Dataset Information

Spinal Cord Stimulation and Augmentative Control Strategies for Leg Movement after Spinal Paralysis in Humans.

ABSTRACT: Severe spinal cord injury is a devastating condition, tearing apart long white matter tracts and causing paralysis and disability of body functions below the lesion. But caudal to most injuries, the majority of neurons forming the distributed propriospinal system, the localized gray matter spinal interneuronal circuitry, and spinal motoneuron populations are spared. Epidural spinal cord stimulation can gain access to this neural circuitry. This review focuses on the capability of the human lumbar spinal cord to generate stereotyped motor output underlying standing and stepping, as well as full weight-bearing standing and rhythmic muscle activation during assisted treadmill stepping in paralyzed individuals in response to spinal cord stimulation. By enhancing the excitability state of the spinal circuitry, the stimulation can have an enabling effect upon otherwise "silent" translesional volitional motor control. Strategies for achieving functional movement in patients with severe injuries based on minimal translesional intentional control, task-specific proprioceptive feedback, and next-generation spinal cord stimulation systems will be reviewed. The role of spinal cord stimulation can go well beyond the immediate generation of motor output. With recently developed training paradigms, it can become a major rehabilitation approach in spinal cord injury for augmenting and steering trans- and sublesional plasticity for lasting therapeutic benefits.

SUBMITTER: Minassian K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6492830 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Spinal Cord Stimulation and Augmentative Control Strategies for Leg Movement after Spinal Paralysis in Humans.

Minassian Karen K Hofstoetter Ursula S US

CNS neuroscience & therapeutics 20160218 4

Severe spinal cord injury is a devastating condition, tearing apart long white matter tracts and causing paralysis and disability of body functions below the lesion. But caudal to most injuries, the majority of neurons forming the distributed propriospinal system, the localized gray matter spinal interneuronal circuitry, and spinal motoneuron populations are spared. Epidural spinal cord stimulation can gain access to this neural circuitry. This review focuses on the capability of the human lumba ...[more]

PMID: 26890324

Similar Datasets

Project description:Coupling between cervical and lumbar spinal networks (cervico-lumbar coupling) is vital during human locomotion. Impaired cervico-lumbar coupling after neural injuries or diseases can be reengaged via simultaneous arm and leg cycling training. Sensorimotor circuitry including cervico-lumbar coupling may further be enhanced by non-invasive modulation of spinal circuity using transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS). This project aimed to determine the effect of cervical, lumbar, or combined tSCS on spinal reflex (Hoffmann [H-]) and corticospinal (motor evoked potential [MEP]) excitability during a static or cycling cervico-lumbar coupling task. Fourteen neurologically intact study participants were seated in a recumbent leg cycling system. H-reflex and MEP amplitudes were assessed in the left flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscle during two tasks (Static and Cycling) and four conditions: (1) No tSCS, (2) tSCS applied to the cervical enlargement (Cervical); (3) tSCS applied to the lumbar enlargement (Lumbar); (4) simultaneous cervical and lumbar tSCS (Combined). While cervical tSCS did not alter FCR H-reflex amplitude relative to No tSCS, lumbar tSCS significantly facilitated H-reflex amplitude by 11.1%, and combined cervical and lumbar tSCS significantly enhanced the facilitation to 19.6%. Neither cervical nor lumbar tSCS altered MEP amplitude alone (+4.9 and 1.8% relative to legs static, No tSCS); however, combined tSCS significantly increased MEP amplitude by 19.7% compared to No tSCS. Leg cycling alone significantly suppressed the FCR H-reflex relative to static, No tSCS by 13.6%, while facilitating MEP amplitude by 18.6%. When combined with leg cycling, tSCS was unable to alter excitability for any condition. This indicates that in neurologically intact individuals where interlimb coordination and corticospinal tract are intact, the effect of leg cycling on cervico-lumbar coupling and corticospinal drive was not impacted significantly with the tSCS intensity used. This study demonstrates, for the first time, that tonic activation of spinal cord networks through multiple sites of tSCS provides a facilitation of both spinal reflex and corticospinal pathways. It remains vital to determine if combined tSCS can influence interlimb coupling after neural injury or disease when cervico-lumbar connectivity is impaired.

Dataset Information

Spinal Cord Stimulation and Augmentative Control Strategies for Leg Movement after Spinal Paralysis in Humans.

Publications

Spinal Cord Stimulation and Augmentative Control Strategies for Leg Movement after Spinal Paralysis in Humans.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets