Dataset Information

Suture length to wound length ratio in 175 small animal abdominal midline closures.

ABSTRACT: Experimental and human studies have reported the advantages of a suture length to wound length (SL:WL) ratio greater than 4:1 in midline abdominal closure. This is achieved when the tissue bite (TB) is equal to or larger than the stitch interval (SI). Although TB and SI values are recommended in some textbooks, SL:WL ratios are rarely reported in veterinary textbooks. Additionally, no clinical data regarding these parameters could be found in small animals. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the SL:WL ratio of midline laparotomy closure in dogs and cats performed by surgeons with different levels of expertise and to compare the findings with current textbook recommendations. Midline laparotomy incisions of 100 dogs and 75 cats were closed in continuous pattern by diplomates and residents of both the European College of Veterinary Surgeons (ECVS) and the European College of Animal Reproduction (ECAR). The mean SL:WL ratio was 2.5 ± 0.7:1. The surgeons´ level of experience and the species and body weights of the animals did not have any significant influence on the SL:WL ratio. A moderate negative correlation was observed between the mean SI to mean TB (SI:TB) ratio and the SL:WL ratio. In this study, the mean SI matched the textbook recommendations both in feline and canine species, whereas the TB in cats was different. In this study, the SL:WL ratio was less than 4:1 without apparent complications. Because of the low prevalence of incisional hernia in dogs and cats larger studies are necessary to evaluate clinical significance of the presented data.

SUBMITTER: Winter V

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6527205 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Suture length to wound length ratio in 175 small animal abdominal midline closures.

Winter Verena V Degasperi Brigitte B Bockstahler Barbara B Dupré Gilles G

PloS one 20190520 5

Experimental and human studies have reported the advantages of a suture length to wound length (SL:WL) ratio greater than 4:1 in midline abdominal closure. This is achieved when the tissue bite (TB) is equal to or larger than the stitch interval (SI). Although TB and SI values are recommended in some textbooks, SL:WL ratios are rarely reported in veterinary textbooks. Additionally, no clinical data regarding these parameters could be found in small animals. Therefore, the aim of this study was t ...[more]

PMID: 31107892

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceSurgeons have varying opinions on the ideal cutaneous suture spacing for optimal cosmetic outcomes. To date, no studies concerning the effect of suture spacing on cosmetic outcomes exist in the literature.ObjectiveTo compare outcomes and wound cosmesis achieved with running cutaneous sutures spaced 2 vs 5 mm apart.Design, setting, and participantsThis randomized clinical trial was conducted at the University of California, Davis dermatology clinic from November 28, 2017, to June 15, 2018. Fifty-six patients 18 years or older with surgical fusiform wounds (from Mohs procedure or surgical excision) on the head or neck with assumed closure lengths of at least 3 cm were screened. Six patients were excluded, 50 patients were enrolled, and 48 patients were followed up.InterventionsFifty surgical fusiform wounds were randomized to running cuticular closure with 2-mm spacing on half and 5-mm spacing on half.Main outcomes and measuresAt 3 months, patients and 2 masked observers evaluated each scar using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS).ResultsA total of 50 patients (mean [SD] age, 71.1 [11.4] years; 43 [86%] male; 50 [100%] white) were enrolled in the study. The mean (SD) sum of the POSAS observer component scores was 10.7 (4.3) for the 2-mm interval side and 10.8 (3.5) for the 5-mm side at 3 months (P = .77). No statistically significant difference was found in the mean (SD) sum of the patient component for the POSAS score between the 2-mm interval side (10.2 [4.7]) and the 5-mm interval side (11.5 [6.4]) at 3 months (P = .24). No statistically significant difference was observed in mean (SD) scar width between the 2-mm side (0.9 [0.6] mm) and the 5-mm side (0.8 [0.4] mm; P = .15).Conclusions and relevanceNo statistically significant difference in wound cosmesis or total complications were noted between running cuticular sutures spaced 2 vs 5 mm apart. Both suturing techniques resulted in similar cosmetic outcomes and complication rates. Surgeons may want to consider whether the extra time involved in placing very closely spaced cuticular sutures is worthwhile.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03330041.

Project description:To compare wound complication rates after skin closure with staples and subcuticular suture in obese gynecology patients undergoing laparotomy through a midline vertical incision.In this randomized controlled trial, women with body mass indexes (BMIs) of 30 or greater undergoing surgery by a gynecologic oncologist through a midline vertical incision were randomized to skin closure with staples or subcuticular 4-0 monofilament suture. The primary outcome was the rate of wound complication, defined as the presence of a wound breakdown, or infection, within 8 weeks postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included operative time, Stony Brook scar cosmetic score, and patient satisfaction. A sample size of 162 was planned to detect a 50% reduction in wound complications. At planned interim review (n=82), there was no significant difference in primary outcome.Between 2013 and 2016, 163 women were analyzed, including 84 who received staples and 79 suture. Women who received staples were older (mean age 59 compared with 57 years), had lower mean BMI (37.3 compared with 38.9), and fewer benign indications for surgery (22 compared with 27). There were no differences in wound complication rates between staple compared with suture skin closure (28 [33%] compared with 25 [32%], relative risk 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-1.64). Women with staples reported worse median cosmetic scores (four of five compared with five of five, P<.001), darker scar color (37 [49%] compared with 13 [18%], relative risk 2.69, 95% CI 1.57-4.63), and more skin marks (30 [40%] compared with three [4%], relative risk 9.47, 95% CI 3.02-29.65) compared with women with suture closure. There was no group difference regarding satisfaction with their scar. Stepwise multivariate analysis revealed BMI (odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% CI 1.07-1.20), maximum postoperative glucose (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.01), and cigarette smoking (OR 4.96, 95% CI 1.32-18.71) were correlates of wound complication.Closure of midline vertical skin incisions with subcuticular suture does not reduce surgical site wound complications compared with staples in obese gynecology patients.ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01977612.

Project description:BackgroundBased on a recent meta-analysis, a continuous suture technique with a suture to wound length ratio of at least 4:1, using a slowly absorbable monofilament suture material, is recommended for primary median laparotomy closure. Incisional hernia, which develops in 9 to 20% of patients, remains the major complication of abdominal wall closure. Current clinical data indicate that the incidence of incisional hernias increases by 60% between the first and the third year after median laparotomy, implicating that a follow-up period of 1 year postoperatively is too short with regard to this common complication. Trauma to the abdominal wall can be reduced by improvements in suture technique as well as suture material. Several factors, such as stitch length, suture tension, elasticity, and tensile strength of the suture material are discussed and currently under investigation. A Swedish randomized controlled trial showed a significant reduction in the incisional hernia rate by shortening the stitch length. However, a non-elastic thread was used and follow-up ended after 12 months. Therefore, we designed a multicenter, international, double-blinded, randomized trial to analyze the influence of stitch length, using an elastic, extra-long term absorbable monofilament suture, on the long term clinical outcome of abdominal wall closure.MethodsIn total, 468 patients undergoing an elective, median laparotomy will be randomly allocated to either the short stitch or the long stitch suture technique for abdominal wall closure in a 1:1 ratio. Centers located in Germany and Austria will participate. The primary endpoint measure is the incisional hernia rate 1 year postoperatively, as verified by ultrasound. The frequency of short term and long term complications as well as costs, length of hospital stay and patients' quality of life (EQ-5D-5 L) will be considered as secondary parameters. Following hospital discharge, patients will be examined after 30 days and 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery.DiscussionThis study will provide further evidence on whether a short stitch suture technique in combination with an elastic, extra-long term absorbable monofilament suture can prevent incisional hernias in the long term, compared with the long stitch suture technique.Trial registrationNCT01965249 .

Project description:IntroductionA mini-laparotomy for colorectal cancer (CRC) has been reported to shorten postoperative ileus (POI) and hospital stay. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) plays a role in intestinal tissue inflammation, leading to POI. This study investigated the effects of abdominal wounds and IL-6 levels on POI in patients having CRC surgery.Materials and methodsForty-three patients with CRC underwent bowel resection. Serum samples were collected preoperatively and at 2, 24, and 48 h after surgery for cytokine quantification by ELISA. Clinical data, including time from surgery to first passage of flatus and postoperative hospital stay, demographic and pathological data, and routine blood tests, were compared statistically with abdominal wound length and the postoperative increments of cytokines (designated as Δ).ResultsThe length of the abdominal wound showed a significant correlation with clinical variables (length of operation time, time of first flatus passage, and length of postoperative hospital stay) and cytokine variables (IL-6(Δ2 h), IL-8(Δ2 h) and IL-10(Δ2 h). Linear regression analysis showed that the abdominal wound length significantly influenced the operation time, time of first flatus passage, and length of postoperative hospital stay (p < 0.001). The length of the abdominal wound showed a significant influence on the IL-6(Δ2 h) and IL-8(Δ2 h) (p < 0.001, respectively) but no influence on IL-10(Δ2 h). IL-6(Δ2 h), but not IL-8(Δ2 h), significantly influenced the time to first flatus passage and length of hospital stay (p = 0.007, p = 0.006, respectively). The mini-laparotomy approach (wound length <7 cm) led to significantly shortened operation time, time of first flatus passage, length of postoperative stay (p = 0.004, p = 0.003, p = 0.006, respectively) as well as reduced postoperative increment of IL-6(Δ2 h) (p = 0.015). The mini-laparotomy for anterior resection surgery significantly influenced operation time, time of first passage of flatus, length of postoperative stay, and IL-6(Δ2 h).ConclusionOur study is the first to report the complex interaction among the length of the abdominal wound, IL-6 serum level, recovery of the first passage of flatus, and postoperative hospital stay. These results suggest that smaller abdominal wounds and smaller postoperative IL-6 increments were associated with faster recovery of flatus passage and shorter hospital stays.

Dataset Information

Suture length to wound length ratio in 175 small animal abdominal midline closures.

Publications

Suture length to wound length ratio in 175 small animal abdominal midline closures.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets