Dataset Information

Modeling Exposure-Driven Adverse Event Time Courses in Oncology Exemplified by Afatinib.

ABSTRACT: Models were developed to characterize the relationship between afatinib exposure and diarrhea and rash/acne adverse event (AE) trajectories, and their predictive ability was assessed. Based on pooled data from seven phase II/III clinical studies including 998 patients, mixed-effects models for ordered categorical data were applied to describe daily AE severity. Clinical trial simulation aided by trial execution models was used for internal and external model evaluation. The final exposure-safety model consisted of longitudinal logistic regression models with first-order Markov elements for both AEs. Drug exposure was included as daily area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), and drug effects on the AEs were correlated. Clinical trial simulation allowed adequate prediction of maximum AE grades and AE severity time courses but overestimated the proportion of AE-dependent dose reductions and discontinuations. Both diarrhea and rash/acne were correlated with afatinib exposure. The developed modeling framework allows a prospective comparison of dosing strategies and study designs with respect to safety.

SUBMITTER: Niebecker R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6482278 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Modeling Exposure-Driven Adverse Event Time Courses in Oncology Exemplified by Afatinib.

Niebecker Ronald R Maas Hugo H Staab Alexander A Freiwald Matthias M Karlsson Mats O MO

CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology 20190227 4

Models were developed to characterize the relationship between afatinib exposure and diarrhea and rash/acne adverse event (AE) trajectories, and their predictive ability was assessed. Based on pooled data from seven phase II/III clinical studies including 998 patients, mixed-effects models for ordered categorical data were applied to describe daily AE severity. Clinical trial simulation aided by trial execution models was used for internal and external model evaluation. The final exposure-safety ...[more]

PMID: 30681293

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Thrombocytopenia is a major side-effect of cytotoxic cancer therapies. The aim of precision medicine is to develop therapy modifications accounting for the individual's risk. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPLE FINDINGS:To solve this task, we develop an individualized bio-mechanistic model of the dynamics of bone marrow thrombopoiesis, circulating platelets and therapy effects thereon. Comprehensive biological knowledge regarding cell differentiation, amplification, apoptosis rates, transition times and corresponding regulations are translated into ordinary differential equations. A model of osteoblast/osteoclast interactions was incorporated to mechanistically describe bone marrow support of quiescent cell stages. Thrombopoietin (TPO) as a major regulator is explicitly modelled including pharmacokinetics and-dynamics of TPO injections. Effects of cytotoxic drugs are modelled by transient depletions of proliferating cells. To calibrate the model, we used population data from the literature and close-meshed individual data of N = 135 high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients treated with CHOP-like chemotherapies. To limit the number of free parameters, several parsimony assumptions were derived from biological data and tested via Likelihood methods. Heterogeneity of patients was explained by a few model parameters. The over-fitting issue of individual parameter estimation was successfully dealt with a virtual participation of each patient in population-based experiments. The model qualitatively and quantitatively explains a number of biological observations such as the role of osteoblasts in explaining long-term toxic effects, megakaryocyte-mediated feedback on stem cells, bi-phasic stimulation of thrombopoiesis by TPO, dynamics of megakaryocyte ploidies and non-exponential platelet degradation. Almost all individual time series could be described with high precision. We demonstrated how the model can be used to provide predictions regarding individual therapy adaptations. CONCLUSIONS:We propose a mechanistic thrombopoiesis model of unprecedented comprehensiveness in both, biological mechanisms considered and experimental data sets explained. Our innovative method of parameter estimation allows robust determinations of individual parameter settings facilitating the development of individual treatment adaptations during chemotherapy.

Project description:Traditional methods of reporting adverse events in clinical trials are inadequate for modern cancer treatments with chronic administration. Conventional analysis and display of maximum grade adverse events do not capture toxicity profiles that evolve over time or longer lasting, lower grade toxic effects; we aimed to address this shortcoming in this study.We developed an analytic approach and standardised, comprehensive format, the Toxicity over Time (ToxT) approach, which combines graphs and adverse event tabular displays with multiple longitudinal statistical techniques into a readily applicable method to study toxic effects. Plots visualising summary statistics or individual patient data over discrete timepoints were combined with statistical methods including the following longitudinal techniques: repeated measures models that describe the changes in adverse events across all cycles of treatment; time-to-event analyses of first and worst grade toxicity; and area under the curve (AUC) analyses summarising adverse event profiles over the entire course of a study, including chronic low-grade events. We applied ToxT analysis to adverse event data from two completed North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG/Alliance) trials: N9741 (NCT00003594), in which different combinations of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan were investigated for metastatic colorectal cancer, and 979254, in which survivors of breast cancer were given venlafaxine or placebo for control of hot flashes.In trial NCCTG 979254 there was a higher incidence of late-occurring dry mouth in patients who were given venlafaxine than in those given placebo (week 1 [baseline]: 13% [six incidence in 48 patients, SD 5] vs 22% [11/49, SD 6]; p=0·20; week 5: 49% [24/49, 7] vs 2% [1/46, 2]; p<0·0001). In trial NCCTG N9741 there was an increased incidence of early nausea for patients given irinotecan plus oxaliplatin (IROX) compared with those given 5-fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX; cycle 1 mean grade nausea 1·1 [SD 1·0] vs 0·6 [0·7]; p<0·0001). Event charts showed earlier occurrences of higher grades of diarrhoea for patients given IROX compared with those given FOLFOX, and the AUC analysis shows a higher magnitude of diarrhoea consistently over time throughout the study in patients given IROX versus those given FOLFOX (mean AUC 4·2 [SD 5·2] vs 2·9 [4·2]; p<0·0001).The ToxT analytical approach incorporates the dimension of time into adverse event assessment and offers a more comprehensive depiction of toxic effects than present methods. With new, continuously administered targeted agents, immunotherapy, and maintenance regimens, these improved longitudinal analyses are directly relevant to patients and are crucial in cancer clinical trials.National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health and the Mayo Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Project description:INTRODUCTION:Adverse event (AE) under-reporting has been a recurrent issue raised during health authorities Good Clinical Practices (GCP) inspections and audits. Moreover, safety under-reporting poses a risk to patient safety and data integrity. The current clinical Quality Assurance (QA) practices used to detect AE under-reporting rely heavily on investigator site and study audits. Yet several sponsors and institutions have had repeated findings related to safety reporting, and this has led to delays in regulatory submissions. Recent developments in data management and IT systems allow data scientists to apply techniques such as machine learning to detect AE under-reporting in an automated fashion. OBJECTIVE:In this project, we developed a predictive model that enables Roche/Genentech Quality Program Leads oversight of AE reporting at the program, study, site, and patient level. This project was part of a broader effort at Roche/Genentech Product Development Quality to apply advanced analytics to augment and complement traditional clinical QA approaches. METHOD:We used a curated data set from 104 completed Roche/Genentech sponsored clinical studies to train a machine learning model to predict the expected number of AEs. Our final model used 54 features built on patient (e.g., demographics, vitals) and study attributes (e.g., molecule class, disease area). RESULTS:In order to evaluate model performance, we tested how well it would detect simulated test cases based on data not used for model training. For relevant simulation scenarios of 25%, 50%, and 75% under-reporting on the site level, our model scored an area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.62, 0.79, and 0.92, respectively. CONCLUSION:The model has been deployed to evaluate safety reporting performance in a set of ongoing studies in the form of a QA/dashboard cockpit available to Roche Quality Program Leads. Applicability and production performance will be assessed over the next 12-24 months in which we will develop a validation strategy to fully integrate our model into Roche QA processes.

Dataset Information

Modeling Exposure-Driven Adverse Event Time Courses in Oncology Exemplified by Afatinib.

Publications

Modeling Exposure-Driven Adverse Event Time Courses in Oncology Exemplified by Afatinib.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure