Dataset Information

Positive/retained SDHB immunostaining in renal cell carcinomas associated to germline SDHB-deficiency: case report.

ABSTRACT:

Background

According to WHO, succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient renal cell carcinoma is characterized by negative immunostaining for SDHB, which remains positive in non-tumor tissue despite germline mutations in the SDHB gene. We now report a patient with a SDHB mutation, c.166_170del (p.Pro56Tyrfs*5) who developed renal cell carcinomas with characteristic morphological features of SDH-deficient renal cell carcinoma but had positive SDHB immunostaining.

Case presentation

Within a 6-year period, the patient developed two different renal cell carcinomas, which had characteristic morphological features of SDH-deficient renal cell carcinoma (uniform cells characteristically displaying eosinophilic granular material intermixed with fewer cells exhibiting clear intracytoplasmic inclusions and bland centered nuclei) but displayed immunohistochemistry for SDHB with a cytoplasmic granular positivity (mitochondrial pattern) in tumor cells. For the second case, this was initially interpreted as positive by IHC, but on review some subtle differences were identified.

Conclusions

SDHB immunostaining may be positive in renal cell carcinoma associated to germline SDHB deficiency which have other typical morphological features. Immunohistochemistry interpretation may be complex.

SUBMITTER: Ugarte-Camara M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6521540 | biostudies-literature | 2019 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Positive/retained SDHB immunostaining in renal cell carcinomas associated to germline SDHB-deficiency: case report.

Ugarte-Camara Marina M Fernandez-Prado Raul R Lorda Isabel I Rossello Gabriela G Gonzalez-Enguita Carmen C Cannata-Ortiz Pablo P Ortiz Alberto A

Diagnostic pathology 20190515 1

<h4>Background</h4>According to WHO, succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient renal cell carcinoma is characterized by negative immunostaining for SDHB, which remains positive in non-tumor tissue despite germline mutations in the SDHB gene. We now report a patient with a SDHB mutation, c.166_170del (p.Pro56Tyrfs*5) who developed renal cell carcinomas with characteristic morphological features of SDH-deficient renal cell carcinoma but had positive SDHB immunostaining.<h4>Case presentation</h4>With ...[more]

PMID: 31092265

Similar Datasets

Project description:Carotid body tumor involving the succinate dehydrogenase subunit B (SDHB) variant reportedly had a higher frequency of metastasis than other variants of succinate dehydrogenase. However, the correlation between genotype and phenotype among patients with carotid body tumor with SDHB gene variant remains unclear. Thus, we present a case of carotid body tumor with neck lymph metastasis caused by a novel SDHB variant, which resulted in long-term disease-free survival achieved after surgery. A 43-year-old man presented to our hospital with a 2-year history of a painless neck mass. Based on the radiographic findings, the patient was diagnosed with carotid body tumor with a possible Shamblin type III tumor. Another mass was detected and suspected to be a lymph node metastasis. The patient underwent resection of the tumor and lymph nodes. The common carotid artery, internal carotid artery, external carotid artery, internal jugular vein, vagal nerve, and hypoglossal nerve were resected with the tumor. Histopathological examination revealed a paraganglioma. The histological findings of the lymph nodes were similar to those of the carotid body tumor and were confirmed to be metastases of paraganglioma. To analyze the germline SDHx variant, a nonsense variant was detected in the SDHB gene at exon 2, c. 136C > T, p. Arg46*. During the follow-up 80 months after surgery, the patient exhibited no signs of recurrence, metastasis, or development of paragangliomas in other organs. This was the first case of carotid body tumor accompanied by neck metastasis caused by a germline nonsense SDHB variant at exon 2, c. 136C > T, p. Arg46*. Carotid body tumor with neck lymph metastasis caused by this nonsense variant could achieve long-term disease-free survival after surgery. Gene analysis, including SDHB variant, should be performed to predict the prognosis and future risk of metastasis. Genetic testing of SDHB may give a crucial information for the treatment and follow-up strategies of carotid body tumor.Supplementary informationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13691-021-00522-x.

Project description:Abstract Background: SDHB immunostaining can be used to functionally characterize SDH status in PCC and PGL. Assessing SDHB expression on tumors is inexpensive and can be used as an alternative to genetic testing. More importantly, assessment of SDHB expression can be of value in interpreting Variant of Unknown Significance (VUS) in SDH related genes. Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of SDHB immunostaining as an initial screening tool in identifying germline SDH mutations and the value of SDHB assessment in the clinical characterization of our patient cohort. Design: Prospective and retrospective analysis of 57 randomly selected patients with PCC and PGL from the year 1997 to 2018. Setting: In our institution on patients referred from London and South East England including Kent, Surrey and Sussex. Patients: Predominant Caucasian Population with diverse ethnicities. 57 patients - 34 patients (14M & 20F) with PGL and 25 with PCC (15M &10F). Age (mean: 41years at diagnosis with range 9-80 years). 2 patients had both PCC & PGL and multifocal PGLs were identified in few patients with SDHD and SDHB mutation. There were 65 tumors in total included in this study. Intervention: Resected tumor SDHB immunostaining with Sigma prestige antibodies (HPA002868 100UL - Anti-SDHB Rabbit monoclonal antibody) at a dilution of 1:1000. Genetic testing performed on predominant candidate genes. Main outcome measures: Concordance of SDHB loss of expression with presence of pathogenic mutation in candidate SDH genes. Secondarily, to explore SDHB immunostaining in our patient cohort with VUS in candidate genes. Results: SDHB immunostaining was negative in 22/23 tumors in patients with confirmed SDH mutation (false negative = 1 SDHB PCC where it was weak (+)). The staining was positive in 23/24 sporadic tumors, 10/11 VUS (in SDH, MAX and TMEM genes - both PCCs & PGLs), 2/2 PCCs in MEN-2, 2/2 PCCs in NF-1 and 2/3 PCCs in VHL. The negative immunostaining in 1 PGL with VUS in SDHB may imply lack of SDH enzyme activity and hence suggestive of a pathological mutation. The sensitivity is 96% and the specificity approaches 93% if the weak positive SDHB immunostaining with SDHD and VHL tumors were to be considered concordant. The concordance was 95% in the PGL group alone. Conclusions: SDHB immunostaining is a cost effective addition to PGL and PCC tumor characterization and performs with high sensitivity and specificity. SDH functional characterization has an important role in the management of patients who do not satisfy the current criteria for genetic testing (UK genetics testing directory for PCC/PGL). 18% of patients had VUS in a SDH related gene and we have found that SDHB immunostaining provided helpful information to inform follow-up and cascade screening decisions in this group.

Dataset Information

Positive/retained SDHB immunostaining in renal cell carcinomas associated to germline SDHB-deficiency: case report.

Background

Case presentation

Conclusions

Publications

Positive/retained SDHB immunostaining in renal cell carcinomas associated to germline SDHB-deficiency: case report.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets