Prophylactic chemotherapy for hydatidiform mole to prevent gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Wang Q
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6483742 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Sep
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Prophylactic chemotherapy for hydatidiform mole to prevent gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.
Wang Qiuyi Q Fu Jing J Hu Lina L Fang Fang F Xie Lingxia L Chen Hengxi H He Fan F Wu Taixiang T Lawrie Theresa A TA
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 20170911
<h4>Background</h4>This is an update of the original Cochrane Review published in Cochrane Library, Issue 10, 2012.Hydatidiform mole (HM), also called a molar pregnancy, is characterised by an overgrowth of foetal chorionic tissue within the uterus. HMs may be partial (PM) or complete (CM) depending on their gross appearance, histopathology and karyotype. PMs usually have a triploid karyotype, derived from maternal and paternal origins, whereas CMs are diploid and have paternal origins only. Mos ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundHydatidiform mole (HM), also called a molar pregnancy, is characterised by an overgrowth of foetal chorionic tissue within the uterus. HMs may be partial (PM) or complete (CM) depending on their gross appearance, histopathology and karyotype. PMs usually have a triploid karyotype, derived from maternal and paternal origins, whereas CMs are diploid and have paternal origins only. Most women with HM can be cured by evacuation of retained products of conception (ERPC) and their fertility preserved. However, in some women the growth persists and develops into gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN), a malignant form of the disease that requires treatment with chemotherapy. CMs have a higher rate of malignant transformation than PMs. It may be possible to reduce the risk of GTN in women with HM by administering prophylactic chemotherapy (P-Chem). However, P-Chem given before or after evacuation of HM to prevent malignant sequelae remains controversial, as the risks and benefits of this practice are unclear.ObjectivesTo systematically review the evidence for the effectiveness and safety of P-Chem to prevent GTN in women with a molar pregnancy.Search methodsWe performed electronic searches in the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 2, 2012), MEDLINE (1946 to February week 4, 2012) and EMBASE (1980 to week 9, 2012). The search strategy was developed using free text and medical subject headings (MESH). We handsearched reference lists of relevant literature to identify additional studies.Selection criteriaWe included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of P-Chem for HM.Data collection and analysisTwo review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion in the review and extracted data using a specifically designed data collection form. Meta-analyses were performed by pooling data from individual trials using RevMan 5.1 software.Main resultsWe included three RCTs with a combined total of 613 participants. One study compared prophylactic dactinomycin to no prophylaxis (60 participants); the other two studies compared prophylactic methotrexate to no prophylaxis (420 and 133 participants). All participants were diagnosed with CMs. We considered the latter two studies to be of poor methodological quality.P-Chem reduced the risk of GTN occurring in women following a CM (3 studies, 550 participants; RR 0.37; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24 to 0.57; I(2) = 0%; P < 0.00001), However, owing to the poor quality of two of the included studies, we performed sensitivity analyses excluding these two studies. This left only one small study of high-risk women to contribute data for this primary outcome (59 participants; RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.73; P = 0.01), therefore we consider this evidence to be of a low quality.The time to diagnosis was longer in the P-Chem group than the control group (2 studies, 33 participants; mean difference (MD) 28.72; 95% CI 13.19 to 44.24; P = 0.0003) and the P-Chem group required more courses to cure subsequent GTN (1 poor-quality study, 14 participants; MD 1.10; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.68; P = 0.0002). We consider this evidence to be of a low to very low quality for similar reasons to those listed above.There were insufficient data to perform meta-analyses for toxicity, overall survival, drug resistance and reproductive outcomes.Authors' conclusionsP-Chem may reduce the risk of progression to GTN in women with CMs who are at a high risk of malignant transformation; however, current evidence in favour of P-Chem is limited by the poor methodological quality and small size of the included studies. As P-Chem may increase drug resistance, delay treatment of GTN and expose women unnecessarily to toxic side effects, this practice cannot currently be recommended.
| S-EPMC6457751 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate whether prophylactic chemotherapy (P-chem) increased the drug resistance rate of postmolar GTN and whether the first-line chemotherapy should be different from P-chem.MethodsPostmolar GTN received P-Chem was defined as P-Chem group. Postmolar GTN without P-chem was randomly selected as control group according to the ratio of 1:3 (P-chem:control) and matched by age for low risk and high risk GTN separately.ResultsTotally 455 low-risk and 32 high-risk postmolar GTN patients were included. WHO risk score, chemotherapy cycles to achieve hCG normalization and resistant rate were similar between P-chem (27 cases) and control (81 cases) group. Among low-risk GTN patients, interval from hydatidiform mole to GTN was significantly longer in P-chem group than control (44 vs 69 days, P = 0.001). Total chemotherapy cycles and resistant rate were similar between low-risk GTN treated with same agent as P-chem (group A) and alternative agent (group B). But group A needed more chemotherapy cycles to achieve hCG normalization than group B.ConclusionsP-chem delayed the time to GTN diagnosis, but didn't increase risk score or lead to drug resistance of postmolar GTN. Alternative agent different from P-chem had the potential of enhancing chemotherapy response in low- risk postmolar GTN.
| S-EPMC9806869 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundGestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) is a highly curable group of pregnancy-related tumours; however, approximately 25% of GTN tumours will be resistant to, or will relapse after, initial chemotherapy. These resistant and relapsed lesions will require salvage chemotherapy with or without surgery. Various salvage regimens are used worldwide. It is unclear which regimens are the most effective and the least toxic.ObjectivesTo determine which chemotherapy regimen/s for the treatment of resistant or relapsed GTN is/are the most effective and the least toxic.Search methodsWe searched the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 4), MEDLINE and EMBASE up to October 2011. In addition, we handsearched the relevant society conference proceedings and study reference lists. For the updated review, we searched Cochrane Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE to 16 Novemeber 2015. In addition, we searched online clinical trial registries for ongoing trials.Selection criteriaOnly randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included.Data collection and analysisWe designed a data extraction form and planned to use random-effects methods in Review Manager 5.1 for meta-analyses.Main resultsThe search identified no RCTs; therefore we were unable to perform any meta-analyses.Authors' conclusionsRCTs in GTN are scarce owing to the low prevalence of this disease and its highly chemosensitive nature. As chemotherapeutic agents may be associated with substantial side effects, the ideal treatment should achieve maximum efficacy with minimal side effects. For methotrexate-resistant or recurrent low-risk GTN, a common practice is to use sequential five-day dactinomycin, followed by MAC (methotrexate, dactinomycin, cyclophosphamide) or EMA/CO (etoposide, methotrexate, dactinomycin, cyclophosphamide, vinblastine) if further salvage therapy is required. However, five-day dactinomycin is associated with more side effects than pulsed dactinomycin, therefore an RCT comparing the relative efficacy and safety of these two regimens in the context of failed primary methotrexate treatment is desirable.For high-risk GTN, EMA/CO is the most commonly used first-line therapy, with platinum-etoposide combinations, particularly EMA/EP (etoposide, methotrexate, dactinomycin/etoposide, cisplatin), being favoured as salvage therapy. Alternatives, including TP/TE (paclitaxel, cisplatin/ paclitaxel, etoposide), BEP (bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin), FAEV (floxuridine, dactinomycin, etoposide, vincristine) and FA (5-fluorouracil (5-FU), dactinomycin), may be as effective as EMA/EP and associated with fewer side effects; however, this is not clear from the available evidence and needs testing in well-designed RCTs. In the UK, an RCT comparing interventions for resistant/recurrent GTN will be very challenging owing to the small numbers of patients with this scenario. International multicentre collaboration is therefore needed to provide the high-quality evidence required to determine which salvage regimen/s have the best effectiveness-to-toxicity ratio in low- and high-risk disease. Future research should include economic evaluations and long-term surveillance for secondary neoplasms.
| S-EPMC6768657 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC4164471 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC6768658 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivePathogenic variations of the NLRP7 and KHDC3L genes are responsible for familial recurrent hydatidiform moles, a rare autosomal recessive phenomenon that can lead to severe comorbidities. Little is known about the diversity of genetic defects or the natural course of disease progression among recurrent hydatidiform mole cases from distinct ethnicities. In this study, we aimed to investigate the mutation profile and pregnancy outcomes in patients with multiple molar pregnancies.Material and methodsThree unrelated cases with recurrent molar pregnancies are included in this study. None of the patients had a known family history of molar pregnancy. Clinical findings and follow-up results are documented. Sanger sequencing is used to reveal genetic defects in exons and exon-intron boundaries of NLRP7 and KHDC3L genes.ResultsNLRP7 pathogenic variants were found in all three cases. In two cases, homozygous, c.2471+1G>A canonical splice cite variant was identified and in one case a homozygous, c.2571dupC (p.Ile858HisfsTer11) frameshift variant was identified. No variant in the KHDC3L gene was found in any case. In all cases, the development of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia complicated the clinical course and the treatment plans.ConclusionsWe found that defects of the NLRP7 gene are principally responsible for etiology in our region, and the mutation profile suggests a founder effect in the Turkish population. We suggest early genetic diagnosis and counseling in molar pregnancies and recommend close follow-up in terms of conversion to gestational trophoblastic neoplasia.
| S-EPMC10230829 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionCurrent evidence remains insufficient to strongly demonstrate the benefits of consolidation chemotherapy to all women with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN). This protocol outlines a systematic review to investigate whether consolidation chemotherapy is necessary for all patients with postmolar low-risk GTN after human chorionic gonadotropin normalisation with first-line single-agent chemotherapy.Methods and analysisA search string will be used to search the PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, Web of Sciences, Scopus, LILACS and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Articles will be screened at the title and abstract level, and then at the full article level by two independent reviewers using inclusion/exclusion criteria. Randomised and non-randomised study designs will be included, while case studies, commentaries, editorials, review articles, animal studies, basic science studies and cross-sectional studies, as well as studies not reporting relapse/recurrence rates and/or whether consolidation chemotherapy was delivered will be excluded. There will be no restrictions on date of publication, geographical location, study setting, or language of publication. The primary outcome is rate of recurrence/relapse. The assessments of randomised controlled trials will be performed using the risk of bias tool from the Cochrane Collaboration. Non-randomised studies will be assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The quality of evidence will be assessed using the Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations (Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) guidelines.Ethics and disseminationNo formal ethical approval is required as all data collected will be secondary data and analysed anonymously. Results will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and at scientific events.Prospero registration numberCRD42020164822.
| S-EPMC8883264 | biostudies-literature
Project description:•We present two cases of postmolar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN).•Both cases presented with lung metastases after hydatidiform mole.•Both cases showed spontaneous regression without treatment.•The mechanism behind this phenomenon remains unclear.•Patients with postmolar GTN and declining hCG values may not need chemotherapy.
| S-EPMC5537086 | biostudies-other
Project description:ObjectiveLittle observational data exist regarding the use of cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin (BEP) chemotherapy regimen in patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN).MethodsThis is a retrospective study of 95 patients with GTN in our center from June/2010 to June/2018. All patients received at least 2 cycles of BEP chemotherapy. The primary outcomes were the rate of complete remission (CR) and overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS), pregnancy rates after BEP exposure, drug resistance rate, and other adverse events.ResultsOf the 95 patients included, 66 (69.5%) patients received BEP as primary treatment and 29 (30.5%) were Salvage chemotherapy. The median age at diagnosis was 37 years (range 29.75-46) and 34 years (range 27-40) in two groups, respectively. The median WHO prognostic scores were 6 (range 3.5-8), and 77.32% of patients were FIGO stage III-IV in the primary treatment group. The median WHO prognostic scores were 5 (range 3-9), and 66.55% of patients were FIGO stage III-IV in the salvage treatment group. Median cycles of BEP treatment were 4 (3, 5) and 3 (2, 4) in two groups, respectively. In the primary chemotherapy group, 18.2% received additional hysterectomy, 4.5% received UAE for vaginal bleeding, and 1.52% received whole-brain radiotherapy. In the salvage chemotherapy group, 20.7% received hysterectomy, 6.9% received lobectomy, 3.4% received hysteroscopic lesion resection, and 3.4% received whole-brain radiotherapy. CR rates to initial chemotherapy were 86.4%, including 87.9% in the primary chemotherapy group and 82.8% in the salvage chemotherapy group. No predictive factor of chemotherapy resistance was identified. The rate of 5 year-DFS was 96.52% (95% CI 86.78-99.12) in the primary chemotherapy group and 92.44% (95% CI 73.02-98.06) in the salvage chemotherapy group. The rate of 5 year-OS was 98.31% (95% CI 88.57-99.76) and 95.65% (95% CI 79.93-99.38) in the two groups, respectively. During the treatment, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and liver dysfunction occurred in 80.3%, 6.1%, 25.8%, and 50% primary chemotherapy patients and 82.8%, 31%, 10.3%, and 86.2% salvage chemotherapy patients. In patients with fertility requirements, live birth rates were 100% (10/10) in primary chemotherapy patients and 80% (4/5) in salvage chemotherapy patients.ConclusionsBEP regimen was effective in the treatment of GTINs. The treatment was well tolerated, with no safety concerns on patients' fertility.
| S-EPMC8249144 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveThe efficacy of the first-line monodrug chemotherapy has been generally established for low-risk GTN. Most patients can achieve a complete response after the first-line monodrug chemotherapy. However, which monodrug chemotherapy regimen is better for individual patients with GTN is not yet certain. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of first-line monodrug chemotherapy in low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN).MethodDatabases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, were searched from inception to November 1, 2022, for case-control studies on first-line monodrug chemotherapy in GTN. Network meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy outcome of six monodrug chemotherapy regimens in GTN, with a complete response rate as the endpoint.ResultTwenty-four studies were considered eligible, including 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 15 non-RCTs. A total of 3344 patients with low-risk GTN were involved. Six monodrug chemotherapy regimens were included and analyzed. In descending order of efficacy, these six regimens were VP-16 (5 days), ACT-D (5 days), MTX (5 days), ACT-D (1.25 mg/m2), MTX (8 days), and MTX (30-50 mg/m2) in all study, and five regimens were ACT-D (5 days), MTX (5 days), ACT-D (1.25 mg/m2), MTX (8 days), and MTX (30-50 mg/m2) in RCT.ConclusionAmong the six first-line monodrug chemotherapy regimens for low-risk GTN in all study, VP-16 (5 days) was the best in terms of efficacy. And five regimens in RCT, ACT-D was the best. However, the finding needs to be validated through more high-quality clinical studies.
| S-EPMC10796812 | biostudies-literature