Dataset Information

How Generalizable Are Cardiovascular Outcome Trials of Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 Inhibitors? A National Database Study: Study Protocol.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are oral antihyperglycemic agents for the treatment of people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Two recent cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs), the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial and CANVAS Program, have demonstrated that SGLT2 inhibitors have cardiovascular benefit in high-risk cardiovascular patients. The aim of our study will be to identify the prevalence of patients in an English primary care setting with the equivalent cardiovascular risk profile to those included in each of four SGLT2 inhibitor CVOTs: CANVAS, DECLARE, EMPA-REG, and VERTIS CV.

Methods

Routinely collected primary care data from the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC) network database will be used. We will perform a cross-sectional analysis to calculate the prevalence of people that have equivalent cardiovascular risk to participants included in each of the four above-mentioned SGLT2 inhibitor CVOTs. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the subgroups will also be compared with participants in each trial. The study cohort will include people with T2DM in the RCGP RSC dataset. Subgroups of people will be identified using Read codes that most closely match the inclusion criteria of each trial. Descriptive statistics will be used to report the characteristics of people at high cardiovascular risk and compared against those of people in each CVOT.

Planned outputs

Findings from the study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal to report the applicability of each SGLT2 inhibitor trial to real-world clinical practice.

Funding

AstraZeneca UK Limited.

SUBMITTER: Hinton W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6531500 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo compare the risk of cardiovascular events between sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors among people with type 2 diabetes in a real world context of clinical practice.DesignMulti-database retrospective cohort study using a prevalent new user design with subsequent meta-analysis.SettingCanadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies (CNODES), with administrative healthcare databases from seven Canadian provinces and the United Kingdom, 2013-18.Population209 867 new users of a SGLT2 inhibitor matched to 209 867 users of a DPP-4 inhibitor on time conditional propensity score and followed for a mean of 0.9 years.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, a composite of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, or cardiovascular death). Secondary outcomes were the individual components of MACE, heart failure, and all cause mortality. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate site specific adjusted hazards ratios and 95% confidence intervals, comparing use of SGLT2 inhibitors with use of DPP-4 inhibitors in an as treated approach. Site specific results were pooled using random effects meta-analysis.ResultsCompared with DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT2 inhibitors were associated with decreased risks of MACE (incidence rate per 1000 person years: 11.4 v 16.5; hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.69 to 0.84), myocardial infarction (5.1 v 6.4; 0.82, 0.70 to 0.96), cardiovascular death (3.9 v 7.7; 0.60, 0.54 to 0.67), heart failure (3.1 v 7.7; 0.43, 0.37 to 0.51), and all cause mortality (8.7 v 17.3; 0.60, 0.54 to 0.67). SGLT2 inhibitors had more modest benefits for ischaemic stroke (2.6 v 3.5; 0.85, 0.72 to 1.01). Similar benefits for MACE were observed with canagliflozin (0.79, 0.66 to 0.94), dapagliflozin (0.73, 0.63 to 0.85), and empagliflozin (0.77, 0.68 to 0.87).ConclusionsIn this large observational study conducted in a real world clinical practice context, the short term use of SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with a decreased risk of cardiovascular events compared with the use of DPP-4 inhibitors.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03939624.

Project description:Background and purpose: Several clinical trials have indicated that the use of canagliflozin increases the risk of lower extremity amputation. Although the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has withdrawn its black box warning about amputation risk for canagliflozin, the risk still exists. We sought to estimate the association between hypoglycemic medications, especially sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), and adverse events (AEs) before the irreversible outcome of amputation as a promising early warning, based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data. Methods: Publicly available FAERS data were analyzed using a reporting odds ratio (ROR) method and validated by a Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN) method. The developing trend of the ROR was investigated by a series of calculations based on the accumulation of data in the FAERS database quarter by quarter. Results: Ketoacidosis, infection, peripheral ischemia, renal impairment, and inflammation including osteomyelitis might be more likely to occur among users of SGLT2is, especially canagliflozin. Osteomyelitis and cellulitis are AEs unique to canagliflozin. Among 2,888 osteomyelitis-related reports referring to hypoglycemic medications, 2,333 cases were associated with SGLT2is, with canagliflozin accounting for 2,283 of these cases and generating an ROR value of 360.89 and a lower limit of information component (IC025) of 7.79. No BCPNN-positive signal could be generated for drugs other than insulin and canagliflozin. Reports suggesting that insulin could generate BCPNN-positive signals span from 2004 to 2021, whereas reports with BCPNN-positive signals emerged only since the second quarter (Q2) of 2017, 4 years since the approval of SGLT2is in Q2 of 2013, for canagliflozin and drug groups containing canagliflozin. Conclusion: This data-mining investigation revealed a strong association between canagliflozin treatment and developing osteomyelitis that might be a crucial forewarning to lower extremity amputation. Further studies with updated data are needed to better characterize the risk of osteomyelitis associated with SGLT2is.

Project description:BackgroundThe clinical benefit of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors for preventing and treating cardiovascular events remains controversial. We aimed to study the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes and safety events, giving particular attention to the benefits in subgroups of patients with different diseases.MethodRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting cardiovascular outcomes following the administration of SGLT2 inhibitors and placebo were included in this study. Cardiovascular outcomes included all-cause death, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). We also focused on the cardiovascular benefits of SGLT2 inhibitor application in subgroups of patients with different diseases, including type 2 diabetes (T2D), heart failure (HF), high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ACD), diagnosed ACD, and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Safety events associated with SGLT2 inhibitors, including acute kidney injury (AKI), diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), hypoglycemia, urinary tract infection, thromboembolic event, bone fracture, volume depletion, and amputation, were also reported.ResultsThis meta-analysis included 15 RCTs with 78,212 participants. SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of all-cause death (RR 0.89; 95% CI: 0.85-0.94; I2 = 32%; p < 0.01), CV death (RR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.82-0.93; I2 = 11%; p < 0.01), MACEs (RR 0.89; 95% CI: 0.84-0.94; I2 = 46%; p < 0.01), HHF (RR 0.70; 95% CI: 0.66-0.74; I2 = 0%; p < 0.01), and AKI (RR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.73-0.90; I2 = 0%; p < 0.01) but increased the risk of DKA (RR 2.56; 95% CI: 1.72-3.80; I2 = 0%; p < 0.01). However, no apparent benefit in MI and stroke was observed between the SGLT2 inhibitor and control groups. SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of all-cause death, MACEs, CV death, and HHF in diabetic patients; reduced the risk of all-cause death, MACEs, CV death, MI, and HHF in primary prevention; reduced the risk of all-cause death, CV death, and HHF in patients with ACD and HF; and reduced the risk of MACEs, CV death, and HHF in patients with CKD.ConclusionSGLT2 inhibitors have a positive effect in reducing the risk of all-cause death, CV death, MACE, HHF, and AKI and increasing the risk of DKA. The application of SGLT2 inhibitors in the primary prevention of ACD also has certain clinical benefits in reducing MI.Systematic review registration[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42022306490].