Dataset Information

Late life socioeconomic status and hypertension in an aging cohort: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:To investigate the association between individual and area-level socioeconomic status and hypertension risk among individuals later in life. METHODS:We used Cox proportional hazards models to examine the association of socioeconomic status with incident hypertension using race-specific neighborhood socioeconomic status, median household income, and education among 3372 participants (mean age, 61 years) from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study at Visit 4 (1996-1998). Incident hypertension was defined as self-reported diagnosis or reported use of antihypertensive medications. RESULTS:Over a median follow-up time of 9.4 years, there were 1874 new cases of hypertension (62.1 per 1000 person-years). Overall, being in high as compared with low socioeconomic status categories was associated with a lower risk of developing hypertension in late life, with hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 0.87 (0.77-0.98) for high neighborhood socioeconomic status tertile, 0.79 (0.69-0.90) for high individual income, and 0.75 (0.63-0.89) for college education after adjustment for traditional risk factors. These findings were consistent and robust whenever accounting for competing risks of all-cause mortality. No significant interactions by race and age (dichotomized at age 65) were observed. CONCLUSION:Among participants free of hypertension in midlife, high neighborhood and individual socioeconomic status are associated with a decreased risk of incident hypertension. Our findings support population-level interventions, such as blood pressure screening at senior centers and faith-based organizations, that are tailored to shift the distribution of blood pressure and reduce hypertension health inequalities among older adults.

SUBMITTER: McDoom MM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6453664 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Late life socioeconomic status and hypertension in an aging cohort: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

McDoom M Maya MM Palta Priya P Vart Priya P Juraschek Stephen P SP Kucharska-Newton Anna A Diez Roux Ana V AV Coresh Josef J

Journal of hypertension 20180601 6

<h4>Objective</h4>To investigate the association between individual and area-level socioeconomic status and hypertension risk among individuals later in life.<h4>Methods</h4>We used Cox proportional hazards models to examine the association of socioeconomic status with incident hypertension using race-specific neighborhood socioeconomic status, median household income, and education among 3372 participants (mean age, 61 years) from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study at Visit 4 (1996-1 ...[more]

PMID: 29621068

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Insulin resistance may contribute to aortic stiffening that leads to end-organ damage. We examined the cross-sectional association and prospective association of insulin resistance and aortic stiffness in older adults without diabetes. METHODS:We analyzed 2571 men and women at Visit 5 (in 2011-2013), and 2350 men and women at repeat examinations from baseline at Visit 1 (in 1987-1989) to Visit 5 (in 2011-2013). Linear regression was used to estimate the difference in aortic stiffness per standard unit of HOMA-IR, TG/HDL-C, and TyG at Visit 5. Linear mixed effects were used to assess if high, as opposed to non-high, aortic stiffness (>?75th percentile) was preceded by a faster annual rate of change in log-HOMA-IR, log-TG/HDL-C, and log-TyG from Visit 1 to Visit 5. RESULTS:The mean age of participants was 75 years, 37% (n?=?957) were men, and 17% (n?=?433) were African American. At Visit 5, higher HOMA-IR, higher TG/HDL-C, and higher TyG were associated with higher aortic stiffness (16 cm/s per SD (95% CI 6, 27), 29 cm/s per SD (95% CI 18, 40), and 32 cm/s per SD (95% CI 22, 42), respectively). From Visit 1 to Visit 5, high aortic stiffness, compared to non-high aortic stiffness, was not preceded by a faster annual rate of change in log-HOMA-IR from baseline to 9 years (0.030 (95% CI 0.024, 0.035) vs. 0.025 (95% CI 0.021, 0.028); p?=?0.15) or 9 years onward (0.011 (95% CI 0.007, 0.015) vs. 0.011 (95% CI 0.009, 0.013); p?=?0.31); in log-TG/HDL-C from baseline to 9 years (0.019 (95% CI 0.015, 0.024) vs. 0.024 (95% CI 0.022, 0.026); p?=?0.06) or 9 years onward (- 0.007 (95% CI - 0.010, - 0.005) vs. - 0.009 (95% CI - 0.010, - 0.007); p?=?0.08); or in log-TyG from baseline to 9 years (0.002 (95% CI 0.002, 0.003) vs. 0.003 (95% CI 0.003, 0.003); p?=?0.03) or 9 years onward (0 (95% CI 0, 0) vs. 0 (95% CI 0, 0); p?=?0.08). CONCLUSIONS:Among older adults without diabetes, insulin resistance was associated with aortic stiffness, but the putative role of insulin resistance in aortic stiffness over the life course requires further study.

Project description:Background: Physiological function impairment is the main precursor of assisted living, movement disorder, and disability in the elderly. The relationship between a combination of healthy lifestyle factors and functional limitations is unclear. We investigated the association between healthy lifestyle scores and the risk of functional impairment in community residents. Methods: A total of 10,602 participants (aged 40-64 years) of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study with no history of cardiovascular events and tumors and who came for their fourth visit (1997-1999) were included in the final analysis. Primary outcomes were recorded during the fourth visit; these included impaired lower extremity function, activities of daily living, and instrumental activities of daily living. A logistic regression model was used to test the associations between healthy lifestyle scores and functional impairment. The lifestyle score comprised six factors: healthy diet, moderate alcohol consumption, coffee consumption, physical activity, normal body weight, and no smoking. Results: Among the 10,602 participants with a median follow-up of 9 years, the prevalence rates of impaired lower extremity function, activities of daily living, and instrumental activities of daily living were 50.6%, 14.7%, and 21.6%, respectively. In the adjusted Cox regression model, participants with a healthy lifestyle score of 5 plus 6 had a significant lower risk of impaired lower extremity function (odds ratio = 0.252, 95% confidence interval: 0.184-0.344, P < 0.001), activities of daily living (odds ratio = 0.201, 95% confidence interval: 0.106-0.380, P < 0.001), and instrumental activities of daily living (odds ratio = 0.274, 95% confidence interval: 0.168-0.449, P < 0.001) than did participants with a score of 0. The association of healthy lifestyle scores with impaired activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living was stronger for individuals without diabetes than for those with it (P for interaction < 0.05). This can be partly explained by the fact that the lowest risk of functional impairment among the participants with diabetes was associated with being overweight. Conclusion: Adherence to an overall healthy lifestyle was associated with a lower risk of physiological function limitation. This study highlights the importance of behavioral interventions in the prevention of disabilities. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00005131.

Dataset Information

Late life socioeconomic status and hypertension in an aging cohort: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

Publications

Late life socioeconomic status and hypertension in an aging cohort: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure