Dataset Information

The association of county-level socioeconomic factors with individual tobacco and alcohol use: a longitudinal study of U.S. adults.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Place-based factors have been implicated as root causes of socioeconomic disparities in risky health behaviors such as tobacco and alcohol use. Yet few studies examine the effects of county-level socioeconomic characteristics, despite the fact that social and public health policies are often implemented at the county level. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that county-level socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with individual tobacco and alcohol use.

Methods

The sample included a panel of participants from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (N?=?9302). The primary predictors were three time-varying measures of socioeconomic disadvantage in an individual's county of residence: educational attainment, percent unemployment, and per capita income. We first conducted traditional ordinary least squares (OLS) models, both unadjusted and adjusted for individual-level covariates. We then conducted fixed effects (FE) models to adjust for confounding by unmeasured time-invariant individual-level factors.

Results

OLS and FE models yielded contrasting results: higher county-level per capita income was associated with decreased drinking in OLS models and increased drinking in FE models, while decreased county-level educational attainment was associated with decreased smoking in OLS models and more cigarettes per day in FE models. The findings from FE models suggest that OLS models were confounded by unobserved time-invariant characteristics. Notably, the point estimates for the county-level measures were small, and in many cases they may not represent a clinically meaningful effect except at the population level.

Conclusions

These results suggest that county-level socioeconomic characteristics may modestly influence tobacco and alcohol use. Future work should examine the effects of specific county policies that might explain these findings.

SUBMITTER: Hamad R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6458796 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The association of county-level socioeconomic factors with individual tobacco and alcohol use: a longitudinal study of U.S. adults.

Hamad Rita R Brown Daniel M DM Basu Sanjay S

BMC public health 20190411 1

<h4>Background</h4>Place-based factors have been implicated as root causes of socioeconomic disparities in risky health behaviors such as tobacco and alcohol use. Yet few studies examine the effects of county-level socioeconomic characteristics, despite the fact that social and public health policies are often implemented at the county level. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that county-level socioeconomic disadvantage was associated with individual tobacco and alcohol use.<h4>Methods</h4 ...[more]

PMID: 30971249

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe link between e-cigarette use and subsequent development of respiratory diseases remains an open question.Aims and methodsA subset of a probability sample of U.S. adults from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study Waves 1 and 2 were selected for biospecimen analysis (n = 4614). Subjects were divided into three mutually exclusive groups at baseline: nonusers (n = 2849), exclusive e-cigarette users (n = 222), and poly e-cigarette/tobacco users (n = 1,543). Geometric mean concentrations of baseline biomarkers from five classes of harmful and potentially harmful constituents were reported. Multivariable linear regressions were conducted to examine the relationship between baseline biomarkers and subsequent respiratory symptoms among user groups.ResultsBaseline exclusive e-cigarette users (33.6%[confidence interval, CI: 26.7% to 41.4%]) and poly e-cigarette/tobacco users (50.8%[CI: 47.4% to 54.2%]) had higher prevalence of subsequent respiratory symptoms than nonusers (21.7%[19.2% to 24.4%]). As compared with nonusers, poly e-cigarette/tobacco users had higher concentrations in clinically relevant biomarkers at baseline than exclusive e-cigarette users. Among poly e-cigarette/tobacco users, baseline nicotine metabolites (TNE2, cotinine), tobacco-specific nitrosamine (NNAL), PAH (1-NAP, 3-FLU), and volatile organic compound (N-Acetyl-S-(2-carboxyethyl)-l-cysteine, N-acetyl-S-(2-cyanoethyl)-l-cysteine) were significantly higher among those reporting subsequent respiratory symptoms than those who did not. Among exclusive e-cigarette users, baseline NNAL was significantly higher among those reporting subsequent respiratory symptoms than those who did not. Within subjects with subsequent respiratory symptoms, NNAL was 2.5 times higher in exclusive e-cigarette users (10.7[6.5 to 17.5]) and 63.4 times higher in poly e-cigarette/tobacco users (199.6[176.7 to 225.4]) than nonusers (3.1[2.4 to 3.9]).ConclusionsE-cigarette use is associated with higher concentrations of known tobacco-related toxicants and risks of subsequent respiratory symptoms than nonusers. Poly e-cigarette/tobacco users exhibit higher risk than exclusive e-cigarette users.ImplicationsThis longitudinal study identified positive associations between baseline urinary biomarkers of exposure to tobacco-related toxicants and increased risks of subsequent respiratory symptoms across varying e-cigarette use groups. E-cigarette use is associated with increased exposure to known tobacco-related toxicants, and certain toxicant exposure increases the risk of respiratory symptoms.

Project description:The spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) across the United States confirms that not all Americans are equally at risk of infection, severe disease, or mortality. A range of intersecting biological, demographic, and socioeconomic factors are likely to determine an individual's susceptibility to COVID-19. These factors vary significantly across counties in the United States, and often reflect the structural inequities in our society. Recognizing this vast inter-county variation in risks will be critical to mounting an adequate response strategy. Using publicly available county-specific data we identified key biological, demographic, and socioeconomic factors influencing susceptibility to COVID-19, guided by international experiences and consideration of epidemiological parameters of importance. We created bivariate county-level maps to summarize examples of key relationships across these categories, grouping age and poverty; comorbidities and lack of health insurance; proximity, density and bed capacity; and race and ethnicity, and premature death. We have also made available an interactive online tool that allows public health officials to query risk factors most relevant to their local context. Our data demonstrate significant inter-county variation in key epidemiological risk factors, with a clustering of counties in certain states, which will result in an increased demand on their public health system. While the East and West coast cities are particularly vulnerable owing to their densities (and travel routes), a large number of counties in the Southeastern states have a high proportion of at-risk populations, with high levels of poverty, comorbidities, and premature death at baseline, and low levels of health insurance coverage. The list of variables we have examined is by no means comprehensive, and several of them are interrelated and magnify underlying vulnerabilities. The online tool allows readers to explore additional combinations of risk factors, set categorical thresholds for each covariate, and filter counties above different population thresholds. COVID-19 responses and decision making in the United States remain decentralized. Both the federal and state governments will benefit from recognizing high intra-state, inter-county variation in population risks and response capacity. Many of the factors that are likely to exacerbate the burden of COVID-19 and the demand on healthcare systems are the compounded result of long-standing structural inequalities in US society. Strategies to protect those in the most vulnerable counties will require urgent measures to better support communities' attempts at social distancing and to accelerate cooperation across jurisdictions to supply personnel and equipment to counties that will experience high demand.

Dataset Information

The association of county-level socioeconomic factors with individual tobacco and alcohol use: a longitudinal study of U.S. adults.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

The association of county-level socioeconomic factors with individual tobacco and alcohol use: a longitudinal study of U.S. adults.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets