Dataset Information

Safety of low-dose subcutaneous recombinant interleukin-2: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

ABSTRACT: Standard-dose intravenous recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) is indicated for the treatment of some subtypes of cancer; however, severe adverse events, including venous thromboembolism (VTE), may complicate its administration. Low-dose subcutaneous rIL-2 is being studied for the management of immune-mediated diseases, since it can modulate the immunological response by specifically targeting T regulatory (T_reg) cells; importantly, it is supposed to cause fewer or no complications. In this systematic review and meta-analysis of phase II-III randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we investigated the safety of low-dose (<6 Million International Unit [MIU]/day) and ultra-low-dose (?1 MIU/day) rIL-2 for severe adverse events (grade III-V) with a focus on VTE. Data of 1,321 patients from 24 RCTs were analysed: 661 patients were randomized to the rIL-2 arm (on top of standard of care) and 660 patients to standard of care alone or placebo. Two studies reported higher rates of thrombocytopenia in the low-dose rIL-2 arm. Ultra-low-dose rIL-2 was reported to be well tolerated in 6 studies with a negligible rate of severe adverse events. Symptomatic VTE events were not reported in any of the study arms (absolute risk difference 0% [95%CI -0.1%; +0.1%]). Our results may facilitate the study and introduction in clinical practice of low-dose rIL-2 for potentially new indications.

SUBMITTER: Mahmoudpour SH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6509335 | biostudies-literature | 2019 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Safety of low-dose subcutaneous recombinant interleukin-2: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Mahmoudpour Seyed Hamidreza SH Jankowski Marius M Valerio Luca L Becker Christian C Espinola-Klein Christine C Konstantinides Stavros S Quitzau Kurt K Barco Stefano S

Scientific reports 20190509 1

Standard-dose intravenous recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) is indicated for the treatment of some subtypes of cancer; however, severe adverse events, including venous thromboembolism (VTE), may complicate its administration. Low-dose subcutaneous rIL-2 is being studied for the management of immune-mediated diseases, since it can modulate the immunological response by specifically targeting T regulatory (T<sub>reg</sub>) cells; importantly, it is supposed to cause fewer or no complications. In t ...[more]

PMID: 31073219

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportancePrimary Sjögren syndrome (pSS) is a systemic autoimmune disease associated with dysregulated immune cells, with no efficient therapy. There is a need to study potential therapeutic approaches.ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy, safety, and immune response of low-dose interleukin 2 (LD-IL-2) in the treatment of pSS.Design, setting, and participantsA double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted with a 2-group superiority design from June 2015 to August 2017. Sixty patients, aged 18 to 70 years, were recruited from Peking University People's Hospital. Efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle. Data were analyzed from December 2018 to March 2020.InterventionsPatients with pSS were treated with LD-IL-2 or placebo for 12 weeks and accompanied by 12 weeks of follow-up.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary end point was defined as a 3-point or greater improvement on the European League Against Rheumatism Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) by week 24. The secondary end points included other clinical responses, safety, and changes of immune cell subsets at week 12 and 24.ResultsSixty patients with pSS were recruited, with 30 in the LD-IL-2 group (mean [SD] age, 47.6 [12.8] years; 30 [100%] women) and 30 in the placebo group (mean [SD] age, 51.0 [11.9] years; 30 [100%] women), and 57 completed the trial. More patients in the LD-IL-2 group (20 [66.7%]) achieved ESSDAI score reduction of at least 3 points than in the placebo group (8 [26.7%]) at week 24 (P = .004). There were greater resolutions of dryness, pain, and fatigue in the LD-IL-2 group than placebo group at week 12 (dryness: difference, -18.33 points; 95% CI, -28.46 to -8.21 points; P = .001; pain: difference, -10.33 points; 95% CI, -19.38 to -1.29 points; P = .03; fatigue: difference, -11.67 points; 95% CI, -20.65 to -2.68 points; P = .01). No severe adverse events were observed in either group. In addition, the LD-IL-2 group showed a significant decrease in infection compared with the placebo group (1 [3.3%] vs 9 [30.0%]; P = .006). Immunological analysis revealed that LD-IL-2 promoted an expansion of regulatory T cells and regulatory CD24highCD27+ B cells.Conclusions and relevanceIn this randomized clinical trial, LD-IL-2 was effective and well tolerated in patients with pSS, and it restored immune balance, with enhanced regulatory T cells and CD24highCD27+ B cells.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02464319.

Project description:Background and objectiveChronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) is very common, with a lifetime prevalence between 51% and 80%. In majority, it is nonspecific in nature and multifactorial in etiology. Pregabalin (PG) and Gabapentin (GB) are gabapentinoids that have demonstrated benefit in neuropathic pain conditions. Despite no clear rationale, they are increasingly used for nonspecific CLBP. They necessitate prolonged use and are associated with adverse effects and increased cost. Recent guidelines from the National Health Service (NHS), England, expressed concerns on their off-label use, in addition to the risk of misuse. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of gabapentinoids in adult CLBP patients.MethodsElectronic databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched from their inception until December 20th, 2016. We included randomized control trials reporting the use of gabapentinoids for the treatment of CLBP of >3 months duration, in adult patients. Study selection and data extraction was performed independently by paired reviewers. Outcomes were guided by Initiative on Methods, Measurement and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials guidelines, with pain relief and safety as the primary outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed for outcomes reported in 3 or more studies. Outcomes were reported as mean differences (MDs) or risk ratios (RRs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and I2 in percentage representing the percentage variability in effect estimates that could be explained by heterogeneity. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) was used to assess the quality of evidence.ResultsOut of 1,385 citations, eight studies were included. Based on the interventions and comparators, studies were analyzed in 3 different groups. GB compared with placebo (3 studies, n = 185) showed minimal improvement of pain (MD = 0.22 units, 95% CI [-0.5 to 0.07] I2 = 0%; GRADE: very low). Three studies compared PG with other types of analgesic medication (n = 332) and showed greater improvement in the other analgesic group (MD = 0.42 units, 95% CI [0.20 to 0.64] I2 = 0; GRADE: very low). Studies using PG as an adjuvant (n = 423) were not pooled due to heterogeneity, but the largest of them showed no benefit of adding PG to tapentadol. There were no deaths or hospitalizations reported. Compared with placebo, the following adverse events were more commonly reported with GB: dizziness-(RR = 1.99, 95% CI [1.17 to 3.37], I2 = 49); fatigue (RR = 1.85, 95% CI [1.12 to 3.05], I2 = 0); difficulties with mentation (RR = 3.34, 95% CI [1.54 to 7.25], I2 = 0); and visual disturbances (RR = 5.72, 95% CI [1.94 to 16.91], I2 = 0). The number needed to harm with 95% CI for dizziness, fatigue, difficulties with mentation, and visual disturbances were 7 (4 to 30), 8 (4 to 44), 6 (4 to 15), and 6 (4 to 13) respectively. The GRADE evidence quality was noted to be very low for dizziness and fatigue, low for difficulties with mentation, and moderate for visual disturbances. Functional and emotional improvements were reported by few studies and showed no significant improvements.Conclusions and relevanceExisting evidence on the use of gabapentinoids in CLBP is limited and demonstrates significant risk of adverse effects without any demonstrated benefit. Given the lack of efficacy, risks, and costs associated, the use of gabapentinoids for CLBP merits caution. There is need for large high-quality trials to more definitively inform this issue.Trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42016034040.

Dataset Information

Safety of low-dose subcutaneous recombinant interleukin-2: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Publications

Safety of low-dose subcutaneous recombinant interleukin-2: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets