Dataset Information

The Prognostic and Clinical Value of CD44 in Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT: Background: CD44 is widely used as a putative cancer stem cells (CSCs) marker for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the prognostic role of CD44 in CRC remains controversial. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association of various CD44 isoforms and overall survival (OS) and clinicopathological features of CRC patients. Results: A total of 48 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Total CD44 isoforms overexpression was significantly correlated with worse OS of patients with CRC (HR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.08-1.61, P = 0.007). In a stratified analysis, a higher level of either CD44v6 or CD44v2 had an unfavorable impact on OS (HRCD44v6 = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.10-2.14, P = 0.010; HRCD44v2 = 2.93, 95% CI = 1.49-5.77, P = 0.002). Additionally, CD44 was shown to be associated with some clinicopathological features, such as lymph node metastasis (ORCD44 = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.01-2.41, P = 0.044; ORCD44v6 = 1.97, 95% CI = 1.19-3.26, P = 0.008; ORTotal CD44 isoforms = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.15-2.14, P = 0.004), distant metastasis (ORCD44 = 2.90, 95% CI = 1.08-7.83, P = 0.035; ORTotal CD44 isoforms = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.02-3.53, P = 0.044). Moreover, a high level of CD44 showed a possible correlation with poor differentiation (ORTotal CD44 isoforms = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.00-2.08, P = 0.051), elevated level of CD44v6 tend to be correlated with tumor size (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 0.99-2.96, P = 0.056). Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrated that CD44 overexpression might be an unfavorable prognostic factor for CRC patients and could be used to predict poor differentiation, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis.

SUBMITTER: Wang Z

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6503057 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Prognostic and Clinical Value of CD44 in Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Wang Zhenpeng Z Tang Yufei Y Xie Lei L Huang Aiping A Xue Chunchun C Gu Zhen Z Wang Kaiqiang K Zong Shaoqi S

Frontiers in oncology 20190430

Background: CD44 is widely used as a putative cancer stem cells (CSCs) marker for colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the prognostic role of CD44 in CRC remains controversial. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association of various CD44 isoforms and overall survival (OS) and clinicopathological features of CRC patients. Results: A total of 48 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Total CD44 isoforms overexpression was significan ...[more]

PMID: 31114754

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAccumulating evidence supports the overexpression of mucin 1 (MUC1) in colorectal cancer (CRC), but the value of elevated MUC1 expression remains controversial. Here, we evaluated the prognostic and clinicopathological value of MUC1 expression in CRC.Materials and methodsThe Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Wanfang databases, as well as the China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched for studies on MUC1 expression and prognosis of CRC through July 20, 2018. The pooled relative risks (RRs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to evaluate the prognostic and clinicopathological value of MUC1 expression in CRC. The Revman version 5.3 package and STATA, version 12 were employed for pooled analysis and analysis of publication bias.ResultsThis meta-analysis included 16 published studies. The combined analysis showed that CRC patients with high MUC1 expression had a worse clinical outcome in overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.30-1.75, P <.00001). In addition, high MUC1 expression was associated with higher TNM stage (RR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.17-1.77, P = .0007), greater depth of invasion (RR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.10-1.53, P = .002), and lymph node metastasis (RR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.20-1.80, P = .0002) of CRC. However, the elevated MUC1 expression was not related to disease-free survival/recurrence-free survival (DFS/RFS) (HR = 1.51, 95% CI = 0.78-2.89, P = .22), histological grade (RR = 1.15, 95% CI = 0.96-1.38, P = .12), gender (RR = 0.95; 95% CI = 0.83-1.08, P = .44), tumor size (RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.85-1.44, P = .44), tumor site (RR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.88-1.16, P = .84), or mucinous component (RR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.60-1.14, P = .24) in CRC.ConclusionOur findings indicated that high MUC1 expression represents a marker of poor prognosis in CRC. Meanwhile, elevated MUC1 expression was associated with advanced TNM stage, greater depth of invasion, and lymph node metastasis.

Project description:BackgroundThe prognostic value of HIFs in colorectal cancer was evaluated in a large number of studies, but the conclusions were inconclusive. Meanwhile, clinicopathologic differences of HIF-1? and HIF-2? were rarely compared in recent studies.MethodologyIdentical search strategies were used to search relevant literatures in the PubMed and Web of Science databases. The prognostic significances and clinicopathological differences of HIFs in CRC were analyzed.Principal findingsA total of 23 studies comprising 2984 CRC patients met the inclusion criteria. The results indicated that overexpressed HIFs were significantly associated with increase of mortality risk, including overall survival (OS) (HR 2.06 95%CI 1.55-2.74) and disease free survival (HR 2.84, 95%CI 1.87-4.31). Subgroup analysis revealed that both overexpressed HIF-1? and HIF-2? had correlations with worse prognosis. The pooled HRs were 2.01 (95% CI: 1.55-2.6) and 2.07(95% CI: 1.01-4.26). Further subgroup analysis on HIF-1? was performed by study location, number of patients, quality score and cut-off value. The results showed that HIF-1? overexpression was significantly associated with poor OS, particularly in Asian countries (HR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.74-3.01), while not in European or other countries. In addition, overexpression of HIF-1? was closely related with these clinicopathological features, including Dukes' stages (OR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.17-0.89), UICC stages (OR 0.42 95% CI: 0.3-0.59), depth of invasion (OR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.51-0.99), lymphnode status (OR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.32-0.73) and metastasis (OR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11-0.81). While overexpression of HIF-2? was only associated with grade of differentiation (OR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.29-0.81).ConclusionsThis study showed that both HIF-1? and HIF-2? overexpression were associated with an unfavorable prognosis. HIF-1? overexpression seemed to be associated with worse prognosis in Asian countries. Additionally, HIF-1? and HIF-2? indicated distinct clinicopathologic features.

Dataset Information

The Prognostic and Clinical Value of CD44 in Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Publications

The Prognostic and Clinical Value of CD44 in Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets