Dataset Information

Aspiration of Tri-folded, Endothelium-In Grafts for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

ABSTRACT: PURPOSE:In Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), loading and positioning of tri-folded grafts into a cartridge is generally conducted with forceps or a hook, risking graft tear or trauma. We demonstrate the feasibility of loading tri-folded grafts into a cartridge with no touch to the endothelium required beyond the tri-folding process. METHODS:A corneoscleral rim with a prestripped DMEK graft is placed into a petri dish. After the graft is tri-folded with forceps and removed from its stromal attachment, the graft is gently wicked into the tip of a saline-filled Alcon B IOL cartridge connected to IV extension tubing and a 3 cc syringe, drawn into the cartridge by positioning it adjacent to the graft tip. The remainder of the graft is aspirated with the addition of saline. The cartridge orientation is reversed for graft injection. In this retrospective analysis, we analyzed surgical videos for preparation times, and assessed postoperative visual acuity, pachymetry, and endothelial cell density. RESULTS:Thirteen cases underwent this approach. Median preparation time from stain to cartridge eye contact was 8.5 minutes, and time from graft injection to final centration and bubbling was 2.9 minutes. Corneal thickness decreased from a median of 623 microns preoperatively to 566 ?m at 1 month (P = 0.038). Visual acuity improved by 1 month by a median of 0.3 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (P = 0.016). Endothelial cell density decreased by 32.4% at 1 month compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS:Endothelium-in DMEK grafts may be loaded into a plastic cartridge using a skill set similar to aspiration of a scroll.

SUBMITTER: Karakus S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6443421 | biostudies-literature | 2019 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Aspiration of Tri-folded, Endothelium-In Grafts for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Karakus Sezen S Ighani Mehrnaz M Noparat Puntakarn P Tofigh Marjan M Chiang Eric E Barnes Kali K Chen Conan Y CY Liu Tiffany S TS Eghrari Allen O AO

Cornea 20190501 5

<h4>Purpose</h4>In Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), loading and positioning of tri-folded grafts into a cartridge is generally conducted with forceps or a hook, risking graft tear or trauma. We demonstrate the feasibility of loading tri-folded grafts into a cartridge with no touch to the endothelium required beyond the tri-folding process.<h4>Methods</h4>A corneoscleral rim with a prestripped DMEK graft is placed into a petri dish. After the graft is tri-folded with forceps and ...[more]

PMID: 30702471

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWe evaluated the visual outcomes and complications of "endothelium-out" and "endothelium-in" Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft insertion techniques.Materials and methodsElectronic searches were conducted in CENTRAL, Cochrane databases, PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov. Study designs included clinical trials, comparative observational studies, and large case series (≥25 eyes). PRISMA guidelines were used for abstracting data and synthesis. Random-effects models were employed for meta-analyses.Results21,323 eyes (95 studies) were included. Eighty-six studies reported on "endothelium-out" techniques; eight studies reported on "endothelium-in" techniques. One study compared "endothelium-out" to "endothelium-in" techniques. Eighteen "endothelium-out" studies reported that 42.5-85% of eyes achieved best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥20/25 at 6 months; pooled proportion of eyes achieving BCVA ≥20/25 at 6 months was 58.7% (95% CI 49.4-67.7%,15 studies). Three "endothelium-in" studies reported that 44.7-87.5% of eyes achieved BCVA of ≥20/25 at 6 months; pooled proportion of eyes achieving BCVA ≥20/25 at 6 months was 62.4% (95% CI 33.9-86.9%). Pooled mean endothelial cell loss was lower in the "endothelium-in" studies (28.1 ± 1.3%, 7 studies) compared to "endothelium-out" studies (36.3 ± 6.9%,10 studies) at 6 months (p = 0.018). Graft re-bubbling rates were higher in the "endothelium-out" studies (26.2%, 95% CI 21.9-30.9%, 74 studies) compared to "endothelium-in" studies (16.5%, 95% CI 8.5-26.4%, 6 studies), although statistical significance was not reached (p = 0.440). Primary graft failure rates were comparable between the two groups (p = 0.552). Quality of evidence was considered low and significant heterogeneity existed amongst the studies.ConclusionReported rates of endothelial cell loss were lower in "endothelium-in" DMEK studies at 6 months compared to "endothelium-out" studies. Outcomes of "endothelium-in" techniques were otherwise comparable to those reported in "endothelium-out" studies. Given the technical challenges encountered in "endothelium-out" procedures, surgeons may consider "endothelium-in" techniques designed for easier intra-operative DMEK graft unfolding. "Endothelium-in" studies evaluating outcomes at longer time points are required before conclusive comparisons between the two techniques can be drawn.

Dataset Information

Aspiration of Tri-folded, Endothelium-In Grafts for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Publications

Aspiration of Tri-folded, Endothelium-In Grafts for Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets