Dataset Information

The utility of lesion classification in predicting language and treatment outcomes in chronic stroke-induced aphasia.

ABSTRACT: Stroke recovery models can improve prognostication of therapy response in patients with chronic aphasia, yet quantifying the effect of lesion on recovery is challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of lesion classification via gray matter (GM)-only versus combined GM plus white matter (WM) metrics and to determine structural measures associated with aphasia severity, naming skills, and treatment outcomes. Thirty-four patients with chronic aphasia due to left hemisphere infarct completed T1-weighted and DTI scans and language assessments prior to receiving a 12-week naming treatment. GM metrics included the amount of spared tissue within five cortical masks. WM integrity was indexed by spared tissue and fractional anisotropy (FA) from four homologous left and right association tracts. Clustering of GM-only and GM?+?WM metrics via k-medoids yielded four patient clusters that captured two lesion characteristics, size and location. Linear regression models revealed that both GM-only and GM?+?WM clustering predicted baseline aphasia severity and naming skills, but only GM?+?WM clustering predicted treatment outcomes. Spearman correlations revealed that without controlling for lesion volume, the majority of left hemisphere metrics were related to language measures. However, adjusting for lesion volume, no relationships with aphasia severity remained significant. FA from two ventral left WM tracts was related to naming and treatment success, independent of lesion size. In sum, lesion volume and GM metrics are sufficient predictors of overall aphasia severity in patients with chronic stroke, whereas diffusion metrics reflecting WM tract integrity may add predictive power to language recovery outcomes after rehabilitation.

SUBMITTER: Meier EL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6527352 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The utility of lesion classification in predicting language and treatment outcomes in chronic stroke-induced aphasia.

Meier Erin L EL Johnson Jeffrey P JP Pan Yue Y Kiran Swathi S

Brain imaging and behavior 20191201 6

Stroke recovery models can improve prognostication of therapy response in patients with chronic aphasia, yet quantifying the effect of lesion on recovery is challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of lesion classification via gray matter (GM)-only versus combined GM plus white matter (WM) metrics and to determine structural measures associated with aphasia severity, naming skills, and treatment outcomes. Thirty-four patients with chronic aphasia due to left hemisphere infarct compl ...[more]

PMID: 31093842

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAphasia therapy is an effective approach to improve language function in chronic aphasia. However, it remains unclear what prognostic factors facilitate therapy response at the individual level. Here, we utilized data from the POLAR (Predicting Outcomes of Language Rehabilitation in Aphasia) trial to (a) determine therapy-induced change in confrontation naming and long-term maintenance of naming gains and (b) examine the extent to which aphasia severity, age, education, time postonset, and cognitive reserve predict naming gains at 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months posttherapy.MethodA total of 107 participants with chronic (≥ 12 months poststroke) aphasia underwent extensive case history, cognitive-linguistic testing, and a neuroimaging workup prior to receiving 6 weeks of impairment-based language therapy. Therapy-induced change in naming performance (measured as raw change on the 175-item Philadelphia Naming Test [PNT]) was assessed 1 week after therapy and at follow-up time points 1 month and 6 months after therapy completion. Change in naming performance over time was evaluated using paired t tests, and linear mixed-effects models were constructed to examine the association between prognostic factors and therapy outcomes.ResultsNaming performance was improved by 5.9 PNT items (Cohen's d = 0.56, p < .001) 1 week after therapy and by 6.4 (d = 0.66, p < .001) and 7.5 (d = 0.65, p < .001) PNT items at 1 month and 6 months after therapy completion, respectively. Aphasia severity emerged as the strongest predictor of naming improvement recovery across time points; mild (ß = 5.85-9.02) and moderate (ß = 9.65-11.54) impairment predicted better recovery than severe (ß = 1.31-3.37) and very severe (ß = 0.20-0.32) aphasia. Age was an emergent prognostic factor for recovery 1 month (ß = -0.14) and 6 months (ß = -0.20) after therapy, and time postonset (ß = -0.05) was associated with retention of naming gains at 6 months posttherapy.ConclusionsThese results suggest that therapy-induced naming improvement is predictable based on several easily measurable prognostic factors. Broadly speaking, these results suggest that prognostication procedures in aphasia therapy can be improved and indicate that personalization of therapy is a realistic goal in the near future.Supplemental materialhttps://doi.org/10.23641/asha.22141829.

Project description:BackgroundAphasia is an acquired language impairment following brain damage that affects some or all language modalities: expression and understanding of speech, reading, and writing. Approximately one third of people who have a stroke experience aphasia.ObjectivesTo assess the effects of speech and language therapy (SLT) for aphasia following stroke.Search methodsWe searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched 9 September 2015), CENTRAL (2015, Issue 5) and other Cochrane Library Databases (CDSR, DARE, HTA, to 22 September 2015), MEDLINE (1946 to September 2015), EMBASE (1980 to September 2015), CINAHL (1982 to September 2015), AMED (1985 to September 2015), LLBA (1973 to September 2015), and SpeechBITE (2008 to September 2015). We also searched major trials registers for ongoing trials including ClinicalTrials.gov (to 21 September 2015), the Stroke Trials Registry (to 21 September 2015), Current Controlled Trials (to 22 September 2015), and WHO ICTRP (to 22 September 2015). In an effort to identify further published, unpublished, and ongoing trials we also handsearched the International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders (1969 to 2005) and reference lists of relevant articles, and we contacted academic institutions and other researchers. There were no language restrictions.Selection criteriaRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SLT (a formal intervention that aims to improve language and communication abilities, activity and participation) versus no SLT; social support or stimulation (an intervention that provides social support and communication stimulation but does not include targeted therapeutic interventions); or another SLT intervention (differing in duration, intensity, frequency, intervention methodology or theoretical approach).Data collection and analysisWe independently extracted the data and assessed the quality of included trials. We sought missing data from investigators.Main resultsWe included 57 RCTs (74 randomised comparisons) involving 3002 participants in this review (some appearing in more than one comparison). Twenty-seven randomised comparisons (1620 participants) assessed SLT versus no SLT; SLT resulted in clinically and statistically significant benefits to patients' functional communication (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.06 to 0.49, P = 0.01), reading, writing, and expressive language, but (based on smaller numbers) benefits were not evident at follow-up. Nine randomised comparisons (447 participants) assessed SLT with social support and stimulation; meta-analyses found no evidence of a difference in functional communication, but more participants withdrew from social support interventions than SLT. Thirty-eight randomised comparisons (1242 participants) assessed two approaches to SLT. Functional communication was significantly better in people with aphasia that received therapy at a high intensity, high dose, or over a long duration compared to those that received therapy at a lower intensity, lower dose, or over a shorter period of time. The benefits of a high intensity or a high dose of SLT were confounded by a significantly higher dropout rate in these intervention groups. Generally, trials randomised small numbers of participants across a range of characteristics (age, time since stroke, and severity profiles), interventions, and outcomes.Authors' conclusionsOur review provides evidence of the effectiveness of SLT for people with aphasia following stroke in terms of improved functional communication, reading, writing, and expressive language compared with no therapy. There is some indication that therapy at high intensity, high dose or over a longer period may be beneficial. HIgh-intensity and high dose interventions may not be acceptable to all.

Dataset Information

The utility of lesion classification in predicting language and treatment outcomes in chronic stroke-induced aphasia.

Publications

The utility of lesion classification in predicting language and treatment outcomes in chronic stroke-induced aphasia.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets