Dataset Information

Guideline removal of atropine and survival after adult in-hospital cardiac arrest with a non-shockable rhythm.

ABSTRACT:

Aim

To determine whether the removal of atropine from the 2010 ACLS guidelines for non-shockable cardiac arrests was associated with a change in survival.

Methods

Using the Get With The Guidelines^®-Resuscitation registry, we included adults with an index in-hospital cardiac arrest between 2006 and 2015. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included return of spontaneous circulation and favorable functional outcome. An interrupted time-series analysis was used to compare survival before (pre-guidelines) and after (post-guidelines) introduction of the 2010 guidelines. A difference-in-difference approach was used to compare the interrupted time-series results between the non-shockable and shockable cohorts to account for guideline changes unrelated to atropine.

Results

We included 20,499 non-shockable and 3968 shockable cardiac arrests. Patient characteristics were similar between the pre-guidelines and post-guidelines period. Atropine was used for 8653 (87%) non-shockable and 680 (35%) shockable cardiac arrests in the pre-guidelines period and 3643 (35%) non-shockable and 320 (16%) shockable cardiac arrests in the post-guidelines period. The change over time in survival from the pre-guidelines to the post-guidelines period was not significantly different for the non-shockable compared to the shockable cohort (risk difference: 2.0% [95%CI: -0.8, 4.8] per year, p = 0.17). The immediate change in survival after introducing the guidelines was also not different between the cohorts (risk difference: 3.5% [95%CI: -2.6, 9.7], p = 0.26). Results were similar for the secondary outcomes and in multiple sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions

The removal of atropine from the 2010 guidelines was not associated with a significant change in survival.

SUBMITTER: Holmberg MJ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6467532 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Guideline removal of atropine and survival after adult in-hospital cardiac arrest with a non-shockable rhythm.

Holmberg Mathias J MJ Moskowitz Ari A Wiberg Sebastian S Grossestreuer Anne V AV Yankama Tuyen T Witten Lise L Perman Sarah M SM Donnino Michael W MW Andersen Lars W LW

Resuscitation 20190213

<h4>Aim</h4>To determine whether the removal of atropine from the 2010 ACLS guidelines for non-shockable cardiac arrests was associated with a change in survival.<h4>Methods</h4>Using the Get With The Guidelines<sup>®</sup>-Resuscitation registry, we included adults with an index in-hospital cardiac arrest between 2006 and 2015. The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included return of spontaneous circulation and favorable functional outcome. An interrupted ti ...[more]

PMID: 30771452

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and importanceBystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and initial shockable rhythm are crucial predictors of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, the relationship between dispatcher-assisted CPR (DA-CPR) and initial shockable rhythm is not completely elucidated.ObjectiveTo examine the association of DA-CPR with initial shockable rhythm and outcomes.Design, setting and participantsThis nationwide population-based observational study conducted in Japan included 59 688 patients with witnessed OHCA of cardiac origin after excluding those without bystander CPR. Patients were divided into DA-CPR (n = 42 709) and CPR without dispatcher assistance (unassisted CPR, n = 16 979) groups.Outcome measures and analysisThe primary outcome measure was initial shockable rhythm, and secondary outcome measures were 1-month survival and neurologically intact survival. A Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for collapse-to-first-rhythm-analysis time and multivariable logistic regression models were used after propensity score (PS) matching to compare the incidence of initial shockable rhythm and outcomes, respectively.Main resultsAmong all patients (mean age 76.7 years), the rates of initial shockable rhythm, 1-month survival and neurologically intact survival were 20.8, 10.7 and 7.0%, respectively. The incidence of initial shockable rhythm in the DA-CPR group (20.4%, 3462/16 979) was significantly higher than that in the unassisted CPR group (18.5%, 3133/16 979) after PS matching (P < 0.0001). However, no significant differences were found between the two groups with respect to the incidence of initial shockable rhythm in the Cox proportional hazards model [adjusted hazard ratio of DA-CPR for initial shockable rhythm compared with unassisted CPR, 0.99; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.97-1.02, P = 0.56]. No significant differences were observed in the survival rates in the two groups after PS matching [10.8% (1833/16 979) vs. 10.3% (1752/16 979), P = 0.16] and neurologically intact survival rates [7.3% (1233/16 979) vs. 6.8% (1161/16 979), P = 0.13]. The multivariable logistic regression model showed no significant differences between the groups with regard to survival (adjusted odds ratio of DA-CPR compared with unassisted CPR: 1.00; 95% CI, 0.89-1.13, P = 0.97) and neurologically intact survival (adjusted odds ratio: 1.12; 95% CI, 0.98-1.29, P = 0.14).ConclusionDA-CPR after OHCA had the same independent association with the likelihood of initial shockable rhythm and 1-month meaningful outcome as unassisted CPR.

Project description:ImportanceDelayed defibrillation (>2 minutes) in adult in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is associated with worse outcomes. Little is known about the timing and outcomes of defibrillation in pediatric IHCA.ObjectiveTo determine whether time to first defibrillation attempt in pediatric IHCA with a first documented shockable rhythm is associated with survival to hospital discharge.Design, setting, and participantsIn this cohort study, data were obtained from the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation national registry between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2015, and analyses were completed by October 1, 2017. Participants were pediatric patients younger than 18 years with an IHCA and a first documented rhythm of pulseless ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation and at least 1 defibrillation attempt.ExposuresTime between loss of pulse and first defibrillation attempt.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were return of circulation, 24-hour survival, and favorable neurologic outcome at hospital discharge.ResultsAmong 477 patients with a pulseless shockable rhythm (median [interquartile range] age, 4 years [3 months to 14 years]; 285 [60%] male), 338 (71%) had a first defibrillation attempt at 2 minutes or less after pulselessness. Children were less likely to be shocked in 2 minutes or less for ward vs intensive care unit IHCAs (48% [11 of 23] vs 72% [268 of 371]; P = .01]). Thirty-eight percent (179 patients) survived to hospital discharge. The median (interquartile range) reported time to first defibrillation attempt was 1 minute (0-3 minutes) in both survivors and nonsurvivors. Time to first defibrillation attempt was not associated with survival in unadjusted analysis (risk ratio [RR] per minute increase, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.92-1.01; P = .15) or adjusted analysis (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.94-1.06; P = .86). There was no difference in survival between those with a first defibrillation attempt in 2 minutes or less vs more than 2 minutes in unadjusted analysis (132 of 338 [39%] vs 47 of 139 [34%]; RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.66-1.13; P = .29) or multivariable analysis (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.75-1.30; P = .93). Time to first defibrillation attempt was also not associated with secondary outcome measures.Conclusions and relevanceIn contrast to published adult IHCA and pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest data, no significant association was observed between time to first defibrillation attempt in pediatric IHCA with a first documented shockable rhythm and survival to hospital discharge.

Project description:BackgroundSingapore and Osaka in Japan have comparable population sizes and prehospital management; however, the frequency of ECPR differs greatly for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with initial shockable rhythm. Given this disparity, we hypothesized that the outcomes among the OHCA patients with initial shockable rhythm in Singapore were different from those in Osaka. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of OHCA patients with initial shockable rhythm in Singapore compared to the expected outcomes derived from Osaka data using machine learning-based prediction models.MethodsThis was a secondary analysis of two OHCA databases: the Singapore PAROS database (SG-PAROS) and the Osaka-CRITICAL database from Osaka, Japan. This study included adult (18-74 years) OHCA patients with initial shockable rhythm. A machine learning-based prediction model was derived and validated using data from the Osaka-CRITICAL database (derivation data 2012-2017, validation data 2018-2019), and applied to the SG-PAROS database (2010-2016 data), to predict the risk-adjusted probability of favorable neurological outcomes. The observed and expected outcomes were compared using the observed-expected ratio (OE ratio) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).ResultsFrom the SG-PAROS database, 1,789 patients were included in the analysis. For OHCA patients who achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) on hospital arrival, the observed favorable neurological outcome was at the same level as expected (OE ratio: 0.905 [95%CI: 0.784-1.036]). On the other hand, for those who had continued cardiac arrest on hospital arrival, the outcomes were lower than expected (shockable rhythm on hospital arrival, OE ratio: 0.369 [95%CI: 0.258-0.499], and nonshockable rhythm, OE ratio: 0.137 [95%CI: 0.065-0.235]).ConclusionThis observational study found that the outcomes for patients with initial shockable rhythm but who did not obtain ROSC on hospital arrival in Singapore were lower than expected from Osaka. We hypothesize this is mainly due to differences in the use of ECPR.

Project description:ObjectiveTo determine if the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) predicts out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes better than age?Design: The analysed data was collected as part of a larger study run by NCEPOD on hospital admissions for OHCA in 2018. Study selection was OHCA in over 16-year-olds with restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) for >20 mins and who were admitted to hospital, or who died in the emergency department. Patients from hospitals in England, Wales and Northern Ireland were identified using standard coding for cardiac arrest. CFS, age and gender were examined against two binary outcomes (non-shockable rhythm and survival).Results304 patients with a known CFS, known original rhythm, and known outcome were included. Younger patients had lower CFSs, as a continuous variable (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.44, p-value < 0.001) and in CFS groupings of 1-3, 4-6, 7-9 (p-value < 0.001). CFSs were higher (p-values < 0.001) for both non-shockable rhythm and death (median CFS was 4 for death and 2 for survivors). Logistic regression analysis of continuous scale CFS showed the association with non-shockable rhythm remained when adjusted for age and sex (odds ratio [95% CI]; age adjustment 1.46 [1.28, 1.68] p-value < 0.001) and remained for survival when adjusted for age alone (odds ratio [95% CI]; 1.60 [1.36, 1.88] p-value < 0.001) and when adjusted for age, sex and initial rhythm combined (1.45 [1.21, 1.73] p-value < 0.001). 3.2% of patients had resuscitation against their advanced-care-directives. 12.9% (23/178) of hospitals had electronic systems which shared advance-care-directives with ambulance services and primary care.ConclusionA higher CFS is a prognostic indicator in adult OHCA independent of age. Frail individuals have a lower likelihood of a shockable rhythm and poorer survival. Sensitive sharing of this information with patients when discussing advance-care-directives may enhance shared decision-making.

Project description:BackgroundThe TiPS65 score is a validated scoring system used to predict neurological outcomes in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients with shockable rhythm treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). This study aimed to assess the predictive performance of the TiPS65 score in OHCA patients with initial non-shockable rhythm treated with ECPR.MethodsThis was a secondary analysis using the JAAM-OHCA registry, a multicenter prospective cohort study. The study included adult OHCA patients with initial non-shockable rhythm who underwent ECPR. The TiPS65 score assigned one point to each of four variables: time to hospital ≤25 minutes, pH value ≥7.0 on initial blood gas assessment, shockable on hospital arrival, and age younger than 65 years. Based on the sum score, the predictive performance for 1-month survival and favorable neurological outcomes, defined as the Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2, was evaluated.ResultsAmong 57,754 patients in the registry, 370 were included in the analysis. The overall one-month survival and favorable neurological outcome were 11.1% (41/370) and 4.2% (15/370), respectively. The 1-month survival rates based on the TiPS65 score were as follows: 11.2% (12/107) for 0 points, 9.3% (14/150) for 1 point, 10.0% (9/90) for 2 points, and 26.1% (6/23) for ≥3 points. Similarly, the 1-month favorable neurological outcomes were: 5.6% (6/107) for 0 points, 2.7% (4/150) for 1 point, 4.4% (4/90) for 2 points, and 4.3% (1/23) for ≥3 points. The area under the curve was 0.535 (95% CI: 0.437-0.630) for 1-month survival and 0.530 (95% CI: 0.372-0.683) for 1-month neurological outcome.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that the TiPS65 score has limited prognostic performance among OHCA patients with initial non-shockable rhythm treated with ECPR. Further research is warranted to develop a predictive tool specifically focused on OHCA with initial non-shockable rhythm to aid in determining candidates for ECPR.

Project description:ObjectivesTo evaluate whether patients who experience cardiac arrest in hospital receive epinephrine (adrenaline) within the two minutes after the first defibrillation (contrary to American Heart Association guidelines) and to evaluate the association between early administration of epinephrine and outcomes in this population.DesignProspective observational cohort study.SettingAnalysis of data from the Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry, which includes data from more than 300 hospitals in the United States.ParticipantsAdults in hospital who experienced cardiac arrest with an initial shockable rhythm, including patients who had a first defibrillation within two minutes of the cardiac arrest and who remained in a shockable rhythm after defibrillation.InterventionEpinephrine given within two minutes after the first defibrillation.Main outcome measuresSurvival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital discharge with a good functional outcome. A propensity score was calculated for the receipt of epinephrine within two minutes after the first defibrillation, based on multiple characteristics of patients, events, and hospitals. Patients who received epinephrine at either zero, one, or two minutes after the first defibrillation were then matched on the propensity score with patients who were "at risk" of receiving epinephrine within the same minute but who did not receive it.Results2978 patients were matched on the propensity score, and the groups were well balanced. 1510 (51%) patients received epinephrine within two minutes after the first defibrillation, which is contrary to current American Heart Association guidelines. Epinephrine given within the first two minutes after the first defibrillation was associated with decreased odds of survival in the propensity score matched analysis (odds ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.82; P<0.001). Early epinephrine administration was also associated with a decreased odds of return of spontaneous circulation (0.71, 0.60 to 0.83; P<0.001) and good functional outcome (0.69, 0.58 to 0.83; P<0.001).ConclusionHalf of patients with a persistent shockable rhythm received epinephrine within two minutes after the first defibrillation, contrary to current American Heart Association guidelines. The receipt of epinephrine within two minutes after the first defibrillation was associated with decreased odds of survival to hospital discharge as well as decreased odds of return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital discharge with a good functional outcome.

Dataset Information

Guideline removal of atropine and survival after adult in-hospital cardiac arrest with a non-shockable rhythm.

Aim

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Guideline removal of atropine and survival after adult in-hospital cardiac arrest with a non-shockable rhythm.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets