Dataset Information

The accuracy of computed tomography scans for rapid prototyping of canine skulls.

ABSTRACT: This study's objective was to determine the accuracy of using current computed tomography (CT) scan and software techniques for rapid prototyping by quantifying the margin of error between CT models and laser scans of canine skull specimens. Twenty canine skulls of varying morphology were selected from an anatomy collection at a veterinary school. CT scans (bone and standard algorithms) were performed for each skull, and data segmented (testing two lower threshold settings of 226HU and -650HU) into 3-D CT models. Laser scans were then performed on each skull. The CT models were compared to the corresponding laser scan to determine the error generated from the different types of CT model parameters. This error was then compared between the different types of CT models to determine the most accurate parameters. The mean errors for the 226HU CT models, both bone and standard algorithms, were not significant from zero error (p = 0.1076 and p = 0.0580, respectively). The mean errors for both -650HU CT models were significant from zero error (p < 0.001). Significant differences were detected between CT models for 3 CT model comparisons: Bone (p < 0.0001); Standard (p < 0.0001); and -650HU (p < 0.0001). For 226HU CT models, a significant difference was not detected between CT models (p = 0.2268). Independent of the parameters tested, the 3-D models derived from CT imaging accurately represent the real skull dimensions, with CT models differing less than 0.42 mm from the real skull dimensions. The 226HU threshold was more accurate than the -650HU threshold. For the 226HU CT models, accuracy was not dependent on the CT algorithm. For the -650 CT models, bone was more accurate than standard algorithms. Knowing the inherent error of this procedure is important for use in 3-D printing for surgical planning and medical education.

SUBMITTER: Comrie ML

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6433237 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The accuracy of computed tomography scans for rapid prototyping of canine skulls.

Comrie Michaela L ML Monteith Gabrielle G Zur Linden Alex A Oblak Michelle M Phillips John J James Fiona M K FMK

PloS one 20190325 3

This study's objective was to determine the accuracy of using current computed tomography (CT) scan and software techniques for rapid prototyping by quantifying the margin of error between CT models and laser scans of canine skull specimens. Twenty canine skulls of varying morphology were selected from an anatomy collection at a veterinary school. CT scans (bone and standard algorithms) were performed for each skull, and data segmented (testing two lower threshold settings of 226HU and -650HU) i ...[more]

PMID: 30908536

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPancreatic perfusion computed tomography (CT) imaging is increasingly used for neoplastic grading, predicting prognosis, and evaluating the response to therapy. To optimize the clinical pancreatic CT perfusion imaging methods, we evaluated 2 different CT scanning protocols concerning pancreas perfusion parameters.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on 40 patients who underwent whole pancreas CT perfusion scanning in The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. Of these 40 patients, 20 patients in group A underwent continuous perfusion scanning, while 20 patients in group B underwent intermittent perfusion scanning. For group A, continuous axial scanning was performed 25 times, and the total scan time was 50 s. For group B, arterial phase helical perfusion scanning was performed 8 times, and then venous phase helical perfusion scanning was performed 15 times, with a total scan time of 64.6 to 70.0 s. A comprehensive list of perfusion parameters between different parts of the pancreas and the 2 groups were compared. The effective radiation dose for the 2 scanning methods was analyzed.ResultsThe parameter of the mean slope of increase (MSI) at different pancreatic parts in group A differed (P=0.028). The pancreas head had the lowest value, and the tail had the highest (about a 20% difference). In group A compared to group B, the blood volume of the pancreatic head was smaller (15.256±2.925 vs. 16.953±3.602), the positive enhanced integral was smaller (0.307±0.050 vs. 0.344±0.060) and the permeability surface was larger (34.205±9. 612 vs. 24.377±8.413); the blood volume of the pancreatic neck was smaller (13.940±2.691 vs. 17.173±3.918), the positive enhanced integral was smaller (0.304±0.088 vs. 0.361±0.051) and the permeability surface was larger (34.898±11.592 vs. 25. 794±8.149); the blood volume of the pancreatic body was smaller (16.142±4.006 vs. 18.401±2.513), the positive enhanced integral was smaller (0.305±0.093 vs. 0.342±0.048) and the permeability surface was larger (28.861±10.448 vs. 22.158±6. 017); the blood volume of the pancreatic tail was smaller (16.446±3.709 vs. 17.374±3.781), the positive enhanced integral was smaller (0.304±0.057 vs. 0.350±0.073) and the permeability surface was larger (27.823±8.228 vs. 21.509±7.768) (P<0.05). The effective radiation dose in the intermittent scan mode was slightly lower at 16.657±2.259 mSv than in the continuous scan mode (17.973±3.698 mSv).ConclusionsDifferent CT scanning intervals had a significant influence on whole pancreas blood volume, permeability surface, and positive enhanced integral. These demonstrate the high sensitivity of intermittent perfusion scanning for identifying perfusion abnormalities. Therefore, for the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases, intermittent pancreatic CT perfusion may be more advantageous.

Project description:ImportanceThe American College of Radiology (ACR) has recognized the importance of minimizing radiation doses used for lung cancer screening (LCS) computed tomography (CT). However, without standard protocols, doses could still be unnecessarily high, reducing screening margin of benefit.ObjectiveTo characterize LCS CT radiation doses and identify factors explaining variation.Design, setting, and participantsWe prospectively collected LCS examination dose metrics, from 2016 to 2017, at US institutions in the University of California, San Francisco International Dose Registry. Institution-level factors were collected through baseline survey. Mixed-effects linear and logistic regression models were estimated using forward variable selection. Results are presented as percentage excess dose and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The analysis was conducted between 2018 and 2019.Main outcomes and measuresLog-transformed measures of (1) mean volume CT dose index (CTDIvol, mGy), reflecting the average radiation dose per slice; (2) mean effective dose (ED, mSv), reflecting the total dose received and estimated future cancer risk; (3) proportion of CT scans using radiation doses above ACR benchmarks (CTDIvol >3 mGy, ED >1 mSv); and (4) proportion of CT scans using radiation doses above 75th percentile of registry doses (CTDIvol >2.7 mGy, ED >1.4 mSv).ResultsData were collected for 12 529 patients undergoing LCS CT scans performed at 72 institutions. Overall, 7232 participants (58%) were men, and the median age was 65 years (interquartile range [IQR], 60-70). Of 72 institutions, 15 (21%) had median CTDIvol and 47 (65%) had median ED above ACR guidelines. Institutions allowing any radiologists to establish protocols had 44% higher mean CTDIvol (mean dose difference [MDD], 44%; 95% CI, 19%-69%) and 27% higher mean ED (MDD, 27%; 95% CI, 5%-50%) vs those limiting who established protocols. Institutions allowing any radiologist to establish protocols had higher odds of examinations exceeding ACR CTDIvol guidelines (OR, 12.0; 95% CI, 2.0-71.4), and 75th percentile of registry CTDIvol (OR, 19.0; 95% CI, 1.9-186.7) or ED (OR, 8.5; 95% CI, 1.7-42.9). Having lead radiologists establish protocols resulted in lower odds of doses exceeding ACR ED guidelines (OR, 0.01; 95% CI, 0.001-0.1). Employing external vs internal medical physicists was associated with increased odds of exceeding ACR CTDIvol guidelines (OR, 6.1; 95% CI, 1.8-20.8). Having medical physicists establish protocols was associated with decreased odds of exceeding 75th percentile of registry CTDIvol (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.59). Institutions reporting protocol updates as needed had 27% higher mean CTDIvol (MDD, 27%; 95% CI, 8%-45%).Conclusions and relevanceFacilities varied in LCS CT radiation dose distributions. Institutions limiting protocol creation to lead radiologists and having internal medical physicists had lower doses.

Project description:This work concerns computed tomography (CT)-based cardiac functional analysis (CFA) with a reduced radiation dose. As CT-CFA requires images over the entire heartbeat, the scans are often performed at 10-20% of the tube current settings that are typically used for coronary CT angiography. A large image noise then degrades the accuracy of motion estimation. Moreover, even if the scan was performed during the sinus rhythm, the cardiac motion observed in CT images may not be cyclic with patients with atrial fibrillation. In this study, we propose to use two CT scan data, one for CT angiography at a quiescent phase at a standard dose and the other for CFA over the entire heart beat at a lower dose.We have made the following four modifications to an image-based cardiac motion estimation method we have previously developed for a full-dose retrospectively gated coronary CT angiography: (a) a full-dose prospectively gated coronary CT angiography image acquired at the least motion phase was used as the reference image; (b) a three-dimensional median filter was applied to lower-dose retrospectively gated cardiac images acquired at 20 phases over one heartbeat in order to reduce image noise; (c) the strength of the temporal regularization term was made adaptive; and (d) a one-dimensional temporal filter was applied to the estimated motion vector field in order to decrease jaggy motion patterns. We describe the conventional method iME1 and the proposed method iME2 in this article. Five observers assessed the accuracy of the estimated motion vector field of iME2 and iME1 using a 4-point scale. The observers repeated the assessment with data presented in a new random order 1 week after the first assessment session.The study confirmed that the proposed iME2 was robust against the mismatch of noise levels, contrast enhancement levels, and shapes of the chambers. There was a statistically significant difference between iME2 and iME1 (accuracy score, 2.08 ± 0.81 versus 2.77 ± 0.98, P < 0.01) and the improvement by the score of + 0.69 seemed clinically relevant. Inter-observer concordance was good: The inter-class correlation coefficient was 0.63 and Kendall's rank correlation coefficients were in the range of 0.41-0.67 (P < 0.01), respectively. Intra-observer reproducibility between sessions was good with the inter-class correlation coefficient of 0.76.We have proposed iME2 method for CT-CFA with two CT scans. The observer study verified the robustness and accuracy of iME2 method and its improved performance over iME1 method.

Dataset Information

The accuracy of computed tomography scans for rapid prototyping of canine skulls.

Publications

The accuracy of computed tomography scans for rapid prototyping of canine skulls.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets