Combination of Immunotherapy With Targeted Therapy: Theory and Practice in Metastatic Melanoma.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Yu C
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6513976 | biostudies-literature | 2019
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Resistance to targeted therapy is an ongoing problem for the successful treatment of Stage IV metastatic melanoma. For many patients, the use of targeted therapies, such as BRAF kinase inhibitors, were initially promising yet resistance inevitably occurred. Even after combining BRAF kinase inhibitors with MEK pathway inhibitors to offset re-activation of the MAP kinase pathway, resistance is still documented. Similarly, outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors as monotherapy were optimistic for some patients without relapse or progression, yet the majority of patients undergoing monotherapy have progressive disease. Will immunotherapy and combination therapy trials overcome resistance in metastatic melanoma? In an effort to treat resistant disease, new clinical trials evaluating the combination of immunotherapy with other therapies, such as kinase inhibitors, adoptive cell therapy, chimeric CD40 ligand to boost costimulation, or a tumor-specific oncolytic virus enhancing granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) expression, are currently underway. Updated studies on the mechanisms of resistance, immune escape and options to reinvigorate immune cells support the continued discovery of new and improved forms of therapy.
| S-EPMC5650456 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer and one of the few malignancies whose incidence is on the rise. The treatment of metastatic melanoma continues to be quite challenging, although in recent years, there has been significant progress. Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines list immunotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery and clinical trials as potential options for patients with metastatic disease but do not clearly recommend which is superior. Additionally, when utilizing combined modality treatment there are no clear guidelines for the optimal timing of surgery in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. In this paper we sought to compile the current evidence and on-going trials in order to provide a comprehensive review of the different options available and underway in regards to the treatment of metastatic melanoma. It is clear that with the responses now seen with systemic immunotherapies and targeted therapies, an expanded role for surgery is the logical next step.
| S-EPMC6094597 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Very late antigen-4 (VLA-4; also known as integrin α4β1) is expressed at high levels in aggressive and metastatic melanoma tumors and may provide an ideal target for imaging and targeted radiotherapy. 177Lu-DOTA-PEG4-LLP2A (177Lu-LLP2A) shows high affinity for VLA-4 and had high uptake in B16F10 mouse melanoma tumors in vivo. Here, we report efficacy studies of 177Lu-LLP2A, alone and combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in B16F10 tumor-bearing mice. Methods: B16F10 tumor cells (1 x 106) were implanted subcutaneously in C57BL/6 mice. After 8-10 days, the mice were randomized into eight groups (n = 8). 177Lu-LLP2A was injected i.v. on day 8 or 9 (single dose), and ICI antibodies were administered i.p. in 3 doses. Tumor growth was monitored over time via calipers. TUNEL staining for apoptosis was performed on fixed tumors. In a separate study, Cy3-LLP2A or Cy3-scramble LLP2A were injected in tumor-bearing mice, tumors were collected after 4 h post-injection, and then analyzed by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence microscopy using different immune cell markers. Results:177Lu-LLP2A alone showed comparable efficacy to combination anti-PD-1/PD-L1 + anti-CTLA-4 antibody treatment, while 177Lu-LLP2A together with combination ICI significantly enhanced survival. TUNEL staining showed the highest levels of apoptosis were found in the 177Lu-LLP2A + ICI groups. In addition to targeting tumor cells, 177Lu-LLP2A also binds immune cells in the B16F10 tumor microenvironment. Based on flow cytometry data, the tumor consists of ~77 % tumor cells/fibroblasts (CD45-CD49d+) and ~23 % immune cells (CD45+CD49d+), and immune cells express higher levels of VLA-4. Cy3-LLP2A and CD49d colocalized with macrophages (CD68), T cells (CD8, CD4), and B cells (CD19). Immunohistochemical analysis identified a significant colocalization of Cy3-LLP2A and CD68. Conclusion: Combination treatment of 177Lu-LLP2A and ICI targets both tumor cells and immune cells and has potential as a therapeutic agent in patients with metastatic melanoma.
| S-EPMC6278902 | biostudies-other
Project description:BackgroundCytotoxic chemotherapy (CC) is currently used in metastatic melanoma after patients have developed resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and/or Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase inhibitors (MAPKi). We sought to evaluate if a previous treatment by ICI or MAPKi influences clinical outcomes in patients treated by CC in metastatic melanoma.MethodsEighty-eight patients with a metastatic melanoma, treated by CC after a previous treatment by ICI or MAPKi between January 2009 and October 2019, were retrospectively analyzed. Progression-Free-Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS), Overall Response Rate (ORR), and Disease Control Rate (DCR) were evaluated in patients treated by CC according to their prior treatment by ICI or MAPKi.ResultsPatients treated by CC after ICI tended to have a better median PFS (2.81 months (2.39-5.30) versus 2.40 months (0.91-2.75), p = 0.023), median OS (6.03 months (3.54-11.54) versus 4.44 months (1.54-8.59), p = 0.27), DCR (26.0% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.121) and ORR (22.0% vs. 7.9% p = 0.134) than those previously treated by MAPKi.ConclusionsA prior treatment by an MAPKi may be associated with a worse response to CC than ICI, and further investigations should be performed to confirm if there is a clinical benefit to propose CC in this setting.
| S-EPMC8124115 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Opinion statementMelanoma has several clinically and pathologically distinguishable subtypes, which also differ genetically. Mutation patterns vary among different melanoma subtypes, and efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors differs depending on the subtype of melanoma. In spite of the recent revolution of systemic therapies for advanced melanoma, access to innovative agents is still restricted in many countries. This review article aimed to describe the epidemiology and current status of systemic therapies for melanoma in Japan, where melanoma is rare, but access to innovative agents is available. Acral and mucosal melanomas, which are common in Asian populations, predominantly occur in sun-protected areas and share several biological features. Both the melanomas harbor KIT mutation in approximately 15% of the cases; BRAF or NRAS mutation is found in approximately 10-15% of acral melanoma, but these mutations are less frequent in mucosal melanoma. Combined use of BRAF and MEK inhibitors is one of the standards of care for patients with advanced BRAF-mutant melanoma. In patients with melanoma harboring KIT mutation in exon 11 or 13, KIT inhibitors can be a treatment option; however, none of them have been approved in Japan. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors are expected to be less effective against acral and mucosal melanomas because their somatic mutation burden is lower than those in non-acral cutaneous melanomas. A recently completed phase II trial of nivolumab and ipilimumab combination therapy in 30 Japanese patients with melanoma, including seven with acral and 12 with mucosal melanoma, demonstrated an objective response rate of 43%. Regarding oncolytic viruses, canerpaturev (C-REV, also known as HF10) and talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) are currently under review in early phase trials. In the adjuvant setting, dabrafenib plus trametinb combination, nivolumab monotherapy, and pembrolizumab monotherapy were approved in July, August, and December 2018 in Japan, respectively. However, most of the adjuvant phase III trials excluded patients with mucosal melanoma. A phase III trial of adjuvant therapy with locoregional interferon (IFN)-β versus surgery alone is ongoing in Japan (JCOG1309, J-FERON), in which IFN-β is injected directly into the site of the primary tumor postoperatively, so that it would be drained through the untreated lymphatic route to the regional node basin. After the recent approval of these new agents, the JCOG1309 trial will be revised to focus on patients with stage II disease. In conclusion, acral and mucosal melanomas have been treated based on the available medical evidence for the treatment of non-acral cutaneous melanomas. Considering the differences in genetic backgrounds and therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapy, specialized therapeutic strategies for these subtypes of melanoma should be established in the future.
| S-EPMC6344396 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Harnessing the immune system to attack cancer cells has represented a holy grail for greater than 100years. While prospects of tumor-selective durable immune based therapies have provided small clinical signals for many decades, recent years have demonstrated a virtual explosion in progress. Melanoma has led the field of cancers in which immunotherapy has produced major clinical inroads. The most significant and impactful immunotherapies for melanoma utilize immune checkpoint inhibition to stimulate T cell mediated tumor killing. The major targets of checkpoint blockade have thus far been CTLA4 and PD1, two key receptors for central and peripheral immune tolerance. This review discusses current understanding of how these checkpoint blockade therapeutics have led to major clinical responses in patients with advanced melanoma. It is likely that we are poised to see significantly greater anti-cancer immunotherapy efficacy, both in improving response rates and durability for melanoma, and for other less immunogenic malignancies.
| S-EPMC5569887 | biostudies-other
Project description:BackgroundImmunotherapies and targeted therapies have drastically improved survival in metastatic melanoma, but they can cause a range of adverse events (AEs). Understanding the costs of these events would facilitate an accurate comparison of melanoma treatments.ObjectiveTo compare the costs and frequency of AEs associated with immunotherapy and with targeted therapy in elderly patients with metastatic melanoma.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using Medicare claims data from 2011 to 2014. Patients included had to have ≥1 diagnoses of metastatic melanoma and ≥1 claims for an immunotherapy or targeted therapy. We compared the 30-day expenditures of patients with and without each AE using a generalized linear model to determine the incremental cost per AE in patients who received immunotherapy or targeted therapy. The baseline demographic and clinical differences were adjusted for using propensity score with inverse probability of treatment. We also compared the mean costs of AEs associated with immunotherapy and targeted therapy.ResultsA total of 844 patients were included in the study (mean age, 75 years; standard deviation, 14 years). The mean baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 8.4, and 65% of the patients were male. The mean cost for AEs was highest for respiratory events (ie, $24,150). Gastrointestinal, respiratory, and hematologic AEs were more common in patients who received immunotherapy, whereas general and administration-site AEs and other AEs (eg, fatigue, infections, muscular weakness) were more frequent in patients who received targeted therapy. AE-related costs with immunotherapy were highest for gastrointestinal, respiratory, and pain-related AEs; AEs with targeted therapy were highest for cardiovascular and general and administration-site events.ConclusionThese findings suggest that incremental costs associated with treatment-related AEs among elderly patients with metastatic melanoma were substantial, but the risks for and costs of the various types of AEs differed by therapy. Understanding the risks for and costs of AEs associated with the various therapeutic options can inform treatment decision-making in elderly patients with metastatic melanoma.
| S-EPMC6306100 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Cutaneous Melanoma (CM) is an aggressive cancer whose incidence is increasing worldwide. However, the knowledge of its biology and genes driving cell growth and survival allowed to develop new drugs that have improved PFS and OS of advanced disease. Both BRAF targeting agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been adopted for the treatment of metastatic disease and the adjuvant setting. Several melanoma patients show innate or acquired drug-resistance and thus new strategies are required for overcoming this complication. New ICIs have been developed, and strategies of combination or sequencing are under investigation in ongoing clinical trials. In addition, pre-clinical data have demonstrated that many strategies induce the release of neoantigens within the tumor microenvironment, thus suggesting the combination of new agents with ICIs. Here, we review the ongoing strategies in advanced CM including a dedicated section on treatment of brain metastases.
| S-EPMC9302493 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Melanoma is the most aggressive and deadly type of skin cancer and is known for its poor prognosis as soon as metastasis occurs. Since 2011, new and effective therapies for metastatic melanoma have emerged, with US Food and Drug Administration approval of multiple targeted agents, such as V-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitors and multiple immunotherapy agents, such as cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 and anti-programmed cell death protein 1/ligand 1 blockade. Based on insight into the respective advantages of the above two strategies, the present article provided a review of clinical trials of the application of targeted therapy and immunotherapy, as well as novel approaches of their combinations for the treatment of metastatic melanoma in recent years, with a focus on upcoming initiatives to improve the efficacy of these treatment approaches for metastatic melanoma.
| S-EPMC10407994 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceClinical trials have shown an overall survival (OS) benefit associated with first-line immunotherapy (IT) and combination targeted therapy (TT) and IT regimens compared with TT among patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Generalizability of these findings in a real-world cohort outside of a clinical trial setting is unclear.ObjectiveTo assess the association of first-line TT, IT, and combination TT and IT regimens with OS in a real-world cohort of patients with metastatic clear cell RCC.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective propensity-matched cohort study identified 5872 patients with metastatic clear cell RCC in the National Cancer Database from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2017, who received first-line TT, IT, or combination TT and IT and were not treated on a clinical trial protocol. Patients were stratified by first-line systemic treatment. Statistical analysis was conducted from October 1 to December 1, 2020.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was OS from the date of diagnosis to death or censoring at last follow-up. After 1:1:1 nearest-neighbor caliper matching of propensity scores, survival analyses were conducted using Cox proportional hazards regression and Kaplan-Meier estimates.ResultsThe final study population included 5872 patients (TT group: n = 4755 [81%]; 3332 men [70%]; median age, 64 years [interquartile range, 57-71 years]; IT group: n = 638 [11%]; 475 men [74%]; median age, 61 years [interquartile range, 54-69 years]; and combination TT and IT group: n = 479 [8%]; 321 men [67%]; median age, 62 years [interquartile range, 55-69 years]), and the matched cohort included 1437 patients (479 per treatment group). Patients in the IT and combination TT and IT groups were younger than those in the TT group, had fewer comorbid conditions (Charlson-Deyo score of 0, 480 of 638 [75%] in the TT group, 356 of 479 [74%] in the IT group, and 3273 of 4755 [69%] in the combination TT and IT group), and were more often treated at academic centers (315 of 638 [49%], 216 of 479 [45%], and 1935 of 4755 [41%], respectively). Both first-line IT and combination TT and IT were associated with improved OS compared with first-line TT for patients with metastatic clear cell RCC (IT group: hazard ratio [HR], 0.60 [95% CI, 0.48-0.75]; P < .001; combination TT and IT group: HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.60-0.91]; P = .005). No survival difference was seen between the IT and combination TT and IT groups (combination TT and IT: HR, 1.24 [95% CI, 0.98-1.56]; P = .08).Conclusions and relevanceThis study suggests that both first-line IT and combination TT and IT were associated with improved OS compared with first-line TT for patients with metastatic clear cell RCC. These findings are similar to those identified in recently reported clinical trials, lending confidence to the broader applicability of these findings outside of a clinical trial setting.
| S-EPMC8150693 | biostudies-literature