Dataset Information

Implementation of an electronic medical record tool for early detection of deep vein thrombosis in the ambulatory oncology setting.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and hospitalization in cancer patients.

Objectives

To evaluate the feasibility of an electronic alert to identify and screen at-risk individuals and gather rates of early detection of deep vein thrombosis (DVT).

Patients/methods

An alert was built into the electronic medical record based on a validated risk tool (Khorana Score [KS]) and outcomes evaluated in an initial silent phase. The alert functioned in real time to warn physicians of high-risk patients (KS ? 3) and suggested lower extremity screening ultrasonography in a subsequent active phase.

Results

Of 194 consecutive patients identified as high risk in the silent phase, 14 (7.2%) developed subsequent DVT or pulmonary embolism (PE) over 90-day follow-up, with a median of 27 days. Mean 90-day emergency room (ER) visits, all-cause admissions, and length of stay (days) for patients with DVT were 1.2, 1.6, and 9.1 compared to 0.89, 0.93, and 5.1 for all patients, respectively. In the active phase, 197 consecutive alerts met inclusion criteria, and 40 patients (20.3%) received a screening ultrasound. Five (12.5%) had a DVT and were started on therapeutic anticoagulation. Of patients with alerts who had screening deferred, 13 (8.3%) were later diagnosed with DVT (median 50.5 days) and 7 (4.5%) with PE.

Conclusion

An automated alert may have value in early detection of DVT in high-risk cancer patients leading to earlier intervention, and could potentially prevent VTE-related morbidity.

SUBMITTER: Kunapareddy G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6462749 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Implementation of an electronic medical record tool for early detection of deep vein thrombosis in the ambulatory oncology setting.

Kunapareddy Girish G Switzer Benjamin B Jain Prantesh P Conces Madison M Chen Yu-Wei YW Patel Bhumika B Patel Sagar S Pinnamaneni Pramod P Pohlman Brad B Angelini Dana E DE McCrae Keith R KR Khorana Alok A AA

Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis 20190128 2

<h4>Background</h4>Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of morbidity, mortality, and hospitalization in cancer patients.<h4>Objectives</h4>To evaluate the feasibility of an electronic alert to identify and screen at-risk individuals and gather rates of early detection of deep vein thrombosis (DVT).<h4>Patients/methods</h4>An alert was built into the electronic medical record based on a validated risk tool (Khorana Score [KS]) and outcomes evaluated in an initial silent phase. The alert ...[more]

PMID: 31011706

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDocumentation in the medical record facilitates the diagnosis and treatment of patients. Few studies have assessed the quality of outpatient medical record documentation, and to the authors' knowledge, none has conclusively determined the correlates of chart documentation. We therefore undertook the present study to measure the rates of documentation of quality of care measures in an outpatient primary care practice setting that utilizes an electronic medical record.MethodsWe reviewed electronic medical records from 834 patients receiving care from 167 physicians (117 internists and 50 pediatricians) at 14 sites of a multi-specialty medical group in Massachusetts. We abstracted information for five measures of medical record documentation quality: smoking history, medications, drug allergies, compliance with screening guidelines, and immunizations. From other sources we determined physicians' specialty, gender, year of medical school graduation, and self-reported time spent teaching and in patient care.ResultsAmong internists, unadjusted rates of documentation were 96.2% for immunizations, 91.6% for medications, 88% for compliance with screening guidelines, 61.6% for drug allergies, 37.8% for smoking history. Among pediatricians, rates were 100% for immunizations, 84.8% for medications, 90.8% for compliance with screening guidelines, 50.4% for drug allergies, and 20.4% for smoking history. While certain physician and patient characteristics correlated with some measures of documentation quality, documentation varied depending on the measure. For example, female internists were more likely than male internists to document smoking history (odds ratio [OR], 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.27 - 2.83) but were less likely to document drug allergies (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.35 - 0.75).ConclusionsMedical record documentation varied depending on the measure, with room for improvement in most domains. A variety of characteristics correlated with medical record documentation, but no pattern emerged. Further study could lead to targeted interventions to improve documentation.

Project description:BackgroundSubstantial research has been performed about the impact of computerized physician order entry on medication safety in the inpatient setting; however, relatively little has been done in ambulatory care, where most medications are prescribed.ObjectiveTo outline the development and piloting process of the Ambulatory Electronic Health Record (EHR) Evaluation Tool and to report the quantitative and qualitative results from the pilot.MethodsThe Ambulatory EHR Evaluation Tool closely mirrors the inpatient version of the tool, which is administered by The Leapfrog Group. The tool was piloted with seven clinics in the United States, each using a different EHR. The tool consists of a medication safety test and a medication reconciliation module. For the medication test, clinics entered test patients and associated test orders into their EHR and recorded any decision support they received. An overall percentage score of unsafe orders detected, and order category scores were provided to clinics. For the medication reconciliation module, clinics demonstrated how their EHR electronically detected discrepancies between two medication lists.ResultsFor the medication safety test, the clinics correctly alerted on 54.6% of unsafe medication orders. Clinics scored highest in the drug allergy (100%) and drug-drug interaction (89.3%) categories. Lower scoring categories included drug age (39.3%) and therapeutic duplication (39.3%). None of the clinics alerted for the drug laboratory or drug monitoring orders. In the medication reconciliation module, three (42.8%) clinics had an EHR-based medication reconciliation function; however, only one of those clinics could demonstrate it during the pilot.ConclusionClinics struggled in areas of advanced decision support such as drug age, drug laboratory, and drub monitoring. Most clinics did not have an EHR-based medication reconciliation function and this process was dependent on accessing patients' medication lists. Wider use of this tool could improve outpatient medication safety and can inform vendors about areas of improvement.

Project description:BackgroundReports on the impact of electronic medical record (EMR) systems on clinicians are mixed. Currently, nurses' experiences of adopting a large-scale, multisite EMR system have not been investigated. Nurses are the largest health care workforce; therefore, the impact of EMR implementation must be investigated and understood to ensure that patient care quality, changes to nurses' work, and nurses themselves are not negatively impacted.ObjectiveThis study aims to explore Australian nurses' postimplementation experiences of an organization-wide EMR system.MethodsThis qualitative descriptive study used focus group and individual interviews and an open-ended survey question to collect data between 12 and 18 months after the implementation of an EMR across 6 hospital sites of a large health care organization in Victoria, Australia. Data were collected between November 2020 and June 2021, coinciding with the COVID-19 pandemic. Analysis comprised complementary inductive and deductive approaches. Specifically, reflexive thematic analysis was followed by framework analysis by the coding of data as barriers or facilitators to nurses' use of the EMR using the Theoretical Domains Framework.ResultsA total of 158 nurses participated in this study. The EMR implementation dramatically changed nurses' work and how they viewed their profession, and nurses were still adapting to the EMR implementation 18 months after implementation. Reflexive thematic analysis led to the development of 2 themes: An unintentional divide captured nurses' feelings of division related to how using the EMR affected nurses, patient care, and the broader nursing profession. This time, it's personal detailed nurses' beliefs about the EMR implementation leading to bigger changes to nurses as individuals and nursing as a profession than other changes that nurses have experienced within the health care organization. The most frequent barriers to EMR use by nurses were related to the Theoretical Domains Framework domain of environmental context and resources. Facilitators of EMR use were most often related to memory, attention, and decision processes. Most barriers and facilitators were related to motivation.ConclusionsNurses perceived EMR implementation to have a mixed impact on the provision of quality patient care and on their colleagues. Implementing technology in a health care setting was perceived as a complex endeavor that impacted nurses' perceptions of their autonomy, ways of working, and professional roles. Potential negative consequences were related to nursing workforce retention and patient care delivery. Motivation was the main behavioral driver for nurses' adoption of EMR systems and hence a key consideration for implementing interventions or organizational changes directed at nurses.

Dataset Information

Implementation of an electronic medical record tool for early detection of deep vein thrombosis in the ambulatory oncology setting.

Background

Objectives

Patients/methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Implementation of an electronic medical record tool for early detection of deep vein thrombosis in the ambulatory oncology setting.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets