Dataset Information

A Systematic Screen Reveals a Diverse Collection of Medications That Induce Antifungal Resistance in Candida Species.

ABSTRACT: The increasing incidence of and high mortality rates associated with invasive fungal infections (IFIs) impose an enormous clinical, social, and economic burden on humankind. In addition to microbiological resistance to existing antifungal drugs, the large number of unexplained treatment failures is a serious concern. Due to the extremely limited therapeutic options available, it is critical to identify and understand the various causes of treatment failure if patient outcomes are to improve. In this study, we examined one potential source of treatment failure: antagonistic drug interactions. Using a simple screen, we systematically identified currently approved medications that undermine the antifungal activity of three major antifungal drugs-fluconazole, caspofungin, and amphotericin B-on four prevalent human fungal pathogens-Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis, and Candida tropicalis This revealed that a diverse collection of structurally distinct drugs exhibit antagonistic interactions with fluconazole. Several antagonistic agents selected for follow-up studies induce azole resistance through a mechanism that depends on Tac1p/Pdr1p zinc-cluster transcription factors, which activate the expression of drug efflux pumps belonging to the ABC-type transporter family. Few antagonistic interactions were identified with caspofungin or amphotericin B, possibly reflecting their cell surface mode of action that should not be affected by drug efflux mechanisms. Given that patients at greatest risk of IFIs usually receive a multitude of drugs to treat various underlying conditions, these studies suggest that chemically inducible azole resistance may be much more common and important than previously realized.

SUBMITTER: Butts A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6496105 | biostudies-literature | 2019 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A Systematic Screen Reveals a Diverse Collection of Medications That Induce Antifungal Resistance in <i>Candida</i> Species.

Butts Arielle A Reitler Parker P Nishimoto Andrew T AT DeJarnette Christian C Estredge Leanna R LR Peters Tracy L TL Veve Michael P MP Rogers P David PD Palmer Glen E GE

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy 20190425 5

The increasing incidence of and high mortality rates associated with invasive fungal infections (IFIs) impose an enormous clinical, social, and economic burden on humankind. In addition to microbiological resistance to existing antifungal drugs, the large number of unexplained treatment failures is a serious concern. Due to the extremely limited therapeutic options available, it is critical to identify and understand the various causes of treatment failure if patient outcomes are to improve. In ...[more]

PMID: 30858206

Similar Datasets

Project description:Candida lusitaniae is usually susceptible to echinocandins. Beta-1,3-glucan synthase encoded by FKS genes is the target of echinocandins. A few missense mutations in the C. lusitaniae FKS1 hot spot 1 (HS1) have been reported. We report here the rapid emergence of antifungal resistance in C. lusitaniae isolated during therapy with amphotericin B (AMB), caspofungin (CAS), and azoles for treatment of persistent candidemia in an immunocompromised child with severe enterocolitis and visceral adenoviral disease. As documented from restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, the five C. lusitaniae isolates examined were related to each other. From antifungal susceptibility and molecular analyses, 5 different profiles (P) were obtained. These profiles included the following: profile 1 (P1) (CAS MIC [?g/ml], 0.5; fluconazole [FLC] MIC, 0.25), determined while the patient was being treated with liposomal AMB for 3 months; P2 (FLC MIC [?g/ml], 0.25; CAS MIC, 4), while the patient was being treated with CAS for 2 weeks; P3 (CAS MIC [?g/ml], 0.5; FLC MIC, 32), while the patient was being treated with azoles and CAS initially followed by azoles alone for a week; P4 (CAS MIC [?g/ml], 8; FLC MIC, 8), while the patient was being treated with both drugs for 3 weeks; and P5 (AMB MIC [?g/ml], 0.125; CAS MIC, 8), while the patient was being treated with AMB and FLC for 2 weeks. CAS resistance was associated with resistance not only to micafungin and anidulafungin but also to AMB. Analysis of CAS resistance revealed 3 novel FKS1 mutations in CAS-resistant isolates (S638Y in P2; S631Y in P4; S638P in P5). While S638Y and -P are within HS1, S631Y is in close proximity to this domain but was confirmed to confer candin resistance using a site-directed mutagenesis approach. FLC resistance could be linked with overexpression of major facilitator gene 7 (MFS7) in C. lusitaniae P2 and P4 and was associated with resistance to 5-flurocytosine. This clinical report describes resistance of C. lusitaniae to all common antifungals. While candins or azole resistance followed monotherapy, multidrug antifungal resistance emerged during combined therapy.

Project description:BackgroundThe incidence of candidemia is increasing in developing countries. Very little is known about the epidemiology of candidemia in Peru. The aim of this study is to describe the incidence, microbiology, clinical presentation and outcomes of Candida bloodstream infections in three Lima-Callao hospitals.MethodsCandida spp. isolates were identified prospectively at participant hospitals between November 2013 and January 2015. Susceptibility testing for amphotericin B, fluconazole, posaconazole, voriconazole and anidulafungin was performed using broth microdilution method. Clinical information was obtained from medical records and evaluated.ResultsWe collected information on 158 isolates and 157 patients. Median age of patients was 55.0 yrs., and 64.1% were males. Thirty-eight (24.2%) episodes of candidemia occurred in those <18 yrs. The frequency of non-Candida albicans was 72.1%. The most frequently recovered species were C. albicans (n = 44, 27.8%), C. parapsilosis (n = 40, 25.3%), C. tropicalis (n = 39, 24.7%) and C. glabrata (n = 15, 9.5%). Only four isolates were resistant to fluconazole, 86.7% (n = 137) were susceptible and 17 were susceptible-dose dependent. Decreased susceptibility to posaconazole was also observed in three isolates, and one to voriconazole. All isolates were susceptible to anidulafungin and amphotericin B. The most commonly associated co-morbid conditions were recent surgery (n = 61, 38.9%), mechanical ventilation (n = 60, 38.2%) and total parenteral nutrition (n = 57, 36.3%). The incidence of candidemia by center ranged between 1.01 and 2.63 cases per 1,000 admissions, with a global incidence of 2.04. Only 28.1% of cases received treatment within 72 hrs. of diagnosis. Overall, the 30-day survival was 60.4% (treated subjects, 67.4%; not-treated patients, 50.9%).ConclusionsWe found a very high proportion of non-albicans Candida species. Despite this, the decreased susceptibility/resistance to fluconazole was only 13.3% and not seen in the other antifungals. Overall, the incidence of candidemia mortality was high when compared to other international studies. It is possible, that the delay in initiating antifungal treatment contributed to the elevated mortality rate, in spite of low antifungal resistance.

Dataset Information

A Systematic Screen Reveals a Diverse Collection of Medications That Induce Antifungal Resistance in Candida Species.

Publications

A Systematic Screen Reveals a Diverse Collection of Medications That Induce Antifungal Resistance in <i>Candida</i> Species.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets