Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Multi-platform imaging in ABCA4-Associated Disease.


ABSTRACT: Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging is crucial to the diagnosis and monitoring of recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1). In a retrospective cohort study of 34 patients, we compared FAF imaging platforms varying in field size (30° and 55°: blue/SW-AF and NIR-AF; 200°: ultrawide-field, UWF-AF), excitation wavelength (488?nm, blue/SW-AF; 532?nm, UWF-AF and 787?nm, NIR-AF) and image processing. Due to reduced absorption of 532?nm and 787?nm light by macular pigment, foveal sparing was more readily demonstrable by green/UWF-AF and NIR-AF imaging. Prominent in green/UWF-AF images is a central zone of relatively elevated AF that is continuous inferonasal with a demarcation line bordering lower AF nasally and higher AF temporally. This zone and border are more visible in STGD1 than in healthy eyes and more visible with green/UWF-AF. With the development of AF flecks, inferonasal retina is initially spared. Central atrophic areas were larger in NIR-AF images than in blue/SW-AF and green/UWF-AF images and the presence of a contiguous hyperAF ring varied with imaging modality. Flecks visible as hyperAF foci in blue/SW-AF images were also visible in green/UWF-AF but were often hypoAF in NIR-AF. Since disease in STGD1 often extends beyond the 30° and 55° fields, green/UWF-AF has advantages including for pediatric patients. The imaging platforms examined provided complementary information.

SUBMITTER: Chen L 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6478712 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Multi-platform imaging in ABCA4-Associated Disease.

Chen Lijuan L   Lee Winston W   de Carvalho Jose Ronaldo Lima JRL   Chang Stanley S   Tsang Stephen H SH   Allikmets Rando R   Sparrow Janet R JR  

Scientific reports 20190423 1


Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging is crucial to the diagnosis and monitoring of recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1). In a retrospective cohort study of 34 patients, we compared FAF imaging platforms varying in field size (30° and 55°: blue/SW-AF and NIR-AF; 200°: ultrawide-field, UWF-AF), excitation wavelength (488 nm, blue/SW-AF; 532 nm, UWF-AF and 787 nm, NIR-AF) and image processing. Due to reduced absorption of 532 nm and 787 nm light by macular pigment, foveal sparing was more readily d  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4306619 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4283973 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8026542 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4448589 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7538899 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5730472 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5477356 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5846118 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4572941 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8044215 | biostudies-literature