Dataset Information

Prevalence of Drug Prescriptions and Potential Safety in Patients with Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Real-World Study.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Patients with cirrhosis are at risk for adverse drug reactions (ADRs) due to altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. We aimed to determine the prevalence of drug prescriptions and the potential safety of these prescriptions in a real-world cohort of patients with cirrhosis.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study based on linked real-world data from the Out-patient Pharmacy Database and the Hospitalisation Database of the PHARMO Database Network. Patients with a diagnosis of cirrhosis between January 1998 and December 2015 were included. Follow-up ended when the patient underwent a liver transplant, died, transferred out of the database, or on 31 December 2015. Prescription data were derived from a community pharmacy database and were compared with our previously developed safety recommendations for 209 drugs.

Results

In total, 5618 patients were included and followed for a median of 3 years (interquartile range [IQR] 1-7). In the first year after the diagnosis, patients used a median of nine drugs (IQR 5-14), with proton pump inhibitors (prevalence 53.9%), aldosterone antagonists (43.6%), and sulfonamide diuretics (41.3%) being the most commonly used drug groups. Almost half (48.3%) of 102,927 prescriptions consisted of drugs with a safety recommendation. The prevalence of potentially unsafe drug use was 60.0% during the total follow-up. Three nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were among the five most commonly used potentially unsafe drugs.

Conclusions

Patients with cirrhosis use a large number of drugs. Almost two-thirds of patients in our cohort used potentially unsafe drugs. To prevent ADRs in these frail patients, personalised pharmacotherapy is necessary.

SUBMITTER: Weersink RA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6450857 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prevalence of Drug Prescriptions and Potential Safety in Patients with Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Real-World Study.

Weersink Rianne A RA Taxis Katja K Drenth Joost P H JPH Houben Eline E Metselaar Herold J HJ Borgsteede Sander D SD

Drug safety 20190401 4

<h4>Introduction</h4>Patients with cirrhosis are at risk for adverse drug reactions (ADRs) due to altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. We aimed to determine the prevalence of drug prescriptions and the potential safety of these prescriptions in a real-world cohort of patients with cirrhosis.<h4>Methods</h4>This was a retrospective cohort study based on linked real-world data from the Out-patient Pharmacy Database and the Hospitalisation Database of the PHARMO Database Network. Patients ...[more]

PMID: 30357649

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundProprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors effectively reduce LDL cholesterol and adverse cardiovascular events with a safety profile comparable to a placebo. Limited real-world data exists on their effectiveness in different patient groups. This study evaluated evolocumab's efficacy and safety in hypercholesteremia patients with and without diabetes.MethodIn a large tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia, patients aged 18 and above who initiated evolocumab therapy were screened for eligibility between January 2017 and July 2023. All patients who had been on maximally tolerated statin and ezetimibe therapy for at least 4 months before starting evolocumab were included. The included participants were then divided into diabetic and non-diabetic groups and assessed for evolocumab's efficacy and safety. Efficacy was measured by LDL-C reduction and target achievement, while safety was assessed by examining glycemic control changes, new-onset diabetes (NOD) and hepatic enzyme levels. Data analysis included descriptive and comparative methods, with significance set at p < 0.05.ResultsA total of 151 patients were included, with an average age of 51.77 years. The majority of patients were male (67.6%) and obese (81.5%). Around 55% had diabetes, and 63% had established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease at baseline. During a mean follow-up period of 13.17 months, the average reduction in LDL-C from baseline was - 34.21, - 28.66, and - 39.61% for the overall cohort, non-diabetic patients, and diabetic patients, respectively. In the overall cohort, 34.4 and 24.5% reached the target LDL-C levels of less than 1.4 mmol/L (55 mg/dL) and less than 1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL), respectively. Worsening of glycemic control (HbA1C increase > 0.5) was observed in 25.83% of the overall cohort, 16.18% of non-diabetics, and 33.74% of diabetics. An HbA1C increase > 1 was observed in 13.25% of the overall cohort, 2.94% in non-diabetics and 21.69% in diabetics. Five patients (3.3%) developed NOD.ConclusionThe study demonstrated that the addition of evolocumab to maximally tolerated statin and ezetimibe therapy reduced LDL-C levels but with a smaller average reduction and a lower proportion of patients achieving recommended LDL-C targets than in landmark clinical trials. Additionally, there was a potential negative effect on glycemic control, warranting further investigation.

Project description:Background & aimsLong-term albumin (LTA) is currently standard of care for patients with decompensated cirrhosis in many Italian hepatology centres. In this real-life study, we aimed to describe patient, logistical and treatment-related characteristics in daily clinical practice and to identify predictors of response.MethodsWe performed a multicentre, retrospective, observational study in patients with cirrhosis and ascites receiving LTA between 01/2016 and 02/2022 and followed until death, TIPS (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt) placement, transplantation or 02/2023.ResultsA total of 312 patients, the majority with alcohol-related cirrhosis, were included. At baseline, median Child-Pugh, MELD, and MELD-Na were 8, 15, and 18, respectively. Ascites was grade 2 in 55% of patients, grade 3 in 35% and refractory in 27%, while 47% had received large volume paracentesis in the previous 6 months. Median LTA was 10 months with a median dose of 40 g/week. Ascites resolved to grade 0-1 in 34% of patients within the first 3 months and 56% by the end of treatment. Predictors of ascites resolution were age (p = 0.007), baseline grade of ascites (p = 0.007), no paracentesis in the previous 6 months (p = 0.001), aetiological treatment in the past 12 months or during LTA (p = 0.005), weekly albumin dose (p = 0.014) and serum albumin concentration of 40 g/L after 1 month of treatment (p = 0.017). Of the 83 patients with refractory ascites at inclusion, 26% had grade 0/1 ascites at the last observation. No severe albumin-related side-effects were reported and only 1% discontinued for logistical reasons.ConclusionsLTA is feasible as an outpatient treatment for the management of ascites. In the current study, ascites resolved in more than half of patients receiving LTA on top of diuretics, including in some with refractory ascites. Predictors of response to LTA provide useful information for tailoring treatment.Impact and implicationsThe ANSWER randomised-controlled trial has shown that long-term albumin treatment (LTA) is an effective approach for the management of patients with cirrhosis and ascites. This observational study provides novel information on target patients, modalities and length of treatment, predictors of ascites resolution, stopping criteria, and clinical trajectories of patients on treatment. LTA is a feasible option in the daily clinical practice for the management of ascites when given on top of diuretics. Rather than an alternative therapy, LTA should be integrated with the other treatment options already available for patients with difficult-to-treat ascites. The predictive factors of response identified in the present study can help physicians to individualise LTA and optimise the decision-making process.

Project description:IntroductionReal-world safety studies can provide important evidence on the thromboembolic risk associated with COVID-19 vaccines, considering that millions of people have been already vaccinated against COVID-19. In this study, we aimed to estimate the incidence of thromboembolic events after COVID-19 vaccination and to compare the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine with other COVID-19 vaccines.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective real-world safety study using data from two different data sources: the Italian Pharmacovigilance database (Rete Nazionale di Farmacovigilanza, RNF) and the Campania Region Health system (Sistema INFOrmativo saNità CampanIA, SINFONIA). From the start date of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign (27 December 2021) to 27 September 2022, information on COVID-19 vaccinations and thromboembolic events were extracted from the two databases. The reporting rate (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (95%CI) of thromboembolic events for 10,000 doses was calculated for each COVID-19 vaccine. Moreover, the odds of being vaccinated with the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine vs. the other COVID-19 vaccines in cases with thromboembolic events vs. controls without thromboembolic events were computed.ResultsA total of 12,692,852 vaccine doses were administered in the Campania Region, of which 6,509,475 (51.28%) were in females and mostly related to the Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine (65.05%), followed by Moderna (24.31%), Oxford-AstraZeneca (9.71%), Janssen (0.91%), and Novavax (0.02%) vaccines. A total of 641 ICSRs with COVID-19 vaccines and vascular events were retrieved from the RNF for the Campania Region, of which 453 (70.67%) were in females. Most ICSRs reported the Pfizer-BioNtech vaccine (65.05%), followed by Oxford-AstraZeneca (9.71%), Moderna (24.31%), and Janssen (0.91%). A total of 2451 events were reported in the ICSRs (3.8 events for ICSRs), of which 292 were thromboembolic events. The higher RRs of thromboembolic events were found with the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine (RR: 4.62, 95%CI: 3.50-5.99) and Janssen vaccine (RR: 3.45, 95%CI: 0.94-8.82). Thromboembolic events were associated with a higher likelihood of exposure to the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine compared to Pfizer-BioNtech (OR: 6.06; 95%CI: 4.22-8.68) and Moderna vaccines (OR: 6.46; 95%CI: 4.00-10.80).ConclusionWe observed a higher reporting of thromboembolic events with viral-vector-based vaccines (Oxford-AstraZeneca and Janssen) and an increased likelihood of being exposed to the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine compared to the mRNA vaccines (Pfizer-BioNtech and Moderna) among thromboembolic cases.

Dataset Information

Prevalence of Drug Prescriptions and Potential Safety in Patients with Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Real-World Study.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Prevalence of Drug Prescriptions and Potential Safety in Patients with Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Real-World Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets