Dataset Information

Single-institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice.

ABSTRACT:

Background and aims

This retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated at the Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center investigated treatment patterns, survival, and safety with bevacizumab in a real-world setting.

Methods

Adult patients with glioblastoma who initiated bevacizumab at disease progression between January 1, 2009, and May 14, 2012, were included. A Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to describe overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time to greater than or equal to 20% reduction in Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). The effect of baseline demographic and clinical factors on survival was examined using a Cox proportional hazards model. Adverse event (AE) data were collected.

Results

Seventy-four patients, with a median age of 59 years, were included in this cohort. Between bevacizumab initiation and first failure, defined as the first disease progression after bevacizumab initiation, biweekly bevacizumab and bevacizumab/irinotecan were the most frequently prescribed regimens. Median duration of bevacizumab treatment until failure was 6.4 months (range, 0.5-58.7). Median OS and PFS from bevacizumab initiation were 11.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.3-13.4) and 6.4 months (95% CI, 3.9-8.5), respectively. Median time to greater than or equal to 20% reduction in KPS was 29.3 months (95% CI, 13.8-?). Lack of corticosteroid usage at the start of bevacizumab therapy was associated with both longer OS and PFS, with a median OS of 13.2 months (95% CI, 8.6-16.6) in patients who did not initially require corticosteroids versus 7.2 months (95% CI, 4.8-12.5) in those who did (P = 0.0382, log-rank), while median PFS values were 8.6 months (95% CI, 4.6-9.7) and 3.7 months (95% CI, 2.7-6.6), respectively (P = 0.0243, log-rank). Treatment failure occurred in 70 patients; 47 of whom received salvage therapy, and most frequently bevacizumab/carboplatin (7/47; 14.9%). Thirteen patients (18%) experienced a grade 3 AE of special interest for bevacizumab.

Conclusions

Treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab in a real-world setting were comparable with those reported in prospective clinical trials.

SUBMITTER: Desjardins A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6482327 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Single-institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice.

Desjardins Annick A Herndon James E JE McSherry Frances F Ravelo Arliene A Lipp Eric S ES Healy Patrick P Peters Katherine B KB Sampson John H JH Randazzo Dina D Sommer Nicolas N Friedman Allan H AH Friedman Henry S HS

Health science reports 20190213 4

<h4>Background and aims</h4>This retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated at the Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center investigated treatment patterns, survival, and safety with bevacizumab in a real-world setting.<h4>Methods</h4>Adult patients with glioblastoma who initiated bevacizumab at disease progression between January 1, 2009, and May 14, 2012, were included. A Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to describe overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) ...[more]

PMID: 31049419

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAnti-angiogenic therapy with bevacizumab is the most widely used treatment option for recurrent glioblastoma, but therapeutic response varies substantially and effective biomarkers for patient selection are not available. To this end, we determine whether novel quantitative radiomic strategies on the basis of MRI have the potential to noninvasively stratify survival and progression in this patient population.MethodsIn an initial cohort of 126 patients, we identified a distinct set of features representative of the radiographic phenotype on baseline (pretreatment) MRI. These selected features were evaluated on a second cohort of 165 patients from the multicenter BRAIN trial with prospectively acquired clinical and imaging data. Features were evaluated in terms of prognostic value for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and progression within 3, 6, and 9 months using baseline imaging and first follow-up imaging at 6 weeks posttreatment initiation.ResultsMultivariable analysis of features derived at baseline imaging resulted in significant stratification of OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.5; log-rank P = 0.001) and PFS (HR = 4.5; log-rank P = 2.1 × 10-5) in validation data. These stratifications were stronger compared with clinical or volumetric covariates (permutation test false discovery rate [FDR] <0.05). Univariable analysis of a prognostic textural heterogeneity feature (information correlation) derived from postcontrast T1-weighted imaging revealed significantly higher scores for patients who progressed within 3 months (Wilcoxon test P = 8.8 × 10-8). Generally, features derived from postcontrast T1-weighted imaging yielded higher prognostic power compared with precontrast enhancing T2-weighted imaging.ConclusionRadiomics provides prognostic value for survival and progression in patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab treatment. These results could lead to the development of quantitative pretreatment biomarkers to predict benefit from bevacizumab using standard of care imaging.

Dataset Information

Single-institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice.

Background and aims

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Single-institution retrospective review of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab in clinical practice.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets