Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Follow-up care after treatment for prostate cancer: evaluation of a supported self-management and remote surveillance programme.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Alternative models of cancer follow-up care are needed to ameliorate pressure on services and better meet survivors' long-term needs. This paper reports an evaluation of a service improvement initiative for the follow-up care of prostate cancer patients based on remote monitoring and supported self-management. METHODS:This multi-centred, historically controlled study compared patient reported outcomes of men experiencing the new Programme with men experiencing a traditional clinic appointment model of follow-up care, who were recruited in the period immediately prior to the introduction of the Programme. Data were collected by self-completed questionnaires, with follow up measurement at four and eight months post-baseline. The primary outcome was men's unmet survivorship needs, measured by the Cancer Survivors' Unmet Needs Survey. Secondary outcomes included cancer specific quality of life, psychological wellbeing and satisfaction with care. The analysis was intention to treat. Regression analyses were conducted for outcomes at each time point separately, controlling for pre-defined clinical and demographic variables. All outcome analyses are presented in the paper. Costs were compared between the two groups. RESULTS:Six hundred and twenty-seven men (61%) were consented to take part in the study (293 in the Programme and 334 in the comparator group.) Regarding the primary measure of unmet survivorship needs, 25 of 26 comparisons favoured the Programme, of which 4 were statistically significant. For the secondary measures of activation for self-management, quality of life, psychological well-being and lifestyle, 20 of 32 comparisons favoured the Programme and 3 were statistically significant. There were 22 items on the satisfaction with care questionnaire and 13 were statistically significant. Per participant costs (British pounds, 2015) in the 8?month follow up period were slightly lower in the programme than in the comparator group (£289 versus £327). The Programme was acceptable to patients. CONCLUSION:The Programme is shown to be broadly comparable to traditional follow-up care in all respects, adding to evidence of the viability of such models.

SUBMITTER: Frankland J 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6480799 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Follow-up care after treatment for prostate cancer: evaluation of a supported self-management and remote surveillance programme.

Frankland Jane J   Brodie Hazel H   Cooke Deborah D   Foster Claire C   Foster Rebecca R   Gage Heather H   Jordan Jake J   Mesa-Eguiagaray Ines I   Pickering Ruth R   Richardson Alison A  

BMC cancer 20190423 1


<h4>Background</h4>Alternative models of cancer follow-up care are needed to ameliorate pressure on services and better meet survivors' long-term needs. This paper reports an evaluation of a service improvement initiative for the follow-up care of prostate cancer patients based on remote monitoring and supported self-management.<h4>Methods</h4>This multi-centred, historically controlled study compared patient reported outcomes of men experiencing the new Programme with men experiencing a traditi  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8612701 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4280355 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3482620 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2311273 | biostudies-literature
2005-01-18 | GSE1907 | GEO
| EGAS00001000730 | EGA
| PRJEB3227 | ENA
| S-EPMC8655388 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8512153 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6258400 | biostudies-literature