Dataset Information

Stroke severity quantification by critical care physicians in a mobile stroke unit.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Cerebral revascularization in acute stroke requires robust diagnostic tools close to symptom onset. The quantitative National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is widely used in-hospital, whereas shorter and less specific stroke scales are used in the prehospital field. This study explored the accuracy and potential clinical benefit of using NIHSS prehospitally. PATIENTS AND METHODS:Thirteen anesthesiologists trained in prehospital critical care enrolled patients with suspected acute stroke in a mobile stroke unit. NIHSS was completed twice in the acute phase: first prehospitally and then by an on-call resident neurologist at the receiving hospital. The agreement between prehospital and in-hospital NIHSS scores was assessed by a Bland-Altman plot, and inter-rater agreement for predefined clinical categories was tested using Cohen's ?. RESULTS:This Norwegian Acute Stroke Prehospital Project study included 40 patients for analyses. The mean numerical difference between prehospital and in-hospital NIHSS scores was 0.85, with corresponding limits of agreement from -?5.94 to 7.64. Inter-rater agreement (?) for the corresponding clinical categories was 0.38. A prehospital diagnostic workup (NIHSS and computed tomographic examination) was completed in median (quartiles) 10?min (range: 7-14?min). Time between the prehospital and in-hospital NIHSS scores was median (quartiles) 40?min (32-48?min). CONCLUSION:Critical care physicians in a mobile stroke unit may use the NIHSS as a clinical tool in the assessment of patients experiencing acute stroke. The disagreement in NIHSS scores was mainly for very low values and would not have changed the handling of the patients.

SUBMITTER: Hov MR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6504122 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Stroke severity quantification by critical care physicians in a mobile stroke unit.

Hov Maren R MR Røislien Jo J Lindner Thomas T Zakariassen Erik E Bache Kristi C G KCG Solyga Volker M VM Russell David D Lund Christian G CG

European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine 20190601 3

<h4>Background</h4>Cerebral revascularization in acute stroke requires robust diagnostic tools close to symptom onset. The quantitative National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) is widely used in-hospital, whereas shorter and less specific stroke scales are used in the prehospital field. This study explored the accuracy and potential clinical benefit of using NIHSS prehospitally.<h4>Patients and methods</h4>Thirteen anesthesiologists trained in prehospital critical care enrolled patients ...[more]

PMID: 29239899

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundInternationally, Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU) ambulances have changed pre-hospital acute stroke care delivery. MSU clinical and cost-effectiveness studies are emerging, but little is known about important factors for achieving sustainability of this innovative model of care.MethodsMixed-methods study from the Melbourne MSU (operational since November 2017) process evaluation. Participant purposive sampling included clinical, operational and executive/management representatives from Ambulance Victoria (AV) (emergency medical service provider), the MSU clinical team, and receiving hospitals. Sustainability was defined as ongoing MSU operations, including MSU workforce and future model considerations. Theoretically-based on-line survey with Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), Self Determination Theory (SDT, Intrinsic Motivation), and open-text questions targeting barriers and benefits was administered (June-September 2019). Individual/group interviews were conducted, eliciting improvement suggestions and requirements for ongoing use. Descriptive and regression analyses (quantitative data) and directed content and thematic analysis (open text and interview data) were conducted.ResultsThere were 135 surveys completed. Identifying that the MSU was beneficial to daily work (β=0.61), not experiencing pressure/tension about working on the MSU (β=0.17) and thinking they did well working within the team model (β=0.17) were significantly associated with wanting to continue working within the MSU model [R2=0.76; F(15, 60)=12.76, P<.001]. Experiences varied between those on the MSU team and those working with the MSU. Advantages were identified for patients (better, faster care) and clinicians (interdisciplinary learning). Disadvantages included challenges integrating into established systems, and establishing working relationships. Themes identified from 35 interviews were MSU team composition, MSU vehicle design and layout, personnel recruitment and rostering, communication improvements between organisations, telemedicine options, MSU operations and dispatch specificity.ConclusionImportant factors affecting the sustainability of the MSU model of stroke care emerged. A cohesive team approach, with identifiable benefits and good communication between participating organisations is important for clinical and operational sustainability.

Project description:ImportanceSo far, uncertainty remains as to whether there is sufficient cumulative evidence that mobile stroke unit (MSU; specialized ambulance equipped with computed tomography scanner, point-of-care laboratory, and neurological expertise) use leads to better functional outcomes compared with usual care.ObjectiveTo determine with a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature whether MSU use is associated with better functional outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).Data sourcesMEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase from 1960 to 2021.Study selectionStudies comparing MSU deployment and usual care for patients with suspected stroke were eligible for analysis, excluding case series and case-control studies.Data extraction and synthesisIndependent data extraction by 2 observers, following the PRISMA and MOOSE reporting guidelines. The risk of bias in each study was determined using the ROBINS-I and RoB2 tools. In the case of articles with partially overlapping study populations, unpublished disentangled results were obtained. Data were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was excellent outcome as measured with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS; score of 0 to 1 at 90 days).ResultsCompared with usual care, MSU use was associated with excellent outcome (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.64; 95% CI, 1.27-2.13; P < .001; 5 studies; n = 3228), reduced disability over the full range of the mRS (adjusted common OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.14-1.70; P = .001; 3 studies; n = 1563), good outcome (mRS score of 0 to 2: crude OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.09-1.44; P = .001; 6 studies; n = 3266), shorter onset-to-intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) times (median reduction, 31 minutes [95% CI, 23-39]; P < .001; 13 studies; n = 3322), delivery of IVT (crude OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.58-2.12; P < .001; 7 studies; n = 4790), and IVT within 60 minutes of symptom onset (crude OR, 7.71; 95% CI, 4.17-14.25; P < .001; 8 studies; n = 3351). MSU use was not associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality at 7 days or at 90 days or with higher proportions of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after IVT.Conclusions and relevanceCompared with usual care, MSU use was associated with an approximately 65% increase in the odds of excellent outcome and a 30-minute reduction in onset-to-IVT times, without safety concerns. These results should help guideline writing committees and policy makers.

Project description:BackgroundStudies investigating the Mobile Stroke Unit (MSU) concept have shown increased thrombolysis rates, reduced alarm-to-treatment times and improved prehospital triage. Yet, so far, there is no definite scientific proof of better functional outcome after MSU deployment compared to regular ambulances.MethodsWe provide a revised protocol for the second part of the B_PROUD trial as organization of the MSU dispatch did not meet the anticipated standards in the first part. B_PROUD is a pragmatic, prospective study comparing functional outcomes of treatment candidates with or without MSU care. Treatment candidates are defined as patients with a final diagnosis of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, onset-to-dispatch-times ≤4 h, disabling symptoms not resolved at time of ambulance arrival, and the ability to ambulate prior to the qualifying event. These patients are included if their emergency call prompted a stroke alarm at the dispatch center during MSU operation hours (7 am-11 pm, Monday-Sunday) and if the emergency is located within the MSU operation area in Berlin, Germany. The intervention group consists of patients who are cared for by the MSU. When the MSU is already in operation for another emergency, MSU dispatches are handled by regular ambulances (about 45%). These dispatches create the control group. Blinded stroke physicians assess the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score in recorded structured interviews 3 months after stroke. The primary outcome is the degree of disability and death over the full range of the mRS. As a change to the previously published protocol and only pertinent in case of more than 9% lost-to-follow-up, a co-primary outcome was introduced consisting of the proportions of death, new institutional care or severe disability in patients with additional use of information from registration offices.PerspectiveThe results will inform parties involved in acute stroke care organization on the effectiveness of the MSU concept.Trial registrationThe protocol is registered in (NCT03931616) and has been approved by the ethical review committee of the Charité - University Medicine Berlin (EA4/109/15) on September 2, 2015. The study protocol of B_PROUD part 1 had been published in the International Journal of Stroke as "Berlin Prehospital Or Usual Delivery of acute stroke care (B_PROUD) - study protocol" (doi: 10.1177/1747493017700152) on March 22, 2017 [1] previous to first patient's registration.

Project description:BackgroundThe available literature on mobile stroke units (MSU) has focused on clinical outcomes, rather than operational performance. Our objective was to establish normalized metrics and to conduct a meta-analysis of the current literature on MSU performance.MethodsOur MSU in upstate New York serves 741,000 people. We present prospectively collected, retrospectively analyzed data from the inception of our MSU in October of 2018, through March of 2021. Rates of transportation/dispatch and MSU utilization were reported. We also performed a meta-analysis using MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library databases, calculating rates of tPA/dispatch, tPA-per-24-operational-hours ("per day"), mechanical thrombectomy (MT)/dispatch and MT/day.ResultsOur MSU was dispatched 1,719 times in 606 days (8.5 dispatches/24-operational-hours) and transported 324 patients (18.8%) to the hospital. Intravenous tPA was administered in 64 patients (3.7% of dispatches) and the rate of tPA/day was 0.317 (95% CI 0.150-0.567). MT was performed in 24 patients (1.4% of dispatches) for a MT/day rate of 0.119 (95% CI 0.074-0.163). The MSU was in use for 38,742 minutes out of 290,760 total available minutes (13.3% utilization rate). Our meta-analysis included 14 articles. Eight studies were included in the analysis of tPA/dispatch (342/5,862) for a rate of 7.2% (95% CI 4.8-9.5%, I2 = 92%) and 11 were included in the analysis of tPA/day (1,858/4,961) for a rate of 0.358 (95% CI 0.215-0.502, I2 = 99%). Seven studies were included for MT/dispatch (102/5,335) for a rate of 2.0% (95% CI 1.2-2.8%, I2 = 67%) and MT/day (103/1,249) for a rate of 0.092 (95% CI 0.046-0.138, I2 = 91%).ConclusionsIn this single institution retrospective study and meta-analysis, we outline the following operational metrics: tPA/dispatch, tPA/day, MT/dispatch, MT/day, and utilization rate. These metrics are useful for internal and external comparison for institutions with or considering developing mobile stroke programs.

Dataset Information

Stroke severity quantification by critical care physicians in a mobile stroke unit.

Publications

Stroke severity quantification by critical care physicians in a mobile stroke unit.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets