Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy or immunotherapy for first?line treatment of advanced non?small cell lung cancer: a generic protocol
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Syn N
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6494557 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Apr
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundImmune-checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy are emerging as effective first-line treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), but little is known about the magnitude of benefits and potential clinical predictors.MethodsWe performed a meta-analysis of randomized trials that compared PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy in first line of treatment for advanced NSCLC. The outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and treatment-related adverse events (AEs). A fixed-effect or random-effects model was adopted depending on between-study heterogeneity.ResultsSix trials involving 3144 patients were included. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy was significantly associated with improvement of PFS (hazards ratio [HR], 0.62; 95% CI 0.57-0.67; P < .001), OS (HR, 0.68; 95% CI 0.53-0.87; P = .002) and ORR (relative ratio [RR], 1.56; 95% CI 1.29-1.89; P < .001), irrespective of PD-L1 expression level. The significant predictor(s) for treatment benefit with combination therapy versus chemotherapy alone were PD-L1 expression level for PFS (P < .001); types of checkpoint inhibitor for ORR (P < .001); histology (P = .025), age (P = .038), gender (P < .001), and types of checkpoint inhibitor (P < .001) for OS. In safety analyses, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy had significantly higher incidence of adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or higher (RR, 1.14; P = .007), AEs leading to treatment discontinuation (RR, 1.29; P = .022), serious AEs (RR 1.70; P = .006), immune mediated AEs of any grade (RR, 2.37; P < .001), and immune mediated AEs of grade 3 or higher (RR, 3.71; P < .001).ConclusionsPD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy, compared with chemotherapy, is associated with significantly improved PFS, ORR, and OS in first-line therapy in NSCLC, at the expense of increased treatment-related AEs.
| S-EPMC6303974 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThis study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab plus chemotherapy (NC) or ipilimumab versus chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in the United States and China.MethodsA partitioned survival model was constructed from the perspective of the US third-party payers and Chinese healthcare system. Health states and transition probabilities were modeled based on the survival data from the CheckMate-648 clinical trial (NCT03143153). The time horizon for the model was 10 years. Only direct medical costs were considered. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the results.ResultsIn the United States, nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NI) led to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $155,159.82/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and $104,297.07/QALY gained in the overall population and in patients with tumor cell programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of ⩾1% (subgroup), respectively. The ICER for the subgroup was between the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold values of $100,000/QALY and $150,000/QALY, and the other case was higher than $150,000/QALY. NC led to an ICER of $518,062.85/QALY and $193,169.49/QALY gained in the overall population and the subgroup, respectively. Both ICERs were significantly higher than the WTP threshold of $150,000/QALY. In China, the ICERs for patients treated with the addition of nivolumab were >$90,000/QALY in all cases, significantly exceeding the WTP threshold of $37,654/QALY.ConclusionsNI is more cost-effective than NC or chemotherapy alone for treating advanced ESCC with PD-L1 expression ⩾1% in the United States. Chemotherapy alone is the only cost-effective option in China.
| S-EPMC9486256 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Chemotherapy in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) or bevacizumab has demonstrated a superior effect for non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC). There are still few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the differences between ICI plus chemotherapy (ICI-chemotherapy) and bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (Bev-chemotherapy) in first-line treatment of NS-NSCLC. We identified RCTs in databases and conference abstracts presented at international conferences by Sep 1, 2021. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using randomized effect consistency model to estimate hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR). The outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), and grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Fifteen RCTs (17 articles) of 6561 advanced NS-NSCLC patients receiving ICI-chemotherapy, Bev-chemotherapy, or chemotherapy at first-line were eligible for analysis. NMA results showed that first-line ICI-chemotherapy prolonged OS (HR 0.79, 0.66-0.94) in patients with advanced NS-NSCLC compared with Bev-chemotherapy, while no differences were in PFS, ORR, and grade ≥ 3 TRAEs (p > 0.05). Ranking plots suggested that ICI-chemotherapy had the most probability to offer the best OS (probability 0.993), PFS (probability 0.658), and ORR (probability 0.565), and Bev-chemotherapy had the most risks of grade ≥ 3 TRAEs (probability 0.833). Therefore, our findings showed that first-line ICI-chemotherapy was associated with better OS than Bev-chemotherapy in patients with advanced NS-NSCLC, and more clinical trials are warranted to confirm these results.
| S-EPMC9119358 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In BRAF wild type advanced melanoma, immune checkpoint blockers such as anti-PD1 (anti-programmed cell death 1) are usually continued beyond progression for a hypothetical rare further response. Chemotherapy as a second-line option is considered ineffective by many practitioners based on historical data. Continuing anti-PD1 beyond progression has a high health-economic impact and is not recommended by the FDA. This study aimed to describe the efficacy and survival of advanced melanoma patients who received second-line (or more) chemotherapy after immunotherapy failure.This was a retrospective single center study conducted in a French University Hospital during an 11-month period. All advanced melanoma patients treated with chemotherapy after immunotherapy failure were included.Eighteen patients were analyzed. Therapeutic response to chemotherapy was evaluable in 16 patients: partial response was achieved in 3/16 (19%), stable disease in 1/16 (6%) and progressive disease in 12/16 (75%). Median overall survival from chemotherapy start was 12 months. Median progression-free survival was 5.4 months. The 6-month overall survival rate was 81% and the 6-month progression-free survival rate was 40%.Although the disease control rate with chemotherapy was low (25%), survival data in our study are far superior to those previously published. This could be linked to a high proportion of patients treated with anti-PD1 just prior to chemotherapy, which may suggest a potential synergy between immunotherapy and chemotherapy.
| S-EPMC7373626 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionPlatin-based chemotherapy (CT) has long been the first-line standard-of-care for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Adding immune-checkpoint inhibitor(s) to CT (ICI+CT) in this setting is an option of interest, although its benefit is apparently modest.MethodsThis meta-analysis was conducted on randomized trials comparing first-line ICI+CT versus CT alone for ES-SCLC. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), response at 12 months and adverse events (AEs). Subgroup analyses were computed according to the immunotherapy used, performance status (PS), age, platinum salt, liver metastases and brain metastases at diagnosis.ResultsThe literature search identified one randomized phase II (ECOG-ACRIN-5161) and four phase III trials (CASPIAN, IMPOWER-133, KEYNOTE-604 and Reck et al. 2016) that included 2775 patients (66% males, 95% smokers, median age: 64 years, PS = 0 or 1). ICI+CT was significantly associated (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) with prolonged OS [0.82 (0.75-0.89); p < 0.00001] and PFS [0.81 (0.75-0.87); p < 0.00001], with OS benefits for anti-PD-L1 [0.73 (0.63-0.85); p < 0.0001] or anti-PD-1 [0.76 (0.63-0.93); p < 0.006] but not for anti-CTLA-4 [0.90 (0.80-1.01), p = 0.07]. ORRs for ICI+CT or CT alone were comparable [odds ratio 1.12 (0.97-1.00); p = 0.12], but responses at 12 months favored ICI+CT [4.16 (2.81-6.17), p < 0.00001]. Serious grade-3/4 AEs were more frequent with ICI+CT [odds ratio 1.18 (1.02-1.37); p = 0.03]. Compared with CT, no ICI+CT benefit was found for ES-SCLC with brain metastases at diagnosis [HR 1.14 (0.87-1.50); p = 0.34].ConclusionsFirst-line ICI+CT appears to be superior to CT alone for ES-SCLC except for patients with brain metastases at diagnosis.
| S-EPMC7731693 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly used as first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring no actionable mutations; however, data on their efficacy among patients presenting with intracranial lesions are limited. This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of ICIs combined with chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients with measurable brain metastasis at initial diagnosis.MethodsOur study retrospectively analyzed clinical data of a total of 211 patients diagnosed with driver gene mutation-negative advanced NSCLC with measurable, asymptomatic brain metastasis at baseline from Hunan Cancer Hospital between January 1, 2019 and September 30, 2021. The patients were stratified into two groups according to the first-line treatment regimen received: ICI combined with chemotherapy ( n = 102) or chemotherapy ( n = 109). Systemic and intracranial objective response rates (ORRs) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. Adverse events were also compared between the groups.ResultsCompared with the chemotherapy-based regimen, the ICI-containing regimen was associated with a significantly higher intracranial (44.1% [45/102] vs . 28.4% [31/109], χ2 = 5.620, P = 0.013) and systemic (49.0% [50/102] vs . 33.9% [37/109], χ2 = 4.942, P = 0.019) ORRs and longer intracranial (11.0 months vs . 7.0 months, P <0.001) and systemic (9.0 months vs . 5.0 months, P <0.001) PFS. Multivariable analysis consistently revealed an independent association between receiving ICI plus platinum-based chemotherapy as a first-line regimen and prolonged intracranial PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-0.73, P <0.001) and systemic PFS (HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.35-0.66, P <0.001). No unexpected serious adverse effects were observed.ConclusionOur study provides real-world clinical evidence that ICI combined with chemotherapy is a promising first-line treatment option for driver gene mutation-negative advanced NSCLC patients who present with brain metastasis at initial diagnosis.Clinical trial registrationhttps://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ , OMESIA, NCT05129202.
| S-EPMC10278740 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesUse of immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line treatment for advanced (stage IIIB/IV) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. Clinical trials comparing single-drug immunotherapy (IO) with immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (IC) are lacking. We aimed to compare the efficacy of IO alone with that of IC as first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC.DesignSystematic review.Data sourcesPubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase for related studies on NSCLC; ClinicalTrials.gov, American Society of Clinical Oncology Meeting Library and World Conference on Lung Cancer for relevant conference abstracts (to July 2019).Eligibility criteriaArticles meeting the following criteria were selected: (1) randomised controlled trials on NSCLC treatment, (2) all individuals in the studies had not received treatment previously and (3) research on IO monotherapy using programmed death-1/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors or IC.Data extraction and synthesisAfter reading the original literature, two reviewers independently extracted the relevant information. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR). We also extracted data on treatment-related adverse events and immune-related adverse events (irAEs).ResultsOverall, 10 randomised controlled clinical trials (n=5765) were included. As first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC, IC tended to yield better PFS, OS and ORR than did IO. Furthermore, IC yielded significantly better PFS than IO when tumour PD-L1 expression was at least 50% (HR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.18 to 2.78) and yielded a better OS and PFS when tumour PD-L1 expression was at least 1%; IO resulted in fewer adverse events than did IC. However, the incidence of irAEs was higher for IO than for IC.ConclusionsThe findings of the indirect comparison indicate that IC as first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC is significantly more effective than IO in patients with PD-L1 expression in at least 50% of tumour cells.Trial registration numberCRD 42018116589.
| S-EPMC7682470 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe therapeutic landscape for advanced urothelial carcinoma (mUC) has changed significantly since studies establishing superiority of cisplatin as first-line therapy were conducted. Most patients who are eligible now receive either maintenance or second-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and data comparing first-line platinum chemotherapy agents in this setting is limited.Patients and methodsThe objective of this study was to determine the impact of first-line platinum chemotherapy agent on survival for patients who receive second-line ICI. This is a retrospective cohort study of real-world data, performed from January 1, 2015, to March 21, 2021, included patients with a diagnosis of metastatic or locally advanced urothelial carcinoma. Exposure of interest was first-line platinum-doublet chemotherapy (gemcitabine and/or cisplatin or gemcitabine and/or carboplatin) followed by single-agent second-line ICI. The primary endpoint was overall survival from start of second-line therapy.Results2,042 patients received either gemcitabine and cisplatin (gem/cis) or gemcitabine and carboplatin (gem/carbo) as first-line therapy. The primary analysis of 890 patients who received second-line single-agent ICI had a median follow-up was 24.2 months from initiation of second-line therapy. Important differences in baseline demographics and/or clinical factors between groups were age, performance status, incidence of upper tract disease, and cisplatin eligibility. Unadjusted overall survival (OS) calculated from start of second-line therapy was longer in patients who received gem/cis compared to gem/carbo followed by ICI (median 9.3 vs. 8.8 months, P = 0.0009). However, OS adjusted for covariates was not significantly different with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.79-1.13; P = 0.50). A separate time-varying covariate model also showed no association between OS and first-line gem/cis (HR 1.00 [95% CI, 0.84-1.19]) while receiving second-line ICI.ConclusionsSurvival time on ICI in the second-line setting is the same regardless of choice of prior platinum agent (cisplatin vs. carboplatin) suggesting against specific synergy for one of these agents with ICI. However, a significantly greater proportion of patients in a landmark analysis had long-term benefit with cisplatin strongly supporting it is as the preferred first-line platinum agent.
| S-EPMC9529860 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPancreatic cancer is mostly diagnosed in an advanced stage and treated with systemic therapy with palliative intent. Nowadays, the doublet chemotherapy of Gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (Gem-Nab) is one of the most frequently used regimens worldwide, but is not ubiquitarily available or reimbursed. Therefore, we compared the clinical efficacy of Gem-Nab to a historical control of patients treated with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (Gem-Ox) at our tertiary cancer center, which was the standard treatment prior to the introduction of FOLFIRINOX.MethodsThis single-center retrospective real world study includes 121 patients diagnosed with locally advanced or primary metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma who were treated with chemotherapy doublet, with either Gem-Nab or Gem-Ox in palliative first-line. Survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparisons were made with log-rank tests. Gem-Ox was considered as standard first line therapy at our institution for patients who were deemed fit for doublet chemotherapy between the years 2006 to 2012. These patients were compared to a cohort of patients treated with the new standard first-line therapy of Gem-Nab between 2013 and 2020.ResultsA total of 554 patients with pancreatic cancer of all stages were screened, and 73 patients treated with Gem-Nab and 48 patients treated with Gem-Ox in the palliative first-line setting were identified and included in this analysis. Patients receiving Gem-Ox had a statistically significantly better performance score (ECOG PS) when compared to the Gem-Nab group (Odds ratio (OR) 0.28, 95% CI 0.12-0.65, p = 0.005), more often suffered from locally advanced than metastatic disease (OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.27-7.91, p = 0.019) and were younger in age (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99, p = 0.013). Median overall survival (OS) of the whole study cohort was 10.3 months (95% CI 8.5-11.6). No statistically significant difference in OS could be observed between the Gem-Nab and the Gem-Ox cohort (median OS: 8.9 months (95% CI 6.4-13.5) versus 10.9 months (95% CI 9.5-13.87, p = 0.794, HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.85-1.91)). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.8 months in the entire cohort (95% CI 4.9-8.4). No statistically significant difference in PFS could be observed between the Gem-Nab and the Gem-Ox cohort (median PFS: 5.8 months (95% CI 4.3-8.2) versus 7.9 months (95% CI 5.4-9.5) p = 0.536, HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.74-1.67). Zero-truncated negative binomial regressions on OS and PFS adjusting for gender, age, performance status (ECOG PS), and CA19-9 levels yielded no significant difference between Gem-Nab or Gem-Ox.ConclusionFrom our analysis, we could evidence no difference in outcome parameters in this retrospective analysis despite the worse prognostic pattern for GemOX. Therefore, we suggest Gem-Ox as potential first line treatment option for inoperable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, especially if Gem-Nab is not available.
| S-EPMC10501299 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo compare the relative efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or chemotherapy (CT) alone, or their combination modality in the first-line treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsThis meta-analysis was performed on the eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) after searching web databases and meeting abstracts. The main research endpoints were the comparisons of median overall survival (mOS), the OS rate of 6 months (OSR6m), 1 year (OSR1y) and 2 years (OSR2y), median progression-free survival (mPFS), the PFS rate of 6 months (PFSR6m) and 1-year (PFSR1y), objective response rates (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).ResultsEleven RCTs comprising 6278 cases were included. In the subgroup of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) ?50%, compared with chemotherapy, the ICIs showed similar OSR6m (P > 0.05), but significantly improved efficacy in mOS, OSR1y, OSR2y, and ORR (all P < 0.05), also had less grade ? 3 TRAEs. Compared with pembrolizumab alone, pembrolizumab plus CT in the subgroup of PD-L1 ? 50% had similar mOS, OSR6m, OSR1y, and PFSR1y (all P > 0.05), but significantly improved mPFS, PFSR6m, and ORR (all P < 0.05 for interaction). Compared with the CT group, ICIs plus CT group with PD-L1 ? 50% or <1% showed significant benefit in OS, PFS, and ORR (all P < 0.05). However, in the ICIs plus CT group with 1% ? PD-L1 ? 49%, only PFS and ORR showed significant benefit compared with CT group (all P < 0.05), but not for results of OS.ConclusionsThe findings support the rationale for using pembrolizumab alone in the first-line treatment of PD-L1 ? 50% advanced NSCLC due to the similar OS and lower grade ? 3 TRAEs. However, the combination of ICIs and chemotherapy is strongly recommended in patients with PD-L1 ? 49% for significant survival benefit.
| S-EPMC6718602 | biostudies-literature