Dataset Information

Objective evaluation of clinical outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for middle-third early gastric cancer.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:Laparoscopic-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (LAPPG) is a minimally invasive function-preserving surgery for early gastric cancer. This study was designed to investigate the clinical outcomes between LAPPG and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) by objective evaluation. METHODS:A total 167 pT1N0M0 gastric cancer patients underwent LAPPG(n?=?70) and LADG(n?=?97) were retrospectively analyzed. By evaluating the functional advantages, objective short-term and one year follow-up outcomes were compared. RESULTS:There is no significant difference in perioperative clinical characteristics as well as pathologic results between LAPPG and LADG group while the cost is higher in latter(p?=?0.004). The Clavien-Dindo grade II or higher complications were 15.7 and 13.4% in LAPPG and LADG group respectively(p?=?0.824). In one year follow-up, nutritional status was significantly better in LAPPG group accompanied by better pylorus function preserving. CONCLUSION:LAPPG is an acceptable surgical procedure for pT1N0M0 middle portion gastric cancer patients in terms of nutritional and economic advantage. TRIAL REGISTRATION:Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( ChiCTR-PIC-17012358 , Date of Registration:2017-08-14).

SUBMITTER: Xia X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6532154 | biostudies-literature | 2019 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Objective evaluation of clinical outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for middle-third early gastric cancer.

Xia Xiang X Xu Jia J Zhu Chunchao C Cao Hui H Yu Fengrong F Zhao Gang G

BMC cancer 20190522 1

<h4>Background</h4>Laparoscopic-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (LAPPG) is a minimally invasive function-preserving surgery for early gastric cancer. This study was designed to investigate the clinical outcomes between LAPPG and laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) by objective evaluation.<h4>Methods</h4>A total 167 pT1N0M0 gastric cancer patients underwent LAPPG(n = 70) and LADG(n = 97) were retrospectively analyzed. By evaluating the functional advantages, objective short-ter ...[more]

PMID: 31117975

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:An increasing amount of attention has been paid to minimally invasive function-preserving gastrectomy, with an increase in incidence of early gastric cancer in the upper stomach. This study aimed to compare oncological outcomes, surgical stress, and nutritional status between robot-assisted proximal gastrectomy (RAPG) and laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy (LAPG). METHODS:Eighty-nine patients were enrolled in this retrospective study between November 2011 and December 2013. Among them, 27 patients underwent RAPG and 62 underwent LAPG. Perioperative parameters, surgical stress, nutritional status, disease-free survival, and overall survival were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS:Sex, age, and comorbidity were similar in the RAPG and LAPG groups. There were also similar perioperative outcomes regarding operation time, complications, and length of hospital stay between the groups. The reflux esophagitis rates following RAPG and LAPG were 18.5% and 14.5%, respectively ( P = .842). However, patients in the RAPG group had less blood loss ( P = .024), more harvested lymph nodes ( P = .021), and higher costs than those in the LAPG group ( P < .001). With regard to surgical stress, no significant differences were observed in C-reactive protein concentrations and white blood cell count on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7 between the groups ( Ps > .05). There appeared to be higher hemoglobin levels at 6 months ( P = .053) and a higher body mass index at 12 months ( P = .056) postoperatively in patients in the RAPG group compared with those in the LAPG group, but this difference was not significant. Similar disease-free survival and overall survival rates were observed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS:RAPG could be an alternative to LAPG for patients with early gastric cancer in the upper stomach with comparable oncological safety and nutritional status. Further well-designed, prospective, large-scale studies are needed to validate these results.

Project description:Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) is widely used for gastric cancer (GC) patients nowadays. This study aimed to investigate the time trend of outcomes so as to describe the learning curve for GC patients with LADG at a single medical institution in western China over a 6-year period.A total of 246 consecutive GC patients with LADG were divided into 5 groups (group A: 46 patients from 2006 to 2007; group B: 47 patients in 2008; group C: 49 patients in 2009; group D: 73 patients in 2010; and group E: 31 patients in 2011). All surgeries were conducted by the same surgeon. Comparative analyses were successively performed by Mann-Whitney U test or Student t test among the 5 different groups for the clinical data, including clinicopathologic characteristics, surgical parameters, postoperative course, and survival outcomes, through which the learning curve was described.There were no differences in the baseline information among the 5 groups (P?>?0.05), and the proportion of advanced GC patients with LADG slightly increased from 58.7% to 77.4% during the 6 years. Besides, the proportion of D2/D2+ lymphadenectomy and the number of retrieved lymph nodes gradually grew from 60.9% to 80.6% and from 20.0 to 28.8, respectively. In addition, the operation time decreased from 299.2 to 267.8 minutes, while the estimated blood loss dropped from 175.2 to 146.8?mL. Furthermore, some surgical parameters (surgical duration and blood loss) and postoperative course (such as postoperative complications, the time to ambulation, to first flatus, and to first liquid intake as well as the length of hospital stay) were all observed to be significantly different between group A and other groups (P?<?0.05), illustrating a similar downward trend and remaining stable to form a plateau after 46 cases in group A. However, no difference on overall survival was found among these 5 groups, and multivariate analysis indicated that factors, such as age, tumor differentiation, tumor size, and T stage as well as N stage, were independent prognostic factors for patients with LADG.Improvement on surgical parameters and postoperative course can be seen over the past years, and the cutoff value of the learning curve of LADG for surgeons with rich experience in open operation might be 46 cases.

Project description:BackgroundThe aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the long-term survival, mortality, morbidity and the operation-related events in patients with periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma undergoing pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) and pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy (PRPD).MethodA systematic search of literature databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science) was performed to identify studies. Outcome measures comparing PPPD versus PRPD for periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma were long-term survival, mortality, morbidity (overall morbidity, delayed gastric emptying [DGE], pancreatic fistula, wound infection, postoperative bleeding, biliary leakage, ascites and gastroenterostomy leakage) and operation related events (hospital stays, operating time, intraoperative blood loss and red blood cell transfusions).ResultsEight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 622 patients were identified and included in the analysis. Among these patients, it revealed no difference in long-term survival between the PPPD and PRPD groups (HR?=?0.23, p?=?0.11). There was a lower rate of DGE (RR?=?2.35, p?=?0.04, 95% CI, 1.06-5.21) with PRPD. Mortality, overall morbidity, pancreatic fistula, wound infection, postoperative bleeding, biliary leakage, ascites and gastroenterostomy leakage were not significantly different between the groups. PPPDs were performed more quickly than PRPDs (WMD?=?53.25 minutes, p?=?0.01, 95% CI, 12.53-93.97); and there was less estimated intraoperative blood loss (WMD?=?365.21 ml, p?=?0.006, 95% CI, 102.71-627.71) and fewer red blood cell transfusions (WMD?=?0.29 U, p?=?0.003, 95% CI, 0.10-0.48) in patients undergoing PPPD. The hospital stays showed no significant difference.ConclusionsPPPD had advantages over PRPD in operating time, intraoperative blood loss and red blood cell transfusions, but had a significantly higher rate of DGE for periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. PPPD and PRPD had comparable mortality and morbidity including pancreatic fistulas, wound infections, postoperative bleeding, biliary leakage, ascites and gastroenterostomy leakage. Our conclusions were limited by the available data. Further evaluations of high-quality RCTs are needed.

Dataset Information

Objective evaluation of clinical outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for middle-third early gastric cancer.

Publications

Objective evaluation of clinical outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for middle-third early gastric cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets