Procalcitonin to initiate or discontinue antibiotics in acute respiratory tract infections.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Schuetz P
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6464976 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6485408 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe effect of procalcitonin-guided use of antibiotics on treatment for suspected lower respiratory tract infection is unclear.MethodsIn 14 U.S. hospitals with high adherence to quality measures for the treatment of pneumonia, we provided guidance for clinicians about national clinical practice recommendations for the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections and the interpretation of procalcitonin assays. We then randomly assigned patients who presented to the emergency department with a suspected lower respiratory tract infection and for whom the treating physician was uncertain whether antibiotic therapy was indicated to one of two groups: the procalcitonin group, in which the treating clinicians were provided with real-time initial (and serial, if the patient was hospitalized) procalcitonin assay results and an antibiotic use guideline with graded recommendations based on four tiers of procalcitonin levels, or the usual-care group. We hypothesized that within 30 days after enrollment the total antibiotic-days would be lower - and the percentage of patients with adverse outcomes would not be more than 4.5 percentage points higher - in the procalcitonin group than in the usual-care group.ResultsA total of 1656 patients were included in the final analysis cohort (826 randomly assigned to the procalcitonin group and 830 to the usual-care group), of whom 782 (47.2%) were hospitalized and 984 (59.4%) received antibiotics within 30 days. The treating clinician received procalcitonin assay results for 792 of 826 patients (95.9%) in the procalcitonin group (median time from sample collection to assay result, 77 minutes) and for 18 of 830 patients (2.2%) in the usual-care group. In both groups, the procalcitonin-level tier was associated with the decision to prescribe antibiotics in the emergency department. There was no significant difference between the procalcitonin group and the usual-care group in antibiotic-days (mean, 4.2 and 4.3 days, respectively; difference, -0.05 day; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.6 to 0.5; P=0.87) or the proportion of patients with adverse outcomes (11.7% [96 patients] and 13.1% [109 patients]; difference, -1.5 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.6 to 1.7; P<0.001 for noninferiority) within 30 days.ConclusionsThe provision of procalcitonin assay results, along with instructions on their interpretation, to emergency department and hospital-based clinicians did not result in less use of antibiotics than did usual care among patients with suspected lower respiratory tract infection. (Funded by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences; ProACT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02130986 .).
| S-EPMC6197800 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Overuse of antibiotics in the treatment of acute respiratory tract infection (ARI) contributes to the growing problem of antibiotic-resistant infections.To identify factors that influence community practitioners to prescribe antibiotics and examine how they differ from the recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guideline for treatment of ARI.Paper case vignette study using a fractional factorial design.One hundred one community practitioners and eight faculty members.We asked community practitioners to estimate how likely they would be to prescribe antibiotics in each of 20 cases of ARI and then used multiple regression to infer the importance weights of each of nine clinical findings. We then compared practitioners' weights with those of a panel of eight faculty physicians who evaluated the cases following the CDC guidelines rather than their own judgments.Practitioners prescribed antibiotics in 44.5% of cases, over twice the percentage treated by the panel using the CDC guidelines (20%). In deciding to prescribe antibiotic treatment, practitioners gave little or no weight to patient factors such as whether the patients wanted antibiotics. Although weighting patterns differed among practitioners, the majority (72%) gave the greatest weight to duration of illness. When illness duration was short, the rate of prescribing (20.1%) was the same as the rate of the faculty panel (20%).Based on hypothetical cases of ARI, community practitioners prescribed antibiotics at twice the rate of faculty following CDC practice guidelines. Practitioners were most strongly influenced by duration of illness. The effect of duration was strongest when accompanied by fever or productive cough, suggesting that these situations would be important areas for practitioner education and further clinical studies.
| S-EPMC2533389 | biostudies-other
Project description:Background: Distinguishing between bacterial and viral lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) in hospitalized patients remains challenging. Transcriptional profiling is a promising tool for improving diagnosis in LRTI. Methods: We performed whole blood transcriptional analysis in a cohort of 118 adult patients (median [IQR] age, 61 [50-76] years) hospitalized with bacterial, viral or viral-bacterial LRTI, and 40 age-matched healthy controls (60 [46-70] years). We applied class comparisons, modular analysis and class prediction algorithms to identify distinct biosignatures for bacterial and viral LRTI, which were validated in an independent group of patients. Results: Patients were classified as bacterial (B, n=22), viral (V, n=71) and bacterial-viral LRTI (BV, n=25) based on comprehensive microbiologic testing. Compared with healthy controls statistical group comparisons (p<0.01; with multiple test corrections) identified 3,376 differentially expressed genes in patients with B-LRTI; 2,391 in V-LRTI, and 2,628 in BV-LRTI. Independent of etiologic pathogen, patients with LRTI demonstrated overexpression of innate immunity and underexpression of adaptive immunity genes. Patients with B-LRTI showed significant overexpression of inflammation (B>BV>V) and neutrophils (B>BV>V) while those with V-LRTI displayed significantly greater overexpression of interferon genes (V>BV>B). The K-Nearest Neighbors (K-NN) algorithm identified 10 classifier genes that discriminated patients with bacterial vs viral LRTI with 97% [95%CI: 84-100] sensitivity and 92% [77-98] specificity. In comparison, procalcitonin classified bacterial vs viral LRTI with 38% [18-62] sensitivity and 91% [76-98] specificity. Conclusions: Transcriptional profiling can be used as a helpful tool for the diagnosis of adults hospitalized with LRTI.
2015-09-14 | GSE60244 | GEO
Project description:Background: Distinguishing between bacterial and viral lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) in hospitalized patients remains challenging. Transcriptional profiling is a promising tool for improving diagnosis in LRTI. Methods: We performed whole blood transcriptional analysis in a cohort of 118 adult patients (median [IQR] age, 61 [50-76] years) hospitalized with bacterial, viral or viral-bacterial LRTI, and 40 age-matched healthy controls (60 [46-70] years). We applied class comparisons, modular analysis and class prediction algorithms to identify distinct biosignatures for bacterial and viral LRTI, which were validated in an independent group of patients. Results: Patients were classified as bacterial (B, n=22), viral (V, n=71) and bacterial-viral LRTI (BV, n=25) based on comprehensive microbiologic testing. Compared with healthy controls statistical group comparisons (p<0.01; with multiple test corrections) identified 3,376 differentially expressed genes in patients with B-LRTI; 2,391 in V-LRTI, and 2,628 in BV-LRTI. Independent of etiologic pathogen, patients with LRTI demonstrated overexpression of innate immunity and underexpression of adaptive immunity genes. Patients with B-LRTI showed significant overexpression of inflammation (B>BV>V) and neutrophils (B>BV>V) while those with V-LRTI displayed significantly greater overexpression of interferon genes (V>BV>B). The K-Nearest Neighbors (K-NN) algorithm identified 10 classifier genes that discriminated patients with bacterial vs viral LRTI with 97% [95%CI: 84-100] sensitivity and 92% [77-98] specificity. In comparison, procalcitonin classified bacterial vs viral LRTI with 38% [18-62] sensitivity and 91% [76-98] specificity. Conclusions: Transcriptional profiling can be used as a helpful tool for the diagnosis of adults hospitalized with LRTI. 158 samples, no replicates; bacterial LRTI n=22, viral LRTI n=71, bacterial-viral coinfections n=25, and healthy controls n=40
2015-09-14 | E-GEOD-60244 | biostudies-arrayexpress
Project description:BackgroundAntibiotic resistance is a global health challenge and the close correlation between antibiotic use and the development of resistance makes it essential to maintain a rational use of antibiotics. Most antibiotics are prescribed in general practice against acute respiratory tract infections (ARTI), even though most of these infections are of viral etiology. Thus, a safe method to substantially reduce unnecessary use of antibiotics in general practice is needed. Procalcitonin (PCT) is a precursor protein with very low circulating levels in the blood under physiological conditions. However, in response serious bacterial infection the level of PCT in the blood may increase significantly. Until recently, quantitative analyses of PCT was performed in hospital laboratories, impeding the implementation of PCT in primary care. Our aim is to determine whether it is possible to lower the use of antibiotics in patients presenting with symptoms of ARTI, without significantly prolonging the period of illness, by using a newly released PCT point-of-care test in general practice.MethodsThe Procalcitonin-Guided Antibiotics in Respiratory Infections (PARI) study is a randomized, single-blinded, non-inferiority, multi-practice intervention study comparing a PCT-group to a control group. Patients (N = 508) will be randomly assigned 1:1 to standard care or to the PCT group. The primary outcomes the duration of illness and symptoms from ARTI measured with the Acute Respiratory Tract Infection Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include (1) Number of participants in each trial arm exposed to antibiotic treatment at index consultation (day 1) and within 30 days, (2) Number of participants in each trial arm with side effects from antibiotic treatment within 14 days, (3) Number of participants in each trial arm with re-consultations within 30 days, (4) Number of participants in each trial arm admitted to hospital (including diagnosis and mortality) within 30 days, (5) Characterization of biomarker (CRP and PCT) level at index consultation. Tertiary outcomes include patient and general practitioner satisfaction with the use of the PCT point-of-care test, and long-term follow-up.DiscussionTo our knowledge, this is the first study to examine a PCT point-of-care test in general practice with the aim of reducing the use of antibiotics in patients with symptoms of ARTI. Results of this study may prove important in targeting antibiotic treatment only to those patients who need it, thus contributing to limiting the spread of antibiotic resistance.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04216277 , date of registration: 2. of January 2020.
| S-EPMC8917812 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) refer to the inflammation of the trachea, bronchi, bronchioles, and lung tissue. Old people have an increased risk of developing LRTIs compared to young adults. The prevalence of LRTIs in the elderly population is not only related to underlying diseases and aging itself, but also to a variety of clinical issues, such as history of hospitalization, previous antibacterial therapy, mechanical ventilation, antibiotic resistance. These factors mentioned above have led to an increase in the prevalence and mortality of LRTIs in the elderly, and new medical strategies targeting LRTIs in this population are urgently needed. After a systematic review of the current randomized controlled trials and related studies, we recommend novel pharmacotherapies that demonstrate advantages for the management of LRTIs in people over the age of 65. We also briefly reviewed current medications for respiratory communicable diseases in the elderly. Various sources of information were used to ensure all relevant studies were included. We searched Pubmed, MEDLINE (OvidSP), EMBASE (OvidSP), and ClinicalTrials.gov. Strengths and limitations of these drugs were evaluated based on whether they have novelty of mechanism, favorable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles, avoidance of interactions and intolerance, simplicity of dosing, and their ability to cope with challenges which was mainly evaluated by the primary and secondary endpoints. The purpose of this review is to recommend the most promising antibiotics for treatment of LRTIs in the elderly (both in hospital and in the outpatient setting) based on the existing results of clinical studies with the novel antibiotics, and to briefly review current medications for respiratory communicable diseases in the elderly, aiming to a better management of LRTIs in clinical practice.
| S-EPMC6836807 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC523106 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundAnti-microbial resistance (AMR) is a global threat to public health and antibiotics are often unnecessarily prescribed for acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) in general practice. We aimed to investigate why general practitioners (GPs) continue to prescribe antibiotics for ARTIs despite increasing knowledge of their poor efficacy and worsening antimicrobial resistance.MethodsWe used an explorative qualitative study design. Thirteen GPs were recruited through purposive sampling to represent urban and rural settings and years of experience. They were based in general practices within the Mid-West of Ireland. GPs took part in semi-structured interviews that were digitally audio recorded and transcribed.ResultsThree main themes and three subthemes were identified. Themes include (1) non-comprehensive guidelines; how guideline adherence can be difficult, (2) GPs under pressure; pressures to prescribe from patients and perceived patient expectations and (3) Unnecessary prescribing; how to address it and the potential of public interventions to reduce it.ConclusionsGPs acknowledge their failure to implement guidelines because they feel they are less usable in clinical situations. GPs felt pressurised to prescribe, especially for fee-paying patients and in out of hours settings (OOH), suggesting the need for interventions that target the public's perceptions of antibiotics. GPs behaviours surrounding prescribing antibiotics need to change in order to reduce AMR and change patients' expectations.
| S-EPMC6374900 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The purpose of the study was to analyze the effectiveness of adding nebulized antibiotics to systemic antimicrobials in critically ill patients with respiratory tract infections (pneumonia or tracheobronchitis) and the effect on renal function. A retrospective observational cohort study including critically ill patients with respiratory tract infections during a 2-year period was conducted. Intervention group included patients that received nebulized and systemic antimicrobials. Patients in the control group received only systemic antimicrobials. Clinical resolution was the primary endpoint. Secondary outcomes included change in fever, inflammatory parameters, and creatinine clearance; length of hospital stay, systemic therapy, and mechanical ventilation; hospital readmission; and mortality. Regression models were performed to estimate the effect of nebulized antibiotics on outcome variables adjusted by potential confounders. A total of 136 patients were included (93 in control group and 43 in intervention group). The intervention group had higher odds of clinical resolution (adjusted odds ratio (OR): 7.1; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.2, 43.3). Nebulized antibiotic therapy was independently associated with reduction in procalcitonin (adjusted OR: 12.4; 95% CI: 1.4, 109.7). There were no significant differences in the rest of the secondary outcomes or in creatinine clearance reduction. Adding nebulized antibiotics for the management of respiratory tract infections has a positive impact on clinical resolution without increasing the risk of renal toxicity.
| S-EPMC7223945 | biostudies-literature