Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Gaze behavior and cognitive states during fingerprint target group localization.


ABSTRACT:

Background

The comparison of fingerprints by expert latent print examiners generally involves repeating a process in which the examiner selects a small area of distinctive features in one print (a target group), and searches for it in the other print. In order to isolate this key element of fingerprint comparison, we use eye-tracking data to describe the behavior of latent fingerprint examiners on a narrowly defined "find the target" task. Participants were shown a fingerprint image with a target group indicated and asked to find the corresponding area of ridge detail in a second impression of the same finger and state when they found the target location. Target groups were presented on latent and plain exemplar fingerprint images, and as small areas cropped from the plain exemplars, to assess how image quality and the lack of surrounding visual context affected task performance and eye behavior. One hundred and seventeen participants completed a total of 675 trials.

Results

The presence or absence of context notably affected the areas viewed and time spent in comparison; differences between latent and plain exemplar tasks were much less significant. In virtually all trials, examiners repeatedly looked back and forth between the images, suggesting constraints on the capacity of visual working memory. On most trials where context was provided, examiners looked immediately at the corresponding location: with context, median time to find the corresponding location was less than 0.3 s (second fixation); however, without context, median time was 1.9 s (five fixations). A few trials resulted in errors in which the examiner did not find the correct target location. Basic gaze measures of overt behaviors, such as speed, areas visited, and back-and-forth behavior, were used in conjunction with the known target area to infer the underlying cognitive state of the examiner.

Conclusions

Visual context has a significant effect on the eye behavior of latent print examiners. Localization errors suggest how errors may occur in real comparisons: examiners sometimes compare an incorrect but similar target group and do not continue to search for a better candidate target group. The analytic methods and predictive models developed here can be used to describe the more complex behavior involved in actual fingerprint comparisons.

SUBMITTER: Hicklin RA 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6450991 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6562365 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11341758 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5308877 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4169884 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7323886 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7739626 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8581032 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6424104 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8511021 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7642209 | biostudies-literature