Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective/methods
We compared short-term outcomes following 40 traditional, cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to the first 40 cemented robotic-arm assisted TKA (raTKA) and analyzed the learning curve for raTKA.Results
LOS was longer for traditional TKA compared to raTKA (1.92 vs. 1.27days, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in surgical time between the second 20 raTKA and all traditional TKA cases (81.1 vs. 78.3 mins, p = 0.254). raTKA patients had improved 90-day ROM (+3.8° vs. -8.7°, p < 0.05) but comparable complications rates, Knee Society Scores, and patient-reported outcomes at all timepoints.Conclusion
Despite comparable outcomes, the learning curve for raTKA appeared to progress rapidly.
SUBMITTER: Naziri Q
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6487301 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jul-Aug
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Naziri Qais Q Cusson Barry C BC Chaudhri Moiuz M Shah Neil V NV Sastry Akhilesh A
Journal of orthopaedics 20190322 4
<h4>Objective/methods</h4>We compared short-term outcomes following 40 traditional, cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to the first 40 cemented robotic-arm assisted TKA (raTKA) and analyzed the learning curve for raTKA.<h4>Results</h4>LOS was longer for traditional TKA compared to raTKA (1.92 vs. 1.27days, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in surgical time between the second 20 raTKA and all traditional TKA cases (81.1 vs. 78.3 mins, p = 0.254). raTKA patients had improved 90-day ROM (+3. ...[more]