Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Good Studies Evaluate the Disease While Great Studies Evaluate the Patient: Development and Application of a Desirability of Outcome Ranking Endpoint for Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) is an innovative approach in clinical trials to evaluate the global benefits and risks of an intervention. We developed and validated a DOOR endpoint for Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (BSI) through a survey to infectious diseases clinicians and secondary analysis of trial data.

Methods

We administered a survey of 20 cases of S. aureus BSI, asking respondents to rank outcomes by global desirability. Correlations and percentage of pairwise agreement among rankings were estimated to inform development of a DOOR endpoint, which was applied to 2 prior S. aureus BSI trials. The probability that a patient randomly assigned to experimental treatment would have a better DOOR ranking than if assigned to control was estimated. Results were also analyzed using partial credit, which is analogous to scoring an academic test, assigning 100% to the most desirable outcome, 0% to the least, and "partial credit" to intermediate ranks.

Results

Forty-two recipients (97%) completed the survey. The DOOR endpoint fitting these rankings (r = 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.67 to 0.94) incorporated survival plus cumulative occurrence of adverse events, cure, infectious complications, and ongoing symptoms. Tailored versions of this endpoint were applied to 2 S. aureus BSI trials, and both demonstrated no benefit of the experimental treatment using DOOR and partial credit analysis.

Conclusions

Using S. aureus BSI as an exemplar, we developed a DOOR endpoint that can be used as a template for development of DOOR endpoints for other diseases. Future trials can incorporate DOOR to allow for global assessment of patient experience.

SUBMITTER: Doernberg SB 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6495020 | biostudies-literature | 2019 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Good Studies Evaluate the Disease While Great Studies Evaluate the Patient: Development and Application of a Desirability of Outcome Ranking Endpoint for Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection.

Doernberg Sarah B SB   Tran Thuy Tien Tram TTT   Tong Steven Y C SYC   Paul Mical M   Yahav Dafna D   Davis Joshua S JS   Leibovici Leonard L   Boucher Helen W HW   Corey G Ralph GR   Cosgrove Sara E SE   Chambers Henry F HF   Fowler Vance G VG   Evans Scott R SR   Holland Thomas L TL  

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 20190501 10


<h4>Background</h4>Desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) is an innovative approach in clinical trials to evaluate the global benefits and risks of an intervention. We developed and validated a DOOR endpoint for Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (BSI) through a survey to infectious diseases clinicians and secondary analysis of trial data.<h4>Methods</h4>We administered a survey of 20 cases of S. aureus BSI, asking respondents to rank outcomes by global desirability. Correlations and pe  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4671156 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4447452 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC4994353 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4534639 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7324170 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6376080 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8104220 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6557488 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9125302 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5850567 | biostudies-literature