Dataset Information

Effectiveness of Remission Induction Strategies for Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: a Systematic Literature Review.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose of review

To review the effectiveness of remission induction strategies compared to single csDMARD-initiating strategies according to current guidelines in early RA.

Recent findings

Twenty-nine studies, heterogeneous on, e.g., specific treatment strategy and remission outcome used, were identified. Using DAS28-remission over 12 months, 13 (76%) of 17 remission induction strategies showed significantly more patients achieving remission. Pooled relative "risk" was 1.73 [95%CI 1.59-1.88] for bDMARD-based remission induction strategies and 1.20 [95%CI 1.03-1.40] for combination csDMARD-based remission induction strategies compared to single csDMARD-initiating strategies. When additional glucocorticoid "bridging therapy" was used in single csDMARD-initiating strategies, the higher proportion patients achieving remission in remission induction strategies was no longer statistically significant (pooled RR 1.06 [95%CI 0.83-1.35]). For other remission outcomes, results were in line with above. Remission induction strategies are more effective in achieving remission compared to single csDMARD-initiating strategies, possibly more so in bDMARD-based induction strategies. However, compared to single csDMARD-initiating strategies with glucocorticoids, induction strategies may not be more effective.

SUBMITTER: Verhoeven MMA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6478774 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effectiveness of Remission Induction Strategies for Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: a Systematic Literature Review.

Verhoeven M M A MMA Welsing P M J PMJ Bijlsma J W J JWJ van Laar J M JM Lafeber F P J G FPJG Tekstra J J Jacobs J W G JWG

Current rheumatology reports 20190423 6

<h4>Purpose of review</h4>To review the effectiveness of remission induction strategies compared to single csDMARD-initiating strategies according to current guidelines in early RA.<h4>Recent findings</h4>Twenty-nine studies, heterogeneous on, e.g., specific treatment strategy and remission outcome used, were identified. Using DAS28-remission over 12 months, 13 (76%) of 17 remission induction strategies showed significantly more patients achieving remission. Pooled relative "risk" was 1.73 [95%C ...[more]

PMID: 31016409

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Early diagnosis and treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) with conventional and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs have vastly improved outcomes for children with these diseases. Currently, a large proportion of children with JIA are able to achieve clinical inactive disease and remission. With this success, important questions have arisen about when medications can be stopped and how to balance the risks and benefits of continuing medications versus the potential for flare after stopping. AIM:The aim was to conduct a systematic review of the available literature to summarize current evidence about medication withdrawal for JIA in remission. METHODS:We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed and Embase from 1990 to 2019. References were first screened by title and then independently screened by title and abstract by two authors. A total of 77 original papers were selected for full-text review. Data were extracted from 30 papers on JIA and JIA-associated uveitis, and the quality of the evidence was evaluated using National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) tools. Studies on biochemical and radiologic biomarkers were also reviewed and summarized. RESULTS:Most studies investigating treatment withdrawal in JIA have been observational and of poor or fair quality; interpretations of these studies have been limited by differences in study populations, disease and remission durations, the medications withdrawn, approaches to withdrawal, and definitions of disease outcomes. Overall the data suggest that flares are common after stopping JIA medications, particularly biologic medications. Clinical characteristics associated with increased risks of flare have not been consistently identified. Biochemical biomarkers and ultrasound findings have been shown to predict outcomes after stopping medications, but to date, no such predictor has been consistently validated across JIA populations. Studies have also not identified optimal strategies for withdrawing medication for well-controlled JIA. Promising withdrawal strategies include discontinuing methotrexate before biologic medications in children receiving combination therapy, dose reduction for children on biologics, and treat-to-target approaches to withdrawal. These and other strategies require further investigation in larger, high-quality studies. CONCLUSIONS:The published literature on treatment withdrawal in JIA has varied in design and quality, yielding little conclusive evidence thus far on the management of JIA in remission. Given the importance of this question, international collaborative efforts are underway to study clinical and biologic predictors of successful medication withdrawal in JIA. These efforts may ultimately support the development of personalized approaches to withdrawing medication in children with JIA in remission.

Project description:IntroductionAlthough bDMARDs are effective in the treatment of RA, they are associated with dose-dependent side effects, patient burden, and high costs. Recently, many studies have investigated the possibility of discontinuing or tapering bDMARDs when patients have reached their treatment goal. The aim of this review is to provide a narrative overview of the existing evidence on bDMARD dose reduction and to provide answers to specific dose-reduction-related questions that are of interest to clinicians.MethodsWe systematically searched for relevant studies in four scientific databases. Furthermore, we screened the references of reviews and relevant studies.ResultsOur searches resulted in 45 original studies of bDMARD dose reduction in RA patients (15 RCTs and 30 observational studies). Current evidence shows that bDMARD dose reduction can be considered in all RA patients who achieve stable (e.g., ≥6 months) low disease activity or remission. The best strategies seem to be disease-activity-guided dose optimization and fixed dose reduction, since direct bDMARD discontinuation (without restarting) results in a high flare rate, worse physical functioning, and more joint damage. When tapering the bDMARD treatment of a patient, disease activity should be monitored closely, and if a flare occurs, the dose should be increased to the lowest effective dose. Current evidence shows that restarting bDMARD treatment is effective and safe. Unfortunately, no clear predictors of successful dose reduction have been identified so far.ConclusionThe current evidence and rising healthcare costs urge that dose reduction should be considered for eligible patients. However, the decision to start dose reduction should be made in shared decision-making. Future research should focus not only on a better understanding of the effects of dose reduction on clinical outcomes but also on the perspectives of patients and physicians as well as the implementation of this new treatment principle.

Project description:Background and objectivesEconomic evaluations provide information to aid the optimal utilization of limited healthcare resources. Costs of biologics for Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are remarkably high, which makes these agents an important target for economic evaluations. This systematic review aims to identify existing studies examining the cost-effectiveness of biologics for RA, assess their quality and report their results systematically.MethodsA literature search covering Medline, Scopus, Cochrane library, ACP Journal club and Web of Science was performed in March 2013. The cost-utility analyses (CUAs) of one or more available biological drugs for the treatment of RA in adults were included. Two independent investigators systematically collected information and assessed the quality of the studies. To enable the comparison of the results, all costs were converted to 2013 euro.ResultsOf the 4890 references found in the literature search, 41 CUAs were included in the current systematic review. While considering only direct costs, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) ranged from 39,000 to 1,273,000 €/quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained in comparison to conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs) in cDMARD naïve patients. Among patients with an insufficient response to cDMARDs, biologics were associated with ICERs ranging from 12,000 to 708,000 €/QALY. Rituximab was found to be the most cost-effective alternative compared to other biologics among the patients with an insufficient response to TNFi.ConclusionsWhen 35,000 €/QALY is considered as a threshold for the ICER, TNFis do not seem to be cost-effective among cDMARD naïve patients and patients with an insufficient response to cDMARDs. With thresholds of 50,000 to 100,000 €/QALY biologics might be cost-effective among patients with an inadequate response to cDMARDs. Standardization of multiattribute utility instruments and a validated standard conversion method for missing utility measures would enable better comparison between CUAs.

Dataset Information

Effectiveness of Remission Induction Strategies for Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: a Systematic Literature Review.

Purpose of review

Recent findings

Publications

Effectiveness of Remission Induction Strategies for Early Rheumatoid Arthritis: a Systematic Literature Review.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets