Dataset Information

Talk2Me: Automated linguistic data collection for personal assessment.

ABSTRACT: Language is one the earliest capacities affected by cognitive change. To monitor that change longitudinally, we have developed a web portal for remote linguistic data acquisition, called Talk2Me, consisting of a variety of tasks. In order to facilitate research in different aspects of language, we provide baselines including the relations between different scoring functions within and across tasks. These data can be used to augment studies that require a normative model; for example, we provide baseline classification results in identifying dementia. These data are released publicly along with a comprehensive open-source package for extracting approximately two thousand lexico-syntactic, acoustic, and semantic features. This package can be applied arbitrarily to studies that include linguistic data. To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive publicly available software for extracting linguistic features. The software includes scoring functions for different tasks.

SUBMITTER: Komeili M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6436678 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Talk2Me: Automated linguistic data collection for personal assessment.

Komeili Majid M Pou-Prom Chloé C Liaqat Daniyal D Fraser Kathleen C KC Yancheva Maria M Rudzicz Frank F

PloS one 20190327 3

Language is one the earliest capacities affected by cognitive change. To monitor that change longitudinally, we have developed a web portal for remote linguistic data acquisition, called Talk2Me, consisting of a variety of tasks. In order to facilitate research in different aspects of language, we provide baselines including the relations between different scoring functions within and across tasks. These data can be used to augment studies that require a normative model; for example, we provide ...[more]

PMID: 30917120

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceWomen are underrepresented at higher ranks in academic medicine. However, the factors contributing to this disparity have not been fully elucidated. Implicit bias and unconscious mental attitudes toward a person or group may be factors. Although academic medical centers use physician trainee evaluations of faculty to inform promotion decisions, little is known about gender bias in these evaluations. To date, no studies have examined narrative evaluations of medical faculty by physician trainees for differences based on gender.ObjectiveTo characterize gender-associated linguistic differences in narrative evaluations of medical faculty written by physician trainees.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective cohort study included all faculty teaching evaluations completed for the department of medicine faculty by medical students, residents, and fellows at a large academic center in Pennsylvania from July 1, 2015, through June 30, 2016. Data analysis was performed from June 1, 2018, through July 31, 2018.Main outcomes and measuresWord use in faculty evaluations was quantified using automated text mining by converting free-text comments into unique 1- and 2-word phrases. Mixed-effects logistic regression analysis was performed to assess associations of faculty gender with frequencies of specific words and phrases present in a physician trainee evaluation.ResultsA total of 7326 unique evaluations were collected for 521 faculty (325 men [62.4%] and 196 women [37.6%]). The individual words art (odds ratio [OR], 7.78; 95% CI, 1.01-59.89), trials (OR, 4.43; 95% CI, 1.34-14.69), master (OR, 4.24; 95% CI, 1.69-10.63), and humor (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.44-3.73) were significantly associated with evaluations of male faculty, whereas the words empathetic (OR, 4.34; 95% CI, 1.56-12.07), delight (OR, 4.26; 95% CI, 1.35-13.40), and warm (OR, 3.45; 95% CI, 1.83-6.49) were significantly associated with evaluations of female faculty. Two-word phrases associated with male faculty evaluations included run rounds (OR, 7.78; 95% CI, 1.01-59.84), big picture (OR, 7.15; 95% CI, 1.68-30.42), and master clinician (OR, 4.02; 95% CI, 1.21-13.36), whereas evaluations of female faculty were more likely to be associated with model physician (OR, 7.75; 95% CI, 1.70-35.39), just right (OR, 6.97; 95% CI, 1.51-32.30), and attention (to) detail (OR, 4.26; 95% CI, 1.36-13.40).Conclusions and relevanceThe data showed quantifiable linguistic differences between free-text comments about male and female faculty in physician trainee evaluations. Further evaluation of these differences, particularly in association with ongoing gender disparities in faculty promotion and retention, may be warranted.

Project description:BackgroundThe American Society for Clinical Oncology recently launched the minimal common oncology data elements project to facilitate cancer data interoperability. However, clinical data are often unrecorded in an organized way, and converting them into a structured format can be time-consuming. Clinical Data Warehouse (CDW) is a database that consolidates data from different clinical sources. However, the clinical data extracted from this database include not only structured data but also natural language generated during clinical practice. Therefore, applying these data to a clinical study is challenging because they are unstructured, and unformatted to allow essential content to be found. This study determined how best to organize a huge amount of clinical data to evaluate the upper aerodigestive tract cancers' clinical features and outcomes, including cancer of the head and neck, esophagus, lung, thymus, and mesothelioma.MethodsThe Real-time autOmatically updated data warehOuse in healThcare (ROOT) uses six main regions to describe the journey of cancer patients. This study, developed an algorithm optimized for each disease category using natural language processing of unstructured data and data capture of structured data. Data from patients diagnosed at the Samsung Medical Center from 2008-2020 were used.ResultsComprehensive clinical data for 67,617 patients across six tumor types: 28,954 with non-small-cell lung cancer, 2,540 with small-cell lung cancer, 30,035 with head and neck cancer, 4,950 with esophageal cancer, 966 with thymic cancer, and 172 with mesothelioma were collected. Additionally, the results of a longitudinal molecular study, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tests, and next-generation sequencing (NGS), were included. Scattered information was integrated and automatically built up to match the cohort, allowing users to capture the most updated test results and treatment outcomes.ConclusionsThis landmark study documented the successful construction of a real-time updating system for medical big data, based on the CDW program.

Project description:BackgroundHealth care and public health professionals rely on accurate, real-time monitoring of infectious diseases for outbreak preparedness and response. Early detection of outbreaks is improved by systems that are comprehensive and specific with respect to the pathogen but are rapid in reporting the data. It has proven difficult to implement these requirements on a large scale while maintaining patient privacy.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to demonstrate the automated export, aggregation, and analysis of infectious disease diagnostic test results from clinical laboratories across the United States in a manner that protects patient confidentiality. We hypothesized that such a system could aid in monitoring the seasonal occurrence of respiratory pathogens and may have advantages with regard to scope and ease of reporting compared with existing surveillance systems.MethodsWe describe a system, BioFire Syndromic Trends, for rapid disease reporting that is syndrome-based but pathogen-specific. Deidentified patient test results from the BioFire FilmArray multiplex molecular diagnostic system are sent directly to a cloud database. Summaries of these data are displayed in near real time on the Syndromic Trends public website. We studied this dataset for the prevalence, seasonality, and coinfections of the 20 respiratory pathogens detected in over 362,000 patient samples acquired as a standard-of-care testing over the last 4 years from 20 clinical laboratories in the United States.ResultsThe majority of pathogens show influenza-like seasonality, rhinovirus has fall and spring peaks, and adenovirus and the bacterial pathogens show constant detection over the year. The dataset can also be considered in an ecological framework; the viruses and bacteria detected by this test are parasites of a host (the human patient). Interestingly, the rate of pathogen codetections, on average 7.94% (28,741/362,101), matches predictions based on the relative abundance of organisms present.ConclusionsSyndromic Trends preserves patient privacy by removing or obfuscating patient identifiers while still collecting much useful information about the bacterial and viral pathogens that they harbor. Test results are uploaded to the database within a few hours of completion compared with delays of up to 10 days for other diagnostic-based reporting systems. This work shows that the barriers to establishing epidemiology systems are no longer scientific and technical but rather administrative, involving questions of patient privacy and data ownership. We have demonstrated here that these barriers can be overcome. This first look at the resulting data stream suggests that Syndromic Trends will be able to provide high-resolution analysis of circulating respiratory pathogens and may aid in the detection of new outbreaks.

Dataset Information

Talk2Me: Automated linguistic data collection for personal assessment.

Publications

Talk2Me: Automated linguistic data collection for personal assessment.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets