Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Introduction
We examined reasons for low mild cognitive impairment (MCI)-to-cognitively normal (CN) reversion rates in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI).Methods
CN and MCI participants were identified as remaining stable, progressing, or reverting at 1-year of follow-up (Year 1). Application of ADNI's MCI criteria at Year 1 in addition to Alzheimer's disease biomarkers by group were examined.Results
The MCI-to-CN reversion rate was 3.0%. When specific components were examined, 22.5% of stable MCI participants had normal memory performance at Year 1 and their Alzheimer's disease biomarkers were consistent with the stable CN group. At Year 1, when all MCI criteria were not met, the more subjective Clinical Dementia Rating rather than objective memory measure appeared to drive continuation of the MCI diagnosis.Discussion
Results demonstrate an artificially low 1-year MCI-to-CN reversion rate in ADNI-diagnosed participants. If the Logical Memory cutoffs had been consistently applied, the reversion rate would have been at least 21.8%.
SUBMITTER: Thomas KR
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6461519 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Apr
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Thomas Kelsey R KR Eppig Joel S JS Weigand Alexandra J AJ Edmonds Emily C EC Wong Christina G CG Jak Amy J AJ Delano-Wood Lisa L Galasko Douglas R DR Salmon David P DP Edland Steven D SD Bondi Mark W MW
Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association 20190111 4
<h4>Introduction</h4>We examined reasons for low mild cognitive impairment (MCI)-to-cognitively normal (CN) reversion rates in the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI).<h4>Methods</h4>CN and MCI participants were identified as remaining stable, progressing, or reverting at 1-year of follow-up (Year 1). Application of ADNI's MCI criteria at Year 1 in addition to Alzheimer's disease biomarkers by group were examined.<h4>Results</h4>The MCI-to-CN reversion rate was 3.0%. When specific ...[more]