Abbott m2000 as the reference assays respectively. Statistical analysis was done using Stata/MP Version 14 for Mac. Concordance values and misclassification were calculated at the clinical cutoff of 1000 cp/ml.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the GeneXpert HIV-1 qualitative assay were 99.23% (95% CI 97.24-99.90%), 98.91% (95% CI 97.76-99.55%) and 99.00% respectively. For the quantitative assay, they were 92.50% (95% CI 79.61-98.43%), 100.00% and 97.00% respectively. All 30 (100%) users reported that the GeneXpert machine was easy to use, workflow was simple and TB diagnosis was not negatively affected. In our hands, the median turn-around time for an individual qualitative and quantitative test was 90 minutes. A total of 58 (4.34%) errors and 28 (2.10%) invalid outcomes were experienced; 44 (3.29%) tests did not run to completion due to power outages.

Conclusion

GeneXpert HIV-1 qualitative and quantitative assay is an accurate test for the diagnosis of HIV in infants and for viral load monitoring. At the point of care, the GeneXpert machine's simple work flow, ease of use and short test turnaround time present the potential to improve access to HIV testing and viral load monitoring. To integrate HIV diagnosis into the existing GeneXpert platforms for TB Diagnosis, there is need to scale up the infrastructure and to change the way work is done.

SUBMITTER: Bwana P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6430374 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Performance and usability of Cepheid GeneXpert HIV-1 qualitative and quantitative assay in Kenya.

Bwana Priska P Ageng'o Joshua J Mwau Matilu M

PloS one 20190322 3

<h4>Background</h4>In Kenya, access to early infant diagnosis and viral load monitoring services for HIV patients on ART is significantly hampered by sample transportation challenges and long turnaround times. Near patient care testing technologies have the potential to obviate such constraints. The Cepheid GeneXpert was launched in 2010 as a TB assay and in 2014 as a potential point of care HIV viral load assay. Whereas it is widely is used for TB in Kenya, its utility for HIV testing has not b ...[more]

PMID: 30901343

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:In sub-Saharan Africa, a third of people starting antiretroviral therapy and majority of patients returning to HIV-care after disengagement, present with advanced HIV disease (ADH), and are at high risk of mortality. Simplified and more affordable point-of-care (POC) diagnostics are required to increase access to prompt CD4 cell count screening for ambulatory and asymptomatic patients. The Visitect CD4 Lateral Flow Assay (LFA) is a disposable POC test, providing a visually interpreted result of above or below 200 CD4cells/mm3. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of this index test. METHODS:Consenting patients above 18years of age and eligible for CD4 testing were enrolled in Nsanje district hospital (Malawi), Gutu mission hospital (Zimbabwe) and Centre hopitalier de Kabinda (DRC). A total of 708 venous blood samples were tested in the index test and in the BD FACSCount assay (reference test method) in the laboratories (Phase 1) to determine diagnostic accuracy. A total of 433 finger-prick (FP) samples were tested on the index test at POC by clinicians (Phase 2) and a self-completed questionnaire was administered to all testers to explore usability of the index test. RESULTS:Among 708 patients, 67.2% were female and median CD4 was 297cells/mm3. The sensitivity of the Visitect CD4 LFA using venous blood in the laboratory was 95.0% [95% CI: 91.3-97.5] and specificity was 81.9% [95% CI: 78.2-85.2%]. Using FP samples, the sensitivity of the Visitect CD4 LFA was 98.3% [95% CI: 95.0-99.6] and specificity was 77.2% [95% CI: 71.6-82.2%]. Usability of the Visitect CD4 LFA was high across the study sites with 97% successfully completed tests. Due to the required specific multiple incubation and procedural steps during the Visitect CD4 LFA testing, few health workers (7/26) were not confident to manage testing whilst multi-tasking in their clinical work. CONCLUSIONS:Visitect CD4 LFA is a promising test for decentralized CD4 screening in resource-limited settings, without access to CD4 testing and and it can trigger prompt management of patients with AHD. Lay health cadres should be considered to conduct Visitect CD4 LFA testing in PHCs as well as coordinating all other POC quality assurance.

Project description:BackgroundDelays in tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis, particularly in prisons, is associated with detrimental outcomes. The new GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay (Xpert) offers accurate and rapid diagnosis of active TB, but its performance in improving case detection in high-transmission congregate settings has yet to be evaluated. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of a single Xpert assay in an intensified case finding survey among HIV-infected prisoners in Malaysia.MethodsHIV-infected prisoners at a single site provided two early-morning sputum specimens to be examined using fluorescence smear microscopy, BACTEC MGIT 960 liquid culture and a single Xpert. The sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of Xpert were calculated relative to gold-standard results using MGIT 960 liquid culture. Relevant clinical and demographic data were used to examine correlates of active TB disease.ResultsThe majority of enrolled subjects with complete data (N=125) were men (90.4%), age <40 years (61.6%) and had injected drugs (75.2%). Median CD4 lymphocyte count was 337 cells/µL (IQR 149-492); only 19 (15.2%) were receiving antiretroviral therapy. Of 15 culture-positive TB cases, single Xpert assay accurately detected only eight previously undiagnosed TB cases, resulting in a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 53.3% (95% CI 30.12-75.2%), 100% (95% CI 96.6-100%), 100% (95% CI 67.56-100%) and 94.0% (95% CI 88.2-97.1%), respectively. Only 1 of 15 (6.7%) active TB cases was smear-positive. The prevalence (12%) of undiagnosed active pulmonary TB (15 of 125 prisoners) was high and associated with longer duration of drug use (AOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03-1.26, for each year of drug use).ConclusionsSingle Xpert assay improved TB case detection and outperformed AFB smear microscopy, but yielded low screening sensitivity. Further examination of the impact of HIV infection on the diagnostic performance of the new assay alongside other screening methods in correctional settings is warranted.

Project description:BackgroundThroughout the Ebola virus disease (EVD) epidemic in West Africa, field laboratory testing for EVD has relied on complex, multi-step real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) assays; an accurate sample-to-answer RT-PCR test would reduce time to results and potentially increase access to testing. We evaluated the performance of the Cepheid GeneXpert Ebola assay on clinical venipuncture whole blood (WB) and buccal swab (BS) specimens submitted to a field biocontainment laboratory in Sierra Leone for routine EVD testing by RT-PCR ("Trombley assay").Methods and findingsThis study was conducted in the Public Health England EVD diagnostic laboratory in Port Loko, Sierra Leone, using residual diagnostic specimens remaining after clinical testing. EDTA-WB specimens (n = 218) were collected from suspected or confirmed EVD patients between April 1 and July 20, 2015. BS specimens (n = 71) were collected as part of a national postmortem screening program between March 7 and July 20, 2015. EDTA-WB and BS specimens were tested with Xpert (targets: glycoprotein [GP] and nucleoprotein [NP] genes) and Trombley (target: NP gene) assays in parallel. All WB specimens were fresh; 84/218 were tested in duplicate on Xpert to compare WB sampling methods (pipette versus swab); 43/71 BS specimens had been previously frozen. In all, 7/218 (3.2%) WB and 7/71 (9.9%) BS samples had Xpert results that were reported as "invalid" or "error" and were excluded, leaving 211 WB and 64 BS samples with valid Trombley and Xpert results. For WB, 22/22 Trombley-positive samples were Xpert-positive (sensitivity 100%, 95% CI 84.6%-100%), and 181/189 Trombley-negative samples were Xpert-negative (specificity 95.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 91.8%-98.2%). Seven of the eight Trombley-negative, Xpert-positive (Xpert cycle threshold [Ct] range 37.7-43.4) WB samples were confirmed to be follow-up submissions from previously Trombley-positive EVD patients, suggesting a revised Xpert specificity of 99.5% (95% CI 97.0%-100%). For Xpert-positive WB samples (n = 22), Xpert NP Ct values were consistently lower than GP Ct values (mean difference -4.06, 95% limits of agreement -6.09, -2.03); Trombley (NP) Ct values closely matched Xpert NP Ct values (mean difference -0.04, 95% limits of agreement -2.93, 2.84). Xpert results (positive/negative) for WB sampled by pipette versus swab were concordant for 78/79 (98.7%) WB samples, with comparable Ct values for positive results. For BS specimens, 20/20 Trombley-positive samples were Xpert-positive (sensitivity 100%, 95% CI 83.2%-100%), and 44/44 Trombley-negative samples were Xpert-negative (specificity 100%, 95% CI 92.0%-100%). This study was limited to testing residual diagnostic samples, some of which had been frozen before use; it was not possible to test the performance of the Xpert Ebola assay at point of care.ConclusionsThe Xpert Ebola assay had excellent performance compared to an established RT-PCR benchmark on WB and BS samples in a field laboratory setting. Future studies should evaluate feasibility and performance outside of a biocontainment laboratory setting to facilitate expanded access to testing.

Dataset Information

Performance and usability of Cepheid GeneXpert HIV-1 qualitative and quantitative assay in Kenya.

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Performance and usability of Cepheid GeneXpert HIV-1 qualitative and quantitative assay in Kenya.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets