Dataset Information

Periprocedural management of anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation in direct oral anticoagulant-treated patients.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Guidelines recommend performing atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation without interruption of a direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and to administer unfractionated heparin (UFH) for an activated clotting time (ACT) ≥300 seconds, by analogy with vitamin K antagonist (VKA). Nevertheless, pharmacological differences between DOACs and VKA, especially regarding ACT sensitivity and UFH response, prevent extrapolation from VKA to DOACs.

Hypothesis

The level of anticoagulation at the time of the procedure in uninterrupted DOAC-treated patients is unpredictable and would complicate intraprocedural UFH administration and monitoring.

Methods

This prospective study included interrupted DOAC-treated patients requiring AF ablation. Preprocedural DOAC concentration ([DOAC]), intraprocedural UFH administration, and ACT values were recorded. A cohort of DOAC-treated patients requiring flutter catheter ablation was considered to illustrate [DOAC] without DOAC interruption.

Results

Forty-eight patients underwent AF and 14 patients underwent flutter ablation, respectively. In uninterrupted DOAC-treated patients, [DOAC] ranged from ≤30 to 466 ng/mL. When DOAC were interrupted, from 54 to 218 hours, [DOAC] were minimal (maximum: 36 ng/mL), preventing DOAC-ACT interference. Anyway, ACT values were poorly correlated with UFH doses (R ² = 0.2256).

Conclusions

Our data showed that uninterrupted DOAC therapy resulted in an unpredictable and highly variable initial level of anticoagulation before catheter ablation. Moreover, even with DOAC interruption preventing interference between DOAC, UFH, and ACT, intraprocedural UFH monitoring was complex. Altogether, our exploratory results call into question the appropriateness of transposing UFH dose protocols, as well as the relevance of ACT monitoring in uninterrupted DOAC-treated patients.

SUBMITTER: Martin AC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6489798 | biostudies-literature | 2018 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Periprocedural management of anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation in direct oral anticoagulant-treated patients.

Martin Anne-Céline AC Lessire Sarah S Leblanc Isabelle I Dincq Anne-Sophie AS Philip Ivan I Gouin-Thibault Isabelle I Godier Anne A

Clinical cardiology 20180510 5

<h4>Background</h4>Guidelines recommend performing atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation without interruption of a direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and to administer unfractionated heparin (UFH) for an activated clotting time (ACT) ≥300 seconds, by analogy with vitamin K antagonist (VKA). Nevertheless, pharmacological differences between DOACs and VKA, especially regarding ACT sensitivity and UFH response, prevent extrapolation from VKA to DOACs.<h4>Hypothesis</h4>The level of anticoagula ...[more]

PMID: 29532536

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and aimsFew recent large-scale studies have evaluated the risks and benefits of continuing oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy after catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). This study evaluated the status of continuation of OAC therapy and the association between continuation of OAC therapy and thromboembolic and bleeding events according to the CHADS2 score.MethodsThis retrospective study included data from the Japanese nationwide administrative claims database of patients who underwent CA for AF between April 2014 and March 2021. Patients without AF recurrence assessed by administrative data of the treatment modalities were divided into two groups according to continuation of OAC therapy 6 months after the index CA. The primary outcomes were thromboembolism and major bleeding after a landmark period of 6 months. After inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis, the association between OAC continuation and outcomes was determined according to the CHADS2 score.ResultsAmong 231 374 patients included, 69.7%, 21.6%, and 8.7% had CHADS2 scores of ≤1, 2, and ≥3, respectively. Of these, 71% continued OAC therapy at 6 months. The OAC continuation rate was higher in the high CHADS2 score group than that in the low CHADS2 score group. Among all patients, 2451 patients (0.55 per 100 person-years) had thromboembolism and 2367 (0.53 per 100 person-years) had major bleeding. In the CHADS2 score ≤1 group, the hazard ratio of the continued OAC group was 0.86 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74-1.01, P = .06] for thromboembolism and was 1.51 (95% CI: 1.27-1.80, P < .001) for major bleeding. In the CHADS2 score ≥3 group, the hazard ratio of the continued OAC group was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.46-0.82, P = .001) for thromboembolism and was 1.05 (95% CI: 0.71-1.56, P = 0.81) for major bleeding.ConclusionsThis observational study suggests that the benefits and risks of continuing OAC therapy after CA for AF differ based on the patient's CHADS2 score. The risk of major bleeding due to OAC continuation seems to outweigh the risk reduction of thromboembolism in patients with lower thromboembolic risk.

Project description:BackgroundThe guidelines recommend anticoagulation management with uninterrupted warfarin or direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) during the atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation periprocedural period.ObjectivesTo clarify the Japanese real-world latest periprocedural anticoagulation management during AF ablation.MethodsThis multicenter observational study included 6232 consecutive AF patients (68.7 ± 10.9 years, 4346 men) who underwent periprocedural anticoagulation therapy using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) between January 2022 and August 2023.ResultsThe mean CHADS2 and CHA2DS2VASc scores were 1.2 ± 1.1 and 2.3 ± 1.5. Bleeding and thromboembolic events occurred in 79 (1.3%) and eight (0.12%) patients. During the periprocedural period, factor Xa inhibitors (FXaIs) were used in 3063 patients (rivaroxaban in 624, apixaban in 1093, and edoxaban in 1345) and DTIs in 3170 including 2583 in whom DTIs were switched from FXaIs. Both the bleeding (0.85% vs. 1.69%, p = .003) and thromboembolic event rates (0.03% vs. 0.23%, p = .036) were significantly lower in the DTI- than FXaI-group. A multivariate analysis showed periprocedural FXaI use was significantly associated with both bleeding events (odds ratio [OR] = 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20-3.08, p = .006) and cardiac tamponade (OR = 2.74, 95% CI = 1.27-5.9, p = .01). The interval between the last DOAC administration and the procedure was significantly shorter in the DTI- than FXaI-group (4.2 ± 4.9 vs. 19.3 ± 10.7 h, p < .01). In the FXaI-group, the bleeding rate tended to be lower in the minimally interrupted (n = 2105) than uninterrupted group (n = 821) (1.47% vs. 2.56%, p = .06). Two patients in the uninterrupted FXaI-group required surgical management for cardiac tamponade.ConclusionsOur multicenter real-world data demonstrated that anticoagulation with DTIs was a reasonable periprocedural anticoagulation regimen to reduce periprocedural complications.

Project description:AimsIn patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are as effective and safe as the vitamin K antagonist (VKA) warfarin. Phenprocoumon has a different pharmacokinetic profile compared with warfarin and is the most used VKA in Germany. The aim of the study was to compare DOAC with phenprocoumon.Methods and resultsIn this retrospective single-centre cohort study, 1735 patients who underwent 2219 consecutive catheter ablations for AF between January 2011 and May 2017 were included. All patients were in-hospital for at least 48 h after catheter ablation. The primary outcome was defined as peri-procedural thrombo-embolic events. The secondary outcome was any bleeding according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). The mean age of the patients was 63.3 years. Phenprocoumon was prescribed in 929 (42%) of the cases, and in 697 (31%) dabigatran, 399 (18%) rivaroxaban, and 194 (9%) apixaban. During hospitalization, 37 (1.6%) thrombo-embolic events occurred, including 23 transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs). Compared with the use of phenoprocoumon, the use of DOAC was significantly associated with a lower thrombo-embolic risk [16 (1.2%) vs. 21 (2.2%), odds ratio (OR)], 0.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2-0.9], P = 0.04. No statistically significant association with bleeding risk was observed [phenprocomoun: 122 (13%); DOAC: 163 (12.6%); OR 0.9 (95% CI 0.7-1.2); P = 0.70]. Interruption of oral anticoagulation (OAC) was associated with an increased risk for thrombo-embolic complications [OR 2.2 (1.1-4.3); P = 0.031], and bleeding [OR 2.5 (95% CI 1.8-3.2), P = 0.001].ConclusionIn patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF, the use of DOAC was associated with a reduced risk of thrombo-embolic events compared with phenprocoumon. Non-interrupted oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy was associated with a reduced risk of peri-procedural thrombo-embolic and any bleeding complications.

Dataset Information

Periprocedural management of anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation in direct oral anticoagulant-treated patients.

Background

Hypothesis

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Periprocedural management of anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation in direct oral anticoagulant-treated patients.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets