Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in heart transplant recipients.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Anderson L
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6478176 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundHeart Transplant (HTx) is the ultimate chance of life for end stage Heart Failure (HF). Exercise training has consistently shown the potential to improve functional capacity in various chronic heart diseases. Still, the evidence in HTx recipients is scarcer. This study aims to systematically review the literature to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Exercise-based Cardiac Rehabilitation (EBCR) in HTx recipients and to identify possible moderators of success.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the effect and safety of EBCR in adult HTx recipients. The primary outcome was functional capacity, measured by Peak Oxygen Uptake (pVO2). We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Knowledge databases until December 2020, reviewed references of relevant articles and contacted experts. Usual care (UC), the different dosages of exercise regimens and alternative settings were allowed as comparators. A quantitative synthesis of evidence was performed using random-effects meta-analyses.ResultsA total of 11 studies with 404 patients were included. Nine studies comprising 306 patients compared EBCR with usual care. They showed that EBCR improved pVO2 compared to usual care (Mean Difference [MD] 3.03 mL/kg/min, 95% CI [2.28-3.77]; I 2 = 32%). In the subgroup analysis, including length of intervention and timing of enrollment after HTx, no significant moderator was found. Two trials, with 98 patients total, compared High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) and Moderate Intensity Continuous Training (MICT). HIIT attained a significant edge over MICT (MD 2.23 mL/kg/min, 95% CI [1.79-2.67]; I 2 = 0%). No major adverse events associated with EBCR were reported.ConclusionWe found moderate quality evidence suggesting EBCR has a significant benefit on functional capacity improvement HTx recipients at the short-term. HIIT showed superiority when compared to MICT. Research focusing long term outcomes and standardized protocols are needed to improve evidence on EBCR effectiveness.
| S-EPMC10034295 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6491180 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8571912 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6492482 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimsCoronary heart disease is the most common reason for referral to exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) globally. However, the generalizability of previous meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is questioned. Therefore, a contemporary updated meta-analysis was undertaken.Methods and resultsDatabase and trial registry searches were conducted to September 2020, seeking RCTs of exercise-based interventions with ≥6-month follow-up, compared with no-exercise control for adults with myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, or following coronary artery bypass graft, or percutaneous coronary intervention. The outcomes of mortality, recurrent clinical events, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis, and cost-effectiveness data were narratively synthesized. Meta-regression was used to examine effect modification. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. A total of 85 RCTs involving 23 430 participants with a median 12-month follow-up were included. Overall, exercise-based CR was associated with significant risk reductions in cardiovascular mortality [risk ratio (RR): 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64-0.86, number needed to treat (NNT): 37], hospitalizations (RR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.67-0.89, NNT: 37), and myocardial infarction (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.70-0.96, NNT: 100). There was some evidence of significantly improved HRQoL with CR participation, and CR is cost-effective. There was no significant impact on overall mortality (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.89-1.04), coronary artery bypass graft (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.80-1.15), or percutaneous coronary intervention (RR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.69-1.02). No significant difference in effects was found across different patient groups, CR delivery models, doses, follow-up, or risk of bias.ConclusionThis review confirms that participation in exercise-based CR by patients with coronary heart disease receiving contemporary medical management reduces cardiovascular mortality, recurrent cardiac events, and hospitalizations and provides additional evidence supporting the improvement in HRQoL and the cost-effectiveness of CR.
| S-EPMC9902155 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AimsHeart transplantation (HTx) results in complete autonomic denervation of the donor heart, causing resting tachycardia and abnormal heart rate (HR) responses to exercise. We determined the time course of suggestive cardiac reinnervation post HTx and investigated its clinical significance.Methods and resultsHeart rate kinetics during standard cardiopulmonary exercise testing at 2.5-5 years after HTx was assessed in 58 patients. According to their HR increase 30 s after exercise onset, HTx recipients were classified as denervated (slow responders: <5 beats per minute [b.p.m.]) or potentially reinnervated (fast responders: ≥5 b.p.m.). Additionally, in 30 patients, longitudinal changes of maximal oxygen consumption and HR kinetics were assessed during the first 15 post-operative years. At 2.5-5 years post HTx, 38% of our study population was potentially reinnervated. Fast responders were significantly younger (41 ± 15 years) than slow responders (53 ± 13 years, P = 0.003) but did not differ with regard to donor age, immunosuppressive regime, cardiovascular risk factors, endomyocardial biopsy, or vasculopathy parameters. While HR reserve (56 ± 20 vs. 39 ± 15 b.p.m., P = 0.002) and HR recovery after 60 s (15 ± 11 vs. 5 ± 6 b.p.m., P < 0.001) were greater in fast responders, resting HR, peak HR of predicted, and peak oxygen consumption of predicted were comparable.ConclusionsSigns of reinnervation occurred mainly in younger patients. Maximal oxygen consumption was independent of HR kinetics.
| S-EPMC8006603 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The heart rate (HR) rises with increased power output, whereby in most healthy individuals, the slope of HR levels off with higher intensity. This corresponds to a downward deflection of the heart rate performance curve (HRPC). Conversely, in patients after myocardial infarction, an upward HRPC deflection is frequently observed that is especially pronounced in patients with compromised left ventricular ejection fraction. To investigate whether regular endurance training during cardiac rehabilitation might normalize HRPC, data of 128 male patients were analyzed. All patients performed three exercise tests: at baseline, after 6 weeks, and after 1 year. Ninety-six patients exercised regularly according to guidelines for 1 year (training group, TG), and 32 stopped after 6 weeks (control group, CG). Similarly, upward-deflected HRPCs were observed at baseline and after 6 weeks in both groups. After 1 year, TG patients had less upward-deflected HRPCs compared with CG ones, corresponding to a partial normalization. Greater changes in HRPC deflection were associated with larger improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness. Our results might indicate improved myocardial function due to long-term rehabilitation. Further, HRPC alterations over time should be considered when prescribing exercise intensities using a target HR, as deflection flattening might render the intensity of corresponding exercise insufficient.
| S-EPMC6852149 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Exercise training is recommended to patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and reduced ejection fraction at a class 1 evidence level. Currently the 'dose' of exercise (dose being both volume and intensity) still remains uncertain and the best form of aerobic exercise training has not been defined. Guidelines commonly use heart rate (HR) as a target factor for both moderate continuous and interval training exercises. However, exercise training guided by HR can be limited in CHF patients due to chronotropic incompetence and beta-blocker treatment. In our study, we systematically addressed the above issues by applying a training method that takes into account both the volume and intensity of exercise on an individual basis. This method is referred to as individual TRaining IMPulses (TRIMPi). In this review, we summarise a series of investigations that used TRIMPi and different exercise forms to quantify the optimum training load in CHF patients. This review also highlights the way TRIMPi and the individual exercise dose affects cardiorespiratory, metabolic and autonomic cardiac adaptations.
| S-EPMC5490988 | biostudies-other
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6491173 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has been recognized as an essential component of the treatment for coronary heart disease (CHD). Determining the efficacy of modern alternative treatment methods is the key to developing exercise-based CR programs. METHODS:Studies published through June 6, 2016, were identified using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. English-language articles regarding the efficacy of different modes of CR in patients with CHD were included in this analysis. Two investigators independently reviewed abstracts and full-text articles and extracted data from the studies. According to the categories described by prior Cochrane reviews, exercise-based CR was classified into center-based CR, home-based CR, tele-based CR, and combined CR for this analysis. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, recurrent fatal and/or nonfatal myocardial infarction, recurrent cardiac artery bypass grafting, recurrent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and hospital readmissions. RESULTS:Sixty randomized clinical trials (n?=?19,411) were included in the analysis. Network meta-analysis (NMA) demonstrated that only center-based CR significantly reduced all-cause mortality (center-based: RR?=?0.76 [95% CI 0.64-0.90], p?=?0.002) compared to usual care. Other modes of CR were not significantly different from usual care with regard to their ability to reduce mortality. Treatment ranking indicated that combined CR exhibited the highest probability (86.9%) of being the most effective mode, but this finding was not statistically significant due to the small sample size (combined: RR?=?0.50 [95% CI 0.20-1.27], p?=?0.146). CONCLUSIONS:Current evidence suggests that center-based CR is acceptable for patients with CHD. As home- and tele-based CR can save time, money, effort, and resources and may be preferred by patients, their efficacy should be investigated further in subsequent studies.
| S-EPMC6258639 | biostudies-literature