Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Accuracy of consumer-level and research-grade activity trackers in ambulatory settings in older adults.


ABSTRACT: Wrist-worn activity trackers have experienced a tremendous growth lately and studies on the accuracy of mainstream trackers used by older adults are needed. This study explores the performance of six trackers (Fitbit Charge2, Garmin VivoSmart HR+, Philips Health Watch, Withings Pulse Ox, ActiGraph GT9X-BT, Omron HJ-72OITC) for estimating: steps, travelled distance, and heart-rate measurements for a cohort of older adults. Eighteen older adults completed a structured protocol involving walking tasks, simulated household activities, and sedentary activities. Less standardized activities were also included, such as: dusting, using a walking aid, or playing cards, in order to simulate real-life scenarios. Wrist-mounted and chest/waist-mounted devices were used. Gold-standards included treadmill, ECG-based chest strap, direct observation or video recording according to the activity and parameter. Every tracker showed a decreasing accuracy with slower walking speed, which resulted in a significant step under-counting. A large mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was found for every monitor at slower walking speeds with the lowest reported MAPE at 2 km/h being 7.78%, increasing to 20.88% at 1.5 km/h, and 44.53% at 1 km/h. During household activities, the MAPE climbing up/down-stairs ranged from 8.38-19.3% and 10.06-19.01% (dominant and non-dominant arm), respectively. Waist-worn devices showed a more uniform performance. However, unstructured activities (e.g. dusting, playing cards), and using a walking aid represent a challenge for all wrist-worn trackers as evidenced by large MAPE (> 57.66% for dusting, > 67.32% when using a walking aid). Poor performance in travelled distance estimation was also evident during walking at low speeds and climbing up/down-stairs (MAPE > 71.44% and > 48.3%, respectively). Regarding heart-rate measurement, there was no significant difference (p-values > 0.05) in accuracy between trackers placed on the dominant or non-dominant arm. Concordant with existing literature, while the mean error was limited (between -3.57 bpm and 4.21 bpm), a single heart-rate measurement could be underestimated up to 30 beats-per-minute. This study showed a number of limitations of consumer-level wrist-based activity trackers for older adults. Therefore caution is required when used, in healthcare or in research settings, to measure activity in older adults.

SUBMITTER: Tedesco S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6529154 | biostudies-literature | 2019

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Accuracy of consumer-level and research-grade activity trackers in ambulatory settings in older adults.

Tedesco Salvatore S   Sica Marco M   Ancillao Andrea A   Timmons Suzanne S   Barton John J   O'Flynn Brendan B  

PloS one 20190521 5


Wrist-worn activity trackers have experienced a tremendous growth lately and studies on the accuracy of mainstream trackers used by older adults are needed. This study explores the performance of six trackers (Fitbit Charge2, Garmin VivoSmart HR+, Philips Health Watch, Withings Pulse Ox, ActiGraph GT9X-BT, Omron HJ-72OITC) for estimating: steps, travelled distance, and heart-rate measurements for a cohort of older adults. Eighteen older adults completed a structured protocol involving walking ta  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9840097 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8081159 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7023914 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7218601 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5887043 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7463409 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7268004 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5707431 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10051559 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11349177 | biostudies-literature