Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

0 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

New inversion method: endoscopic submucosal dissection of a neoplasm extending into a colonic diverticulum.

ABSTRACT:

SUBMITTER: Arimoto J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6492311 | biostudies-literature | 2019 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Publications

New inversion method: endoscopic submucosal dissection of a neoplasm extending into a colonic diverticulum.

Arimoto Jun J Chiba Hideyuki H Tachikawa Jun J Goto Tohru T Nakajima Atsushi A

VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 20190312 5

PMID: 31061946

Similar Datasets

Endoscopic submucosal dissection with the combination of a scissor-type knife and novel traction method for colonic neoplasm involving a diverticulum

Project description:Video Video 1 A 35-mm laterally spreading tumor partially infiltrated the interior portion of the diverticular orifice in the ascending colon. Glycerol and hyaluronate solution were injected into the submucosa to maintain adequate mucosal elevation. Mucosal incision and submucosal dissection were performed using a DualKnife and insulation-tipped knife from the anal side; however, safe submucosal dissection was challenging with these knives because of severe fibrosis and abundant blood vessels in the diverticulum. Therefore, to improve the visibility of the submucosa, a scissor-type knife and a multiloop traction device was used to facilitate the submucosal dissection. Finally, en bloc resection was achieved in 117 minutes without adverse events. A part of the diverticular defect after endoscopic submucosal dissection was clipped to prevent delayed perforation.

| S-EPMC9832220 | biostudies-literature

Traction-assisted colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection by use of clip and line for a neoplasm involving colonic diverticulum.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC6003900 | biostudies-literature

Successful endoscopic submucosal dissection for a tumor located completely within a colonic diverticulum after inversion of the diverticulum using a traction device.

Project description:Video 1Successful endoscopic submucosal dissection for a tumor completely located within a colonic diverticulum after inversion of the diverticulum using a traction device. After reconfirming that the diverticulum could be inverted into the lumen with forceps, the first endoclip grasping a ring-thread made of dental floss was fixed on the mucosa in the diverticulum. Immediately afterward, a second endoclip was used to grasp the ring-thread and fix it to the opposite colonic wall. By insufflating with air, the lesion within the inverted diverticulum was pulled out of the diverticulum into the colonic lumen, establishing a good field of view for dissection. After local injection of hyaluronic acid, a circumferential incision and dissection were performed using a DualKnife, and the lesion was promptly removed en bloc. The wound was completely closed with endoclips, along with the diverticulum. The total procedure time was 10 minutes, and there were no adverse events.

| S-EPMC8645970 | biostudies-literature

Feasibility and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for lesions in proximity to a colonic diverticulum.

Project description:Background/aimsEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for diverticulum-associated colorectal lesions is generally contraindicated because of the high risk of perforation. Several studies on patients with such lesions treated with ESD have been reported recently. However, the feasibility and safety of ESD for lesions in proximity to a colonic diverticulum (D-ESD) have not been fully clarified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of D-ESD.MethodsD-ESD was defined as ESD for lesions within approximately 3 mm of a diverticulum. Twenty-six consecutive patients who underwent D-ESD were included. Two strategic approaches were used depending on whether submucosal dissection of the diverticulum-related part was required (strategy B) or not (strategy A). Treatment outcomes and adverse events associated with each strategy were analyzed.ResultsThe en bloc resection rate was 96.2%. The rates of R0 and curative resection in strategies A and B were 80.8%, 73.1%, 84.6%, and 70.6%, respectively. Two cases of intraoperative perforation and one case of delayed perforation occurred. The delayed perforation case required emergency surgery, but the other cases were managed conservatively.ConclusionD-ESD may be a feasible treatment option. However, it should be performed in a high-volume center by expert hands because it requires highly skilled endoscopic techniques.

| S-EPMC9178129 | biostudies-literature

Colonic tumor in a diverticulum removed by endoscopic submucosal dissection: Two-step strategy using multi-loop traction devices.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC9544435 | biostudies-literature

Magnetic anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection for colonic tumor.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC5990668 | biostudies-literature

Star-Loop: a novel, low-cost method of multipoint traction for colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC11551485 | biostudies-literature

Pulley traction-assisted colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection affords good visibility of submucosal layer.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC6206323 | biostudies-literature

Bridge formation method in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Project description: Not available

| S-EPMC10099846 | biostudies-literature

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for proximal colonic lesions: An effective therapeutic option.

Project description:Background and study aimsDue to the greater risks of adverse events (AEs) and the lower rate of submucosal invasive cancer (SMIC), large proximal colonic polyps are frequently treated by piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in the West. However, this implies the risk of surgery to radicalize non-curative endoscopic resection in case of early colorectal cancer (CRC). We evaluated procedure outcomes in patients undergoing ESD for proximal colonic lesions at risk of SMIC.Patients and methodsAll consecutive patients with lesions at risk of SMIC proximal to splenic flexure referred for ESD at a tertiary center were prospectively included from 2019 to 2021. En bloc, R0, and curative resection rates were primary outcomes, while length of hospitalization, AEs, need for surgery due to AEs, and recurrence rates were secondary outcomes.ResultsA total of 116 patients (mean age: 68.4±10.91 years; men: 69.8%) were included. En bloc, R0, and curative resection rates were 84.5%, 78.4%, and 72.4%, respectively. T1 adenocarcinoma was reported in 25% of lesions (29/116). Eleven patients (9.5%) underwent secondary surgery due to non-curative resections; residual disease was found in one patient. Most frequent AE was intra-procedural perforation (9.9%); no AE required surgery. Median follow-up was 36 months; three of 97 recurrences (3.1%) at 6 months and one of 85 recurrence (1.2%) at 36 months were reported, which were all endoscopically treated.ConclusionsIn expert hands, ESD is effective and safe for proximal colonic lesions at risk of SMIC for the favorable balance between risk of AEs and benefit of avoiding unnecessary surgery, even for early CRC.

| S-EPMC11922310 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data