Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Endovascular and Clinical Outcomes of Vertebrobasilar Intracranial Atherosclerosis-Related Large Vessel Occlusion.


ABSTRACT: Background and Purpose: Endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute vertebrobasilar intracranial atherosclerosis-related large vessel occlusion (ICAS-LVO) and its outcomes are not well known. We aimed to evaluate endovascular and clinical outcomes of vertebrobasilar ICAS-LVO patients who underwent EVT. Methods: Consecutive acute stroke patients who underwent EVT for vertebrobasilar LVO were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were assigned to the ICAS (+) or the ICAS (-) group based on angiographical findings. Procedural details and clinical outcomes were compared between the ICAS (+) and ICAS (-) groups. Results: This study included 77 patients with acute vertebrobasilar LVO who underwent EVT. Among the study subjects, 24 (31.2%) had an ICAS-LVO. Recanalization was achieved in 19 patients in the ICAS (+) group (79.2%), which was comparable with the ICAS (-) group (84.9%; p = 0.529). However, recanalization using conventional endovascular modalities (stent retriever thrombectomy, contact aspiration thrombectomy, or intra-arterial urokinase infusion) was less successful in the ICAS (+) group (36.8%) than the ICAS (-) group (100.0%; p < 0.001). All the remaining patients in the ICAS (+) group required specific rescue treatments appropriate for ICAS, including balloon angioplasty, stenting, or intra-arterial glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor infusion to obtain a successful recanalization. Procedural time was not significantly longer in the ICAS (+) group. The rates of favorable outcomes (37.5% vs. 41.5%; p = 0.740), death, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage were not significantly different between the groups. Conclusion: ICAS-LVO was common in patients who underwent EVT for acute vertebrobasilar LVO. Although conventional modalities were often ineffective for vertebrobasilar ICAS-LVO, a comparable recanalization rate could be obtained with ICAS-specific modalities. Recanalization rate and procedural time were comparable, and clinical outcomes did not differ between patients with or without ICAS-LVO.

SUBMITTER: Baek JH 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6433872 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Endovascular and Clinical Outcomes of Vertebrobasilar Intracranial Atherosclerosis-Related Large Vessel Occlusion.

Baek Jang-Hyun JH   Kim Byung Moon BM   Heo Ji Hoe JH   Kim Dong Joon DJ   Nam Hyo Suk HS   Kim Young Dae YD  

Frontiers in neurology 20190319


<b>Background and Purpose:</b> Endovascular treatment (EVT) for acute vertebrobasilar intracranial atherosclerosis-related large vessel occlusion (ICAS-LVO) and its outcomes are not well known. We aimed to evaluate endovascular and clinical outcomes of vertebrobasilar ICAS-LVO patients who underwent EVT. <b>Methods:</b> Consecutive acute stroke patients who underwent EVT for vertebrobasilar LVO were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were assigned to the ICAS (+) or the ICAS (-) group based on a  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10844212 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7564225 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8477850 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6186924 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9326078 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9909103 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6390807 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10334174 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9581226 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5780400 | biostudies-literature