Dataset Information

Diagnostic Reasoning Assessment Toolkit: Guided Reflection and Standardized Cases for At-Risk Final-Year Medical Students.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

A failing diagnostic reasoning performance may represent student deficiency in a number of potential areas. However, many standard clinical skills assessments do not offer detailed assessments of diagnostic reasoning ability. This toolkit was designed to identify specific learner deficiencies with respect to diagnostic reasoning by focusing on individual student remedial work and by standardizing faculty evaluation.

Methods

Educational objectives were derived from institutional patient care competency learning objectives at the Indiana University School of Medicine. Review of existing clinical skills remediation literature yielded a design that combined two learning methods: guided reflection and standardized patient cases.

Results

Over the 2014-2015 academic year, 12 final-year medical students used this resource to help develop an individual remedial learning plan prior to retaking a failed standardized assessment. Students were generally satisfied with the combined guided reflection and standardized case learning methods.

Discussion

Unique final-year medical student scheduling pressures, combined with a reporting time line for both institutional high-stakes OSCE remediation exams and the USMLE Step 2 Clinical Skills exam, incentivized failing students to schedule a retest on a short time line, often leaving little time for critical preparation. This resource offered an opportunity to efficiently spend limited preparation time to individualize exam preparation using a variety of faculty facilitators. The simplistic design was readily deployable to multiple faculty remediation mentors. Our institution can now provide a standardized diagnostic reasoning remedial evaluation using numerous clinical faculty based at any of our nine campuses.

SUBMITTER: Pitre C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6464405 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Diagnostic Reasoning Assessment Toolkit: Guided Reflection and Standardized Cases for At-Risk Final-Year Medical Students.

Pitre Cory C

MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources 20160721

<h4>Introduction</h4>A failing diagnostic reasoning performance may represent student deficiency in a number of potential areas. However, many standard clinical skills assessments do not offer detailed assessments of diagnostic reasoning ability. This toolkit was designed to identify specific learner deficiencies with respect to diagnostic reasoning by focusing on individual student remedial work and by standardizing faculty evaluation.<h4>Methods</h4>Educational objectives were derived from ins ...[more]

PMID: 31008208

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeGraduating medical students need broad clinical diagnostic reasoning skills that integrate learning across clinical specialties to deal with undifferentiated patient problems. The opportunity to acquire these skills may be limited during clinical placements on increasingly specialized hospital wards. We developed an intervention of regular general practitioner (GP) facilitated teaching in hospital placements to enable students to develop broad clinical diagnostic reasoning. The intervention was piloted, refined and delivered to a whole cohort of medical students at the start of their third year. This paper examines whether students perceived opportunities to improve their broad diagnostic clinical reasoning through our intervention.MethodsGP-facilitated teaching sessions were delivered weekly in hospital placements to small groups of 6–8 students for 90 mins over 6 weeks. Students practiced clinical reasoning with real patient cases that they encountered on their placements. Evaluation of learning outcomes was conducted through a student questionnaire using Likert scales with free-text boxes for additional explanation. Focus groups were conducted to gain a more in-depth understanding of student perspectives.ResultsAs high as 87% of students agreed that their broad clinical diagnostic reasoning ability had improved. Thematic analysis of the qualitative data revealed four factors supporting this improvement: practicing the hypothetico-deductive method, using real patient cases, composing student groups from different speciality placements and the breadth of the facilitators’ knowledge. Students additionally reported enhanced person-centredness in terms of understanding the patient’s perspective and journey. Students perceived that the added value of general practitioner facilitators lay in their broad knowledge base and knowledge of patient needs in the community.ConclusionOur results suggest that medical students can develop broad clinical diagnostic reasoning skills in hospital settings through regular GP-facilitated teaching. Our approach has the advantage of working within the established curricular format of hospital placements and being deliverable at scale to whole student cohorts.

Project description:Clinical reasoning for acute dyspnoea: Comparison of final-year medical students from discipline- and competency-based undergraduate programmes. BACKGROUND:The global shift to competency-based medical education aims to improve the performance of its trainees, including in the key competency domain of clinical reasoning. However, research on whether such education actually improves clinical reasoning is sparse. The purpose of this study is to compare assessed clinical reasoning performance in digitally presented cases of acute dyspnoea between final-year medical students from a traditional, discipline-based and those from an integrated, competency-based undergraduate programme. METHODS:A total of 60 medical students in their final-year clerkships participated in the study; 30 were from a discipline-based programme, and 30 were from a competency-based programme of the same faculty. The students completed a knowledge test consisting of 22 single choice items and a computer-based test of clinical reasoning with six video-based case scenarios with different underlying diseases leading to dyspnoea. The operationalized measures of clinical reasoning were the number and relevance of the diagnostic tests chosen, time to diagnosis and diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS:The two groups did not differ in their knowledge of the acute dyspnoea content domain. With regard to clinical reasoning, the selection of relevant tests, time required to make a diagnosis and accuracy of the diagnosis varied across the six case scenarios in both groups. However, the results from the measures of the clinical reasoning process did not differ between the students from the two types of undergraduate medical programmes. No significant differences were found with regard to the selection of relevant diagnostic tests (M?=?63.8% vs. M?=?62.8%), the time to a diagnosis (M?= 128.7?s vs. M?= 136.4?s) or the accuracy of diagnosis (M?=?82.2% vs. M?=?77.0%). CONCLUSIONS:Key indicators of the clinical reasoning process, when assessed with objectively measured parameters, did not differ between final-year medical students from a traditional, discipline-based and those from an integrated, competency-based undergraduate programme in the domain of acute dyspnoea. The results substantiate and expand those of previous studies based on subjective assessor ratings that showed limited change in the clinical reasoning performance of medical students with competency-based undergraduate education.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Over-testing of patients is a significant problem in clinical medicine that can be tackled by education. Clinical reasoning learning (CRL) is a potentially relevant method for teaching test ordering and interpretation. The feasibility might be improved by using an interactive whiteboard (IWB) during the CRL sessions to enhance student perceptions and behaviours around diagnostic tests. Overall, IWB/CRL could improve their skills. METHODS:Third-year undergraduate medical students enrolled in a vertically integrated curriculum were randomized into two groups before clinical placement in either a respiratory disease or respiratory physiology unit: IWB-based CRL plus clinical mentoring (IWB/CRL?+?CM: n?=?40) or clinical mentoring only (CM-only: n?=?40). Feasibility and learning outcomes were assessed. In addition, feedback via questionnaire of the IWB students and their classmates (n?=?233) was compared. RESULTS:Analyses of the IWB/CRL sessions (n?=?40, 27 paperboards) revealed that they met validated learning objectives. Students perceived IWB as useful and easy to use. After the IWB/CRL?+?CM sessions, students mentioned more hypothesis-based indications in a test ordering file (p?<? 0.001) and looked for more nonclinical signs directly on raw data tests (p?<? 0.01) compared with students in the CM-only group. Last, among students who attended pre- and post-assessments (n?=?23), the number of diagnostic tests ordered did not change in the IWB/CRL?+?CM group (+?7%; p?=?N.S), whereas it increased among CM-only students (+?30%; p?<? 0.001). Test interpretability increased significantly in the IWB/CRL?+?CM group (from 4.7 to 37.2%; p?<? 0.01) but not significantly in the CM-only group (from 2.4 to 9.8%; p?=?0.36). CONCLUSIONS:Integrating IWB into CRL sessions is feasible to teach test ordering and interpretation to undergraduate students. Moreover, student feedback and prospective assessment suggested a positive impact of IWB/CRL sessions on students' learning.

Dataset Information

Diagnostic Reasoning Assessment Toolkit: Guided Reflection and Standardized Cases for At-Risk Final-Year Medical Students.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Discussion

Publications

Diagnostic Reasoning Assessment Toolkit: Guided Reflection and Standardized Cases for At-Risk Final-Year Medical Students.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets