Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Rotating hinge knee versus constrained condylar knee in revision total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.


ABSTRACT: There is debate in the literature whether rotating hinge knee (RHK) or constrained condylar knee (CCK) prostheses lead to better clinical outcomes and survival rates in patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the survivorship and clinical outcomes of RHK and CCK prostheses. In this meta-analysis, we reviewed studies that evaluated pain and function scores, range of motion (ROM), complications, and survival rates in patients treated with RHK or CCK with short-term (<5 years) or midterm (5-10 years) follow-up. The survivorship was considered as the time to additional surgical intervention such as removal or revision of the components. A total of 12 studies (one randomized study and 11 non-randomized studies) met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed in detail. The proportion of the knees in which short-term (<5 years) survival rates (RHK, 83/95; CCK, 111/148; odds ratio [OR] 0.52; 95% CI, 0.24-1.11; P = 0.09) and midterm (5-10 years) survival rates (RHK, 104/128; CCK, 196/234; OR 1.05; 95% CI, 0.56-1.97; P = 0.88) were evaluated did not differ significantly between RHK and CCK prostheses. In addition, there were no significant differences in ROM (95% CI: -0.40 to 9.93; P = 0.07) and complication rates (95% CI: 0.66 to 2.49; P = 0.46). In contrast, CCK groups reported significantly better pain score (95% CI: 0.50 to 2.73; P = 0.005) and function score (95% CI: 0.01 to 2.00; P = 0.05) than RHK groups. This meta-analysis revealed that 87.4% of RHK and 75.0% of CCK prostheses survive at short-term (<5 years), while 81.3% of RHK and 83.8% of CCK prostheses survive at midterm (5-10 years). The differences in standardized mean pain and function scores we detected were likely to be imperceptible to patients and almost certainly below the minimum clinically important level, despite a significant difference in both groups. Based on the findings of the current meta-analysis, RHK prostheses continue to be an option in complex RTKA with reasonable midterm survivorship.

SUBMITTER: Yoon JR 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6433230 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Rotating hinge knee versus constrained condylar knee in revision total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.

Yoon Jung-Ro JR   Cheong Ji-Young JY   Im Jung-Taek JT   Park Phil-Sun PS   Park Jae-Ok JO   Shin Young-Soo YS  

PloS one 20190325 3


There is debate in the literature whether rotating hinge knee (RHK) or constrained condylar knee (CCK) prostheses lead to better clinical outcomes and survival rates in patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty (RTKA). The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the survivorship and clinical outcomes of RHK and CCK prostheses. In this meta-analysis, we reviewed studies that evaluated pain and function scores, range of motion (ROM), complications, and survival rates in patients tre  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8028074 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5264581 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8167321 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7461261 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8666608 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7083710 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6746286 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8661104 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5522503 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC8167323 | biostudies-literature