Dataset Information

Efficacy and predictors of response of lenalidomide and rituximab in patients with treatment-naive and relapsed CLL.

ABSTRACT: This phase 2 study was conducted to prospectively evaluate how clinical and biological factors correlate with outcome in patients with treatment-naive (TN) and relapsed (R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treated with lenalidomide and rituximab. Oral lenalidomide 10 mg was administered daily starting on day 9 of cycle 1. IV rituximab 375 mg/m2 was administered weekly during cycle 1 and every 4 weeks for cycles 3 to 12. Sequencing of a custom panel of 295 genes was performed in pretreatment bone marrow samples. The study included 61 patients with TN CLL and 59 with R CLL; the overall response rate (ORR) was 73% and 64%, respectively. A baseline ?2-microglobulin level <4 mg/L was associated with higher ORR in both groups (both, P = .03), and absence of mutations in the NOTCH signaling pathway showed a trend for association with higher ORR in R CLL (P = .10). Median PFS was 50 months in TN patients and 28 months in R patients. On multivariate analysis, age ?65 years (P = .02) was associated with shorter PFS in TN patients, whereas according to univariate analysis, >2 previous therapies (P = .02) was the only factor associated with shorter PFS in R patients. A trend for association between mutations in the NOTCH pathway and shorter PFS was observed in TN CLL (P = .15). Further exploration of the NOTCH pathway may help optimize the efficacy of this combination in patients with CLL. This study protocol was approved by the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center institutional review board and registered at clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT01446133).

SUBMITTER: Strati P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6517659 | biostudies-literature | 2019 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Efficacy and predictors of response of lenalidomide and rituximab in patients with treatment-naive and relapsed CLL.

Strati Paolo P Takahashi Koichi K Peterson Christine B CB Keating Michael J MJ Thompson Philip A PA Daver Naval G NG Jain Nitin N Burger Jan A JA Estrov Zeev Z O'Brien Susan M SM Kantarjian Hagop M HM Wierda William G WG Futreal P Andrew PA Ferrajoli Alessandra A

Blood advances 20190501 9

This phase 2 study was conducted to prospectively evaluate how clinical and biological factors correlate with outcome in patients with treatment-naive (TN) and relapsed (R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treated with lenalidomide and rituximab. Oral lenalidomide 10 mg was administered daily starting on day 9 of cycle 1. IV rituximab 375 mg/m<sup>2</sup> was administered weekly during cycle 1 and every 4 weeks for cycles 3 to 12. Sequencing of a custom panel of 295 genes was performed in pret ...[more]

PMID: 31076409

Similar Datasets

Project description:The randomized phase 3 LYM3001 trial in relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL) demonstrated higher overall (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates and prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) with bortezomib-rituximab versus rituximab. We report findings in high-risk patients (FL International Prognostic Index [FLIPI] score ?3, and high tumor burden by modified Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomas Folliculaires [GELF] criteria).Patients aged ?18 years with grade 1/2 FL, ?1 measurable lesion, and documented relapse or progression following prior therapy, rituximab-naïve or rituximab-sensitive, were enrolled at 164 centers in 29 countries across Europe, the Americas, and Asia-Pacific. Patients were randomized (1:1) to five 5-week cycles of bortezomib-rituximab (bortezomib 1.6 mg/m2, days 1, 8, 15, and 22, all cycles; rituximab 375 mg/m2, days 1, 8, 15, and 22, cycle 1, and day 1, cycles 2-5; N=336) or rituximab alone (N=340). Randomization was stratified by FLIPI score, prior rituximab, time since last dose of anti-lymphoma therapy, and geographical region. The primary endpoint of the study was PFS.103 bortezomib-rituximab and 98 rituximab patients had high-risk FL. The ORR was 59% versus 37% (p=0.002), the CR/CRu rate was 13% versus 6% (p=0.145), and the durable response rate was 45% versus 26% (p=0.008) with bortezomib-rituximab versus rituximab. Median PFS was 9.5 versus 6.7 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.667, p=0.012) with bortezomib-rituximab versus rituximab; median time to progression was 10.9 versus 6.8 months (HR 0.656, p=0.009); median time to next anti-lymphoma treatment was 14.8 versus 9.1 months (HR 0.762, p=0.103); and the 1-year Overall Survival rate was 83.1% versus 76.6%. Overall, 51% of bortezomib-rituximab and 32% of rituximab patients reported grade ?3 adverse events, including neutropenia (18%, 6%), anemia (4%, 5%), diarrhea (8%, 0%), thrombocytopenia (5%, 2%), and sensory neuropathy (1%, 0%).High-risk FL patients treated with bortezomib-rituximab had significantly higher ORR and longer PFS than patients receiving rituximab alone, with greater clinical benefit than in the overall study population; additional toxicity was acceptable and did not affect treatment feasibility.The phase 3 LYM3001 trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, with the identifier NCT00312845.

Dataset Information

Efficacy and predictors of response of lenalidomide and rituximab in patients with treatment-naive and relapsed CLL.

Publications

Efficacy and predictors of response of lenalidomide and rituximab in patients with treatment-naive and relapsed CLL.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets