Dataset Information

Hotspots 2.0: Toward an integrated understanding of stressors and response options.

ABSTRACT: Integrated and transdisciplinary approaches are necessary in hotspots research where the intention is to influence policy and practice. Knowing that climate change will impact major ecosystem services and the sustainability of life support systems, a critical examination of the hotspot concept and approach is undertaken to pursue synergistic responses. Hotspots 2.0 embodies current thinking about planning towards multiple drivers of change and seeing human and natural systems as mutually inter-dependent and benefiting from integrated policy approaches. Such proposed adaptation interventions to inter-related stressors will complement biodiversity conservation, disaster risk reduction, and human well-being. Through a systematic review, we assess 114 relevant peer review cases to examine integrative responses to climatic and non-climatic vulnerabilities in various hotspot regions. Furthermore, we illustrate the utility of the Hotspots 2.0 approach using emerging insights from the 'Collaborative Adaptation Research Initiative in Africa and Asia' in semi-arid regions, deltas, and glacier-fed river basin hotspots.

SUBMITTER: Khan AS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6486930 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Hotspots 2.0: Toward an integrated understanding of stressors and response options.

Khan Ahmed S AS Cundill Georgina G

Ambio 20181120 6

Integrated and transdisciplinary approaches are necessary in hotspots research where the intention is to influence policy and practice. Knowing that climate change will impact major ecosystem services and the sustainability of life support systems, a critical examination of the hotspot concept and approach is undertaken to pursue synergistic responses. Hotspots 2.0 embodies current thinking about planning towards multiple drivers of change and seeing human and natural systems as mutually inter-d ...[more]

PMID: 30460597

Similar Datasets

Project description:Early detection by screening significantly reduces mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC). However, CRC screening rates have plateaued, with a considerable segment of the population remaining unscreened. Not being up to date with screening was associated with an approximate 3-fold risk for CRC-related mortality. There are different well-established CRC screening modalities, including invasive and non-invasive, which detect both polyps and cancer or cancer alone. Colonoscopy remains the dominant screening modality in the U.S.; however, colonoscopy uptake is low due to the invasiveness, perception of discomfort and embarrassment, logistical challenges, cost, and potential risks. Increasing patient compliance and adherence to screening is critical to improving CRC outcomes. A key to enhancing screening participation is patient acceptance of the testing method. A blood-based screening test presents an opportunity to overcome some challenging barriers. Blood-based tests are non-invasive compared to colonoscopy and can easily be part of a standard medical office appointment for a wellness check or scheduled visits to manage chronic illnesses and be completed at the point of care. This study will examine patient preference to use a blood-based screening test and compliance with CRC screening recommendations after failing to complete the FIT (Fecal Immunochemical Test)/FOBT (Fecal Occult Blood Test) or colonoscopy order in six months. Compliance with CRC screening is particularly poor among medically underserved populations, and most of these vulnerable individuals use federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) to obtain care. Implementing a blood-based screening test at FQHCs has the potential to improve CRC screening uptake and adherence and improve health disparities in medically underserved populations. This study seeks to answer the following four questions: 1) What is the acceptability of a blood-based screening as an alternative for patients who failed to complete a prior order using traditional screening methods? 2) Are patients who failed to comply with traditional screening methods more likely to comply with a blood-based screening test? 3) What is the effect of offering a blood-based screening test for patients who are non-compliance with traditional screening methods on overall CRC screening rates? 4) What are the facilitators and barriers to implementing the blood-based screening test in clinical settings?

Project description:Rapid environmental changes impact the global distribution and abundance of species, highlighting the urgency to understand and predict how populations will respond. The analysis of differentially expressed genes has elucidated areas of the genome involved in adaptive divergence to past and present environmental change. Such studies however have been hampered by large numbers of differentially expressed genes and limited knowledge of how these genes work in conjunction with each other. Recent methods (broadly termed "pathway analyses") have emerged that aim to group genes that behave in a coordinated fashion to a factor of interest. These methods aid in functional annotation and uncovering biological pathways, thereby collapsing complex datasets into more manageable units, providing more nuanced understandings of both the organism-level effects of modified gene expression, and the targets of adaptive divergence. Here, we reanalyze a dataset that investigated temperature-induced changes in gene expression in marine-adapted and freshwater-adapted threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus), using Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) with PANTHER Gene Ontology (GO)-Slim overrepresentation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis. Six modules exhibited a conserved response and six a divergent response between marine and freshwater stickleback when acclimated to 7°C or 22°C. One divergent module showed freshwater-specific response to temperature, and the remaining divergent modules showed differences in height of reaction norms. PPARAa, a transcription factor that regulates fatty acid metabolism and has been implicated in adaptive divergence, was located in a module that had higher expression at 7°C and in freshwater stickleback. This updated methodology revealed patterns that were not found in the original publication. Although such methods hold promise toward predicting population response to environmental stressors, many limitations remain, particularly with regard to module expression representation, database resources, and cross-database integration.

Dataset Information

Hotspots 2.0: Toward an integrated understanding of stressors and response options.

Publications

Hotspots 2.0: Toward an integrated understanding of stressors and response options.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure