Dataset Information

Risk of ischemic placental disease in fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the association of fresh and frozen embryo transfer with the development of ischemic placental disease (IPD), hypothesizing that differences in implantation environment affect placentation and thus pregnancy outcomes. DESIGN:We performed a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study of deliveries linked to IVF cycles. SETTING:Tertiary hospital and infertility treatment center. PATIENT(S):We included all women who underwent an autologous IVF cycle and had a live-born infant or an intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD). We excluded women less than 18 years of age. INTERVENTION(S):We compared pregnancies resulting from frozen embryo transfer (frozen) cycles with those resulting from fresh embryo transfer (fresh) cycles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S):The primary outcome was a composite outcome of IPD or IUFD due to placental insufficiency. Ischemic placental disease included pre-eclampsia, placental abruption, and small for gestational age (SGA). We calculated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULT(S):Compared with fresh cycles, frozen cycles had a lower risk of IPD or IUFD from placental insufficiency (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59-0.97). Frozen cycles also conferred a lower risk of SGA than fresh cycles (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.41-0.81). Risks of pre-eclampsia (RR 1.3, 95% CI 0.84-1.9) and abruption (RR 1.2, 95% CI 0.56-2.4) were similar. CONCLUSION(S):There was a lower risk of IPD among frozen cycles compared with fresh cycles. This association was largely driven by lower risk of SGA among frozen cycles.

SUBMITTER: Johnson KM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6443502 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Risk of ischemic placental disease in fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles.

Johnson Katherine M KM Hacker Michele R MR Resetkova Nina N O'Brien Barbara B Modest Anna M AM

Fertility and sterility 20190228 4

<h4>Objectives</h4>To evaluate the association of fresh and frozen embryo transfer with the development of ischemic placental disease (IPD), hypothesizing that differences in implantation environment affect placentation and thus pregnancy outcomes.<h4>Design</h4>We performed a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study of deliveries linked to IVF cycles.<h4>Setting</h4>Tertiary hospital and infertility treatment center.<h4>Patient(s)</h4>We included all women who underwent an autologous ...[more]

PMID: 30826115

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and Objectives: Although considerable research has been devoted to examining the distinctions between fresh and frozen embryo transfer regarding obstetric outcomes and rates of pregnancy success, there is still a scarcity of thorough analyses that specifically examine neonatal outcomes. The objective of our study was to provide an in-depth analysis of neonatal outcomes that occur after the transfer of fresh and frozen embryos (ET vs. FET) in IVF/ICSI cycles. Materials and Methods: Multiple databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wiley, Scopus, Ovid and Science Direct) were searched from January 1980 to February 2024. Two reviewers conducted the article identification and data extraction, meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. The methodological quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) or the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Results: Twenty studies, including 171,481 participants in total, were subjected to qualitative and quantitative analyses. A significant increase in preterm birth rates was noted with fresh embryo transfer compared to FET in the overall IVF/ICSI population (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.18-1.35, p < 0.00001), as well as greater odds of a low birth weight (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.27-1.48, p < 0.00001) and small-for-gestational-age infants in this group (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.63-2.00, p < 0.00001). In contrast, frozen embryo transfer can result in macrosomic (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.54-0.65, p < 0.00001) or large-for-gestational-age infants (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.60-0.69, p < 0.00001). No significant difference was observed regarding congenital malformations or neonatal death rates. Conclusions: This systematic review confirmed that singleton babies conceived by frozen embryo transfer are at lower risk of preterm delivery, low birthweight and being small for gestational age than their counterparts conceived by fresh embryo transfer. The data support embryo cryopreservation but suggest that elective freezing should be limited to cases with a proven indication or within the framework of a clinical study.

Project description:BACKGROUND:It is not known whether segmentation of an in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycle, with freezing of all embryos prior to transfer, increases the chance of a live birth after all embryos are transferred. METHODS:In a prospective study of UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority data, we investigated the impact of segmentation, compared with initial fresh embryo followed by frozen embryo transfers, on live birth rate and perinatal outcomes. We used generalised linear models to assess the effect of segmentation in the whole cohort, with additional analyses within women who had experienced both segmentation and non-segmentation. We compared rates of live birth, low birthweight (LBW <?2.5?kg), preterm birth (<?37?weeks), macrosomia (>?4?kg), small for gestational age (SGA <?10th centile), and large for gestational age (LGA >?90th centile) for a given ovarian stimulation cycle accounting for all embryo transfers. RESULTS:We assessed 202,968 women undergoing 337,148 ovarian stimulation cycles and 399,896 embryo transfer procedures. Live birth rates were similar in unadjusted analyses for segmented and non-segmented cycles (rate ratio 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08) but lower in segmented cycles when adjusted for age, cycle number, cause of infertility, and ovarian response (rate ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.78-0.83). Segmented cycles were associated with increased risk of macrosomia (adjusted risk ratio 1.72, 95% CI 1.55-1.92) and LGA (1.51, 1.38-1.66) but lower risk of LBW (0.71, 0.65-0.78) and SGA (0.64, 0.56-0.72). With adjustment for blastocyst/cleavage-stage embryo transfer in those with data on this (329,621?cycles), results were not notably changed. Similar results were observed comparing segmented to non-segmented within 3261 women who had both and when analyses were repeated excluding multiple embryo cycles and multiple pregnancies. When analyses were restricted to women with a single embryo transfer, the transfer of a frozen-thawed embryo in a segmented cycles was no longer associated with a lower risk of LBW (0.97, 0.71-1.33) or SGA (0.84, 0.61-1.15), but the risk of macrosomia (1.74, 1.39-2.20) and LGA (1.49, 1.20-1.86) persisted. When the analyses for perinatal outcomes were further restricted to solely frozen embryo transfers, there was no strong statistical evidence for associations. CONCLUSIONS:Widespread application of segmentation and freezing of all embryos to unselected patient populations may be associated with lower cumulative live birth rates and should be restricted to those with a clinical indication.

Dataset Information

Risk of ischemic placental disease in fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles.

Publications

Risk of ischemic placental disease in fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets