Dataset Information

A systematic review of robotic versus open and video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approaches for thymectomy.

ABSTRACT: Background:Median sternotomy has been the most commonly used approach for thymectomy to date. Recent advances in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robotic access with CO2 insufflation techniques have allowed more minimally invasive approaches. However, prior reviews have not compared robotic to both open and VATS thymectomy. Methods:A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases. Original research articles comparing robotic to VATS or to open thymectomy for myasthenia gravis, anterior mediastinal masses, or thymomas were included. Meta-analyses were performed for mortality, operative time, blood loss, transfusions, length of stay, conversion to open, intraoperative and postoperative complication rates, and positive/negative margin rates. Results:Robotic thymectomy is a valid alternative to the open approach; advantages include: reduced blood loss [weighted mean difference (WMD): -173.03, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): -305.90, -40.17, P=0.01], fewer postoperative complications (odds ratio: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.60, P<0.00001), a shorter hospital stay (WMD: -2.78, 95% CI: -3.22, -2.33, P<0.00001), and a lower positive margin rate (relative difference: -0.04, 95% CI: -0.07, -0.01, P=0.01), with comparable operative times (WMD: 6.73, 95% CI: -21.20, 34.66, P=0.64). Robotic thymectomy was comparable with the VATS approach; both have the advantage of avoiding median sternotomy. Conclusions:While randomized controlled studies are required to make definitive conclusions, current data suggests that robotic thymectomy is superior to open surgery and comparable to a VATS approach. Long-term follow-up is required to further delineate oncological outcomes.

SUBMITTER: O'Sullivan KE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6462547 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A systematic review of robotic versus open and video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approaches for thymectomy.

O'Sullivan Katie E KE Kreaden Usha S US Hebert April E AE Eaton Donna D Redmond Karen C KC

Annals of cardiothoracic surgery 20190301 2

<h4>Background</h4>Median sternotomy has been the most commonly used approach for thymectomy to date. Recent advances in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and robotic access with CO<sub>2</sub> insufflation techniques have allowed more minimally invasive approaches. However, prior reviews have not compared robotic to both open and VATS thymectomy.<h4>Methods</h4>A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases. Origina ...[more]

PMID: 31032201

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundLung cancer is highly prevalent in Chinese population. The association of operative approach with economic burden in these patients remains unknown.ObjectivesThis institution-level cohort study aimed to compare the cost-related clinical outcomes and health care costs among patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and open lobectomy, and to investigate the factors associated with the costs.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent VATS or open lobectomy in a provincial referral cancer center in China in 2018. Propensity score matching (PSM) method was applied to balance the baseline characteristics in VATS lobectomy and open lobectomy group. Clinical effectiveness measures included post-operative blood transfusion, lung infection, and length of stay (LOS). Hospitalization costs were extracted from hospital information system to assess economic burden. Multivariable generalized linear model (GLM) with gamma probability distribution and log-link was used to analyze the factors associated with total costs.ResultsAfter PSM, 376 patients were selected in the analytic sample. Compared to open lobectomy group, the VATS lobectomy group had a lower blood transfusion rate (2.13% vs. 3.19%, P = 0.75), lower lung infection rate (21.28% vs. 39.89%, P < 0.001) and shorter post-operative LOS (9.4 ± 3.22 days vs. 10.86 ± 4.69 days, P < 0.001). Total hospitalization costs of VATS lobectomy group and open lobectomy were similar: Renminbi (RMB) 84398.03 ± 13616.13, RMB 81,964.92 ± 16748.11, respectively (P = 0.12). Total non-surgery costs were significantly lower in the VATS lobectomy group than in the open lobectomy group: RMB 41948.40 ± 7747.54 vs. RMB 45752.36 ± 10346.42 (P < 0.001). VATS approach, lung infection, longer post-operative length of stay, health insurance coverage, and lung cancer diagnosis were associated with higher total hospitalization costs (P < 0.05).ConclusionsVATS lobectomy has a lower lung infection rate, and shorter post-operative LOS than open lobectomy. Future studies are needed to investigate other aspects of clinical effectiveness and the economic burden from a societal perspective.

Project description:BackgroundApproaches of thoracoscopic thymectomy for myasthenia gravis (MG) are debatable. The subxiphoid approach is widely utilized recent years for its better visualization of the anterior mediastinum. In the present study, we compared perioperative outcomes and mid-term effects of the extended thymectomy for MG between the subxiphoid approach and the routine right-thoracic approach.MethodsOne hundred and thirty-one MG patients treated with thoracoscopic extended thymectomy were analyzed. Among them, 68 patients were operated on via the subxiphoid approach and the other 63 via the conventional right-side unilateral approach. The patient outcomes were retrospectively reviewed and evaluated. Mid-term clinical outcome was assessed according to the classification system proposed by the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA). Clinical efficacy and variables influencing outcome were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.ResultsCompared with the right thoracic approach, the duration of the procedure via the subxiphoid approach was significantly shorter (P=0.035), the rates of total thymectomy were higher (P=0.028), and the pain scores on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7 were significantly lower (P<0.001, P<0.001, and P=0.03, respectively). A total of 112 patients with MG were followed up. The subxiphoid approach group reported higher rates of complete stable remission (CSR) and effective treatment of MG, although these differences were not statistically significant (Z=-0.484, P=0.627). By multivariate Cox proportional hazards modes analysis, the chance of CSR was significantly increased when age <40 (OR: 2.623, 95% CI: 1.150-5.983, P=0.022), non-thymomatous MG (OR: 1.078, 95% CI: 1.101-3.316, P=0.021) and MGFA clinical classification (OR: 2.024, 95%:1.164-3.523, P=0.013).ConclusionsThe subxiphoid approach has shorter operation time, higher rates of total thymectomy and better quality of life compared with the lateral thoracoscopic approach. Preoperative age, pathological diagnoses and MGFA Clinical Classification are the independent risk factors for non-complete stable remission (NCSR) after thymectomy.

Dataset Information

A systematic review of robotic versus open and video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approaches for thymectomy.

Publications

A systematic review of robotic versus open and video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approaches for thymectomy.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets