Dataset Information

Effects of short-term cash and food incentives on food insecurity and nutrition among HIV-infected adults in Tanzania.

ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:Food insecurity impedes antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence. We previously demonstrated that short-term cash and food incentives increased ART possession and retention in HIV services in Tanzania. To elucidate potential pathways that led to these achievements, we examined whether incentives also improved food insecurity. DESIGN:Three-arm randomized controlled trial. METHODS:From 2013 to 2015, 805 food-insecure adult ART initiates (?90 days) at three clinics were randomized to receive cash or food transfers (?$11 per month for ?6 months, conditional on visit attendance) or standard-of-care (SOC) services. We assessed changes from baseline to 6 and 12 months in: food insecurity (severe; access; dietary diversity), nutritional status (body weight; BMI), and work status. Difference-in-differences average treatment effects were estimated using inverse-probability-of-censoring-weighted longitudinal regression models. RESULTS:The modified intention-to-treat analysis included 777 nonpregnant participants with 41.6% severe food insecurity. All three study groups experienced improvements from baseline in food insecurity, nutritional status, and work status. After 6 months, severe food insecurity declined within the cash (-31.4% points to 11.5%) and food (-30.3 to 10.4%) groups, but not within the SOC. Relative to the SOC, severe food insecurity decreased by an additional 24.3% points for cash (95% CI -45.0 to -3.5) and 23.3% percent points for food (95% CI -43.8 to -2.7). Neither intervention augmented improvements in severe food insecurity at 12 months, nor food access, dietary diversity, nutritional status, or work status at 6 or 12 months. CONCLUSION:Small cash and food transfers provided at treatment initiation may mitigate severe food insecurity. These effects may have facilitated previously observed improvements in ART adherence.

SUBMITTER: Fahey CA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6511258 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effects of short-term cash and food incentives on food insecurity and nutrition among HIV-infected adults in Tanzania.

Fahey Carolyn A CA Njau Prosper F PF Dow William H WH Kapologwe Ntuli A NA McCoy Sandra I SI

AIDS (London, England) 20190301 3

<h4>Objective</h4>Food insecurity impedes antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence. We previously demonstrated that short-term cash and food incentives increased ART possession and retention in HIV services in Tanzania. To elucidate potential pathways that led to these achievements, we examined whether incentives also improved food insecurity.<h4>Design</h4>Three-arm randomized controlled trial.<h4>Methods</h4>From 2013 to 2015, 805 food-insecure adult ART initiates (≤90 days) at three clinics wer ...[more]

PMID: 30325776

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundFood insecurity is an important barrier to retention in care and adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) among people living with HIV infection (PLHIV). However, there is a lack of rigorous evidence about how to improve food security and HIV-related clinical outcomes. To address this gap, this randomized trial will evaluate three delivery models for short-term food and nutrition support for food insecure PLHIV in Shinyanga, Tanzania: nutrition assessment and counseling (NAC) alone, NAC plus food assistance, and NAC plus cash transfers.Methods/designAt three HIV care and treatment sites, 788 participants will be randomized into one of three study arms in a 3:3:1 ratio, stratified by site: NAC plus food assistance, NAC plus cash transfer, and NAC only. Eligible participants are: 1) at least 18 years of age; 2) living with HIV infection; 3) initiated ART in the past 90 days; and 4) food insecure, as measured with the Household Hunger Scale. PLHIV who are severely malnourished (body mass index (BMI) < 16 kg/m(2)) will be excluded. Participants randomized to receive food or cash transfers are eligible to receive assistance for up to six months, conditional on attending regularly scheduled visits with their HIV care provider. Participants will be followed for 12 months: the initial 6-month intervention period and then for another 6 months post-intervention. The primary outcome is ART adherence measured with the medication possession ratio. Secondary outcomes include 1) retention in care; 2) nutritional indicators including changes in food security, BMI, and weight gain; 3) viral suppression and self-reported ART adherence; and 4) participation in the labor force.DiscussionThis rigorously designed trial will inform policy decisions regarding supportive strategies for food insecure PLHIV in the early stages of treatment. The study will measure outcomes immediately after the period of support ends as well as 6 months later, providing information on the duration of the interventions' effect. The comparison of food to cash transfers will better inform policies favoring cash assistance or will provide rationale for the continued investment in food and nutrition interventions for PLHIV.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01957917.

Project description:IntroductionConditional economic incentives are shown to promote medication adherence across a range of health conditions and settings; however, any long-term harms or benefits from these time-limited interventions remain largely unevaluated. We assessed 2-3 years outcomes from a 6-month incentive programme in Tanzania that originally improved short-term retention in HIV care and medication possession.MethodsWe traced former participants in a 2013-2016 trial, which randomised 800 food-insecure adults starting HIV treatment at three clinics to receive either usual care (control) or up to 6 months of cash or food transfers (~US$11/month) contingent on timely attendance at monthly clinic appointments. The primary intention-to-treat analysis estimated 24-month and 36-month marginal risk differences (RD) between incentive and control groups for retention in care and all-cause mortality, using multiple imputation for a minority of missing outcomes. We also estimated mortality HRs from time-stratified Cox regression.ResultsFrom 3 March 2018 to 19 September 2019, we determined 36-month retention and mortality statuses for 737 (92%) and 700 (88%) participants, respectively. Overall, approximately 660 (83%) participants were in care at 36 months while 43 (5%) had died. There were no differences between groups in retention at 24 months (86.5% intervention vs 84.4% control, RD 2.1, 95% CI -5.2 to 9.3) or 36 months (83.3% vs 77.8%, RD 5.6, -2.7 to 13.8), nor in mortality at either time point. The intervention group had a lower rate of death during the first 18 months (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.74); mortality was similar thereafter (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.33 to 3.79).ConclusionThese findings confirm that incentives are a safe and effective tool to promote short-term adherence and potentially avert early deaths at the critical time of HIV treatment initiation. Complementary strategies are recommended to sustain lifelong retention in HIV care.Trial registration numberNCT01957917.

Project description:Importance:Food insecurity is a pervasive public health issue in the US that is associated with greater body weight. Objective:To examine national trends in food insecurity among US adults from 1999 to 2016 according to surrogate measures of adiposity (body mass index [BMI] and waist circumference [WC]). Design, Setting, and Participants:This cross-sectional study analyzed nationally representative data obtained from nine 2-year cycles (1999 to 2000 through 2015 to 2016) of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey in the US. The sample comprised adult survey participants aged 20 years or older. Data analyses were performed from July 1, 2019, to March 31, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures:The primary outcome was food insecurity. Data on BMI (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) were categorized as follows: normal weight (BMI, <25), overweight (BMI, 25-29.9), and obese (BMI, ?30). Data on WC were categorized as follows: less high risk (men: ?102 cm; women: ?88 cm) or high risk (men: >102 cm; women: >88 cm). Food insecurity prevalence by adiposity was further analyzed using key demographic characteristics, including sex and race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and Other). Results:Among the 46?145 adults in the final sample, the mean (SD) age was 46.9 (0.2) years. Of this sample, 23?957 were women (52.0%; 95% CI, 51.6%-52.5%) and 20?825 were non-Hispanic White adults (68.8%; 95% CI, 66.6%-71.0%). The estimated prevalence of food insecurity was 18.2% (95% CI, 15.3%-21.2%) in the 2015 to 2016 cycle, a statistically significant change from 8.7% (95% CI, 7.3%-10.2%) in the 1999 to 2000 cycle. Among all adiposity categories, food insecurity prevalence significantly increased from the 1999 to 2000 cycle to the 2015 to 2016 cycle. The prevalence of food insecurity was highest in adults with obesity (22.6%; 95% CI, 19.5%-25.8%; P for trend <.001). For both men and women, food insecurity prevalence significantly increased from the 1999 to 2000 cycle (men: 8.8% [95% CI, 6.9%-10.6%]; women: 8.7% [95% CI, 7.0%-10.5%]) to the 2015 to 2016 cycle (men: 17.2% [95% CI, 14.1%-20.2%]; women: 19.2% [95% CI, 16.2%-22.2%]; P for trends <.001). For non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black adults, food insecurity prevalence increased from the 1999 to 2000 cycle (non-Hispanic White: 6.0% [95% CI, 4.0%-8.0%]; non-Hispanic Black: 12.4% [95% CI, 9.6%-15.2%]) to the 2015 to 2016 cycle (non-Hispanic White: 13.0% [95% CI, 9.8%-16.3%]; non-Hispanic Black: 29.1% [95% CI, 24.2%-34.0%]; P for trends <.001). For Hispanic adults, food insecurity prevalence significantly increased in those with obesity (1999-2000: 19.1% [95% CI, 12.0%-26.1%]; 2015-2016: 37.6% [95% CI, 33.7%-41.5%]; P for trend ?.001) and in both less-high-risk WC (1999-2000: 19.6% [95% CI, 12.8%-26.4%]; 2015-2016: 32.5% [95% CI, 27.3%-37.7%]; P for trend?=?.02) and high-risk WC categories (1999-2000: 19.3% [95% CI, 12.7%-25.9%]; 2015-2016: 36.7% [95% CI, 31.7%-41.7%]; P for trend <.001). Conclusions and Relevance:In this cross-sectional study, the estimated prevalence of food insecurity appeared to increase from 1999 to 2016 and across all levels of adiposity. These results suggest the need for multidisciplinary approaches to address the association between food insecurity and obesity in the US.

Dataset Information

Effects of short-term cash and food incentives on food insecurity and nutrition among HIV-infected adults in Tanzania.

Publications

Effects of short-term cash and food incentives on food insecurity and nutrition among HIV-infected adults in Tanzania.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets