Dataset Information

A Propensity-matched Survival Analysis: Do Simultaneous Liver-lung Transplant Recipients Need a Liver?

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:There is debate whether simultaneous lung-liver transplant (LLT) long-term outcomes warrant allocation of 2 organs to a single recipient. We hypothesized that LLT recipients would have improved posttransplant survival compared with matched single-organ lung recipients with an equivalent degree of liver dysfunction. METHODS:The Organ Procurement and Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing STAR file was queried for adult candidates for LLT and isolated lung transplantation from 2006 to 2016. Waitlist mortality and transplant odds were calculated for all candidates. Donor and recipient demographic characteristics were compiled and compared. The LLT recipients were matched 1:2 with a nearest neighbor method to single-organ lung recipients. Kaplan-Meier methods with log-rank test compared long-term survival between groups. Univariate regression was used to calculate the association of LLT and mortality within 6 months of transplant. A proportional hazards model was used to calculate risk-adjusted mortality after 6 months posttransplantation. RESULTS:Thirty-eight LLT patients were matched to 75 single-organ lung recipients. After matching, no differences in baseline demographics or liver function were observed between cohorts. Length of stay was significantly longer in LLT recipients compared to isolated lung recipients (45.89 days vs 22.44 days, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in survival probability between LLT and isolated lung transplant (1 y, 89.5% vs 86.7%; 5 y, 67.0% vs 64.6%; P = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS:After matching for patient characteristics and level of liver dysfunction, survival in simultaneous LLT was comparable to isolated lung transplantation. Although this population is unique, the clinical picture prompting liver transplant is not clear. National guidelines to better elucidate patient selection are needed.

SUBMITTER: Freischlag K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6520207 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A Propensity-matched Survival Analysis: Do Simultaneous Liver-lung Transplant Recipients Need a Liver?

Freischlag Kyle K Ezekian Brian B Schroder Paul M PM Mulvihill Michael S MS Cox Morgan L ML Hartwig Matthew G MG Knechtle Stuart S

Transplantation 20190801 8

<h4>Background</h4>There is debate whether simultaneous lung-liver transplant (LLT) long-term outcomes warrant allocation of 2 organs to a single recipient. We hypothesized that LLT recipients would have improved posttransplant survival compared with matched single-organ lung recipients with an equivalent degree of liver dysfunction.<h4>Methods</h4>The Organ Procurement and Transplant Network/United Network for Organ Sharing STAR file was queried for adult candidates for LLT and isolated lung tr ...[more]

PMID: 30444805

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background Urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common bacterial infection after kidney transplantation (KT), leading to unfavorable clinical and allograft outcomes. Gram-negative uropathogenic bacteria are frequently encountered especially extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant (ESC-R) Enterobacterales (EB), causing UTI early after KT. Methods A retrospective single transplant study was conducted between January 2016 and December 2019. We performed 1:1 nearest-neighbor propensity score matching without replacement using recipient age, recipient sex, induction, transplant year, human leukocyte antigen, cold ischemia time, and panel-reactive antibody before analyses. Cumulative incidence of ESC-R EB early (within 14 days after KT) UTI was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Risk factors for ESC-R EB early UTI were analyzed by a Cox proportional hazards model. Variables measured after transplantation were considered time-dependent covariates. Results We included 620 KT recipients (37% women; mean age ± SD, 43 ± 11 years). Overall, 64% and 76% received deceased-donor allograft and induction therapy. Sixty-five (10%) and 555 (90%) received carbapenems and cefuroxime peri-transplant prophylaxis, respectively. Early UTI occurred in 183 (30%) patients, 52% caused by ESC-R EB. Propensity score matching produced 65 well-balanced pairs. During a 14-day follow-up, the cumulative incidence of ESC-R EB early UTI was 5 and 28% in the carbapenems and cefuroxime groups, respectively (log-rank test = 0.003). Peri-transplant carbapenems prophylaxis was a protective factor against ESC-R EB after KT (hazard ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.05–0.64; p = 0.008). Clinical and allograft outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusions In the setting where ESC-R EB UTI is common among KT recipients, carbapenems peri-transplant prophylaxis could protect against the occurrence of early ESC-R EB UTI after KT. Further prospective studies should focus on this specific infection prevention strategy.

Dataset Information

A Propensity-matched Survival Analysis: Do Simultaneous Liver-lung Transplant Recipients Need a Liver?

Publications

A Propensity-matched Survival Analysis: Do Simultaneous Liver-lung Transplant Recipients Need a Liver?

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets